Livista @ Bandar Sri Damansara — the 700-unit project with no statutory filing in the public record
Two towers, 700 units (Block A 344 + Block B 356) on a 3.02-acre parcel — the former Sri Damansara Clubhouse site, phase 1 of a 19.11-acre masterplan. Licensed developer SRI DAMANSARA SDN BHD (110516-H), the original 1980s township company, a subsidiary of Bursa Main Market-listed Land & General Berhad (5507-H). Also marketed as Damansara Livista. Every figure below is attributed to a named published source, and where two sources disagree this page prints both.
I reply with the filed particulars where they exist — and I tell you plainly where they do not.
Livista @ Bandar Sri Damansara at a glance
Fourteen facts, each with the source that published it. Where nobody published a figure, the row says so instead of filling the gap — and on this project that happens more often than on any other page on this site.
- Project name
- Livista @ Bandar Sri DamansaraTwo live marketing names, and the developer’s own group uses both. The microsite and the group project list say “Livista Bandar Sri Damansara”; the listed parent’s own Bursa media releases say “Damansara Livista”, and every portal follows the parent. Same project.
- Registered scheme name
- NOT PUBLISHEDThere is no “Residensi Livista” and no registered Malay scheme name for this project in any Malaysian record. Do not accept one that is invented for you. The name a buyer signs against cannot be established from any public source.
- Licensed developer
- SRI DAMANSARA SDN BHD110516-H — printed verbatim on the developer’s own microsite footer and in both e-books, three readings identical. A subsidiary of Land & General Berhad (5507-H), Bursa Malaysia Main Market. The 12-digit registration number is not printed anywhere. EdgeProp and PropertyGuru both name the listed parent as the developer; they are wrong.
- Building type
- UNRESOLVEDThe Edge’s editorial says condominium twice; its own paid advertorial, StarProperty, EdgeProp, PropertyGuru and the myBina register all say serviced apartment. The developer names no building type at all. See the FAQ for what hangs on it.
- Land title class
- NOT PUBLISHEDTwo aggregators record it as commercial — myrumahbaru prints “Commercial under HDA”, IQI prints “Category: Commercial”. No document. The developer states no title class anywhere.
- Tenure
- FreeholdUnanimous across the group site, The Edge, EdgeProp, PropertyGuru, IQI and myrumahbaru, and consistent with StarProperty’s 2016 description of this land as “prime freehold commercial land”. Not from a filing — no filing exists. No lease expiry applies.
- Total units
- 700 — Block A 344, Block B 356The Edge, three times. 344 + 356 = 700, which equals every source’s total: no unexplained residue in which a non-HDA parcel could sit.
- Storeys
- NOT PUBLISHED by the developer — three figures circulate25 and 26 (The Edge, Oct/Nov 2023) · 29 (myBina register, verified 16 Feb 2024) · 35 and 36 (The Edge advertorial, 15 Jun 2026). This page publishes none of them. See the arithmetic in the FAQ.
- Layouts
- Types A, B1 and B2 onlyA 690 sq ft, 2 bed, 1 bath · B1 1,012 sq ft, 3 bed, 2 bath · B2 1,035 sq ft, 3 bed, 2 bath. The developer’s own tabulated unit schedule, identical in the 2023 and April 2024 e-books. 64.1 / 94.0 / 96.2 m² are my conversions. No office suite, SOHO or studio appears in any schedule.
- Land area
- 3.02 acresThe Edge three times; IQI prints 131,551 sq ft, and 131,551 ÷ 43,560 = 3.0200 acres, so the two independent figures agree exactly. Not from a filing.
- Site density
- about 231.8 units per acreMy own arithmetic: 700 ÷ 3.02 acres. The developer’s “Low Density” claim is a floor-plate claim and its own bracket says so: “(8 – 12 Units per Floor)”. Do not add the 5.21-acre Senses Park to the denominator — it is public open space on the MRT-station parcel.
- Price
- SPA price (合同价) RM530,000 – RM770,000The only figure anywhere that its own source labels as an SPA price — the independent aggregator myrumahbaru. There is no filed statutory Unit Selling Price band for this project to publish. About RM210,000 of spread exists on the floor figure alone across five sources, and only this one carries a price-class label. This is marketing information. It is not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer.
- Maintenance charge
- an indicative 35 sen psf per monthIncluding the sinking fund — The Edge Malaysia, Oct/Nov 2023, at launch. Indicative and three years old. The developer publishes no maintenance charge at all, and no source publishes the sinking fund as a separate rate.
- Expected completion
- No filed date existsend-2026 (The Edge at launch) · 30 Dec 2026 (IQI, listed 9 Jun 2023, never updated) · 3Q2027 (The Edge, Nov 2025) · 2027 Q4 (myrumahbaru) · a bare 2027 (EdgeProp, PropertyGuru, the Jun 2026 advertorial). About a year of slip. The developer dates nothing itself. Liquidated damages run from the date in your own SPA.
Jump to what you came for
This page is organised the way a buyer actually asks questions — starting with the fact that the document trail a buyer is entitled to expect is simply not there.
Ten things about Livista that do not add up — and the source for each
None of this is rumour. Every item below comes from the developer’s own microsite or e-books, a construction register, a named published article, or arithmetic I have shown you. Where the developer’s own two documents disagree with each other, or with a paid advertorial published in its own name, both are shown.
For a 700-unit project, there is no statutory filing at all
No APDL number, no permit validity, no developer licence number, no licence validity, no approving authority, no building plan approval reference, no filed building type, no filed tenure class, no filed storey count, no filed completion date and no filed statutory price band is in the public record for this project. The developer’s project microsite has exactly one page — its own WordPress index returns a single entry — so there is no disclaimer, terms or APDL page on it, and L&G publishes no APDL page on any project microsite. A HIMS brochure search returns only unrelated filings; two KPKT TEDUH records exist for this licensee but return no readable text; both e-books, 2023 and April 2024, print no statutory block. This is a project reported about 90% sold by a Bursa Main Market developer’s subsidiary. This is the honest centre of gravity of this page.
Lapse cannot be assessed, so it will not be implied
Because no permit number and no licence number are published at all, there is no validity period to test against today’s date. A page that tells you a permit is “current” here would be inventing it, and one that tells you it has lapsed would be too. Never let a developer licence validity be presented to you as the APDL validity — they are different instruments with different expiry dates. Neither is available here, so neither is implied. Ask the sales gallery to show you both, and photograph them.
Three storey counts, and the developer publishes none
25 and 26 storeys (The Edge, Oct/Nov 2023) · 29 (myBina construction register, verified 16 Feb 2024) · 35 and 36 (The Edge branded advertorial, 15 Jun 2026) · not stated on the developer’s own microsite or in either e-book. Now the arithmetic against the developer’s own printed “8 – 12 Units per Floor” claim: 344 ÷ 35 = 9.8 and 356 ÷ 36 = 9.9, both in range; 344 ÷ 29 = 11.9, just in range; but 344 ÷ 25 = 13.8 and 356 ÷ 26 = 13.7, both above the developer’s own stated maximum. So the 2023 figure breaks the developer’s own density claim. Indicative only — podium and facility levels count in a storey total while carrying no units — which is exactly why this page publishes no storey count.
Condominium or serviced apartment, residential or commercial title — unresolved
The Edge’s editorial desk says “700 condominium units” in 2023 and again in 2025. The Edge’s own paid advertorial says “freehold serviced apartments”. StarProperty, EdgeProp, PropertyGuru and the myBina register all say serviced apartment or serviced residence. The same publisher contradicts itself across its editorial and its paid content. myrumahbaru and IQI both record the title class as commercial. The developer names no building type and no title class anywhere. What hangs on it: commercial quit rent and assessment, non-domestic electricity and water tariffs, commercial-rate utility deposits, and a different resale market. The two fields that would settle it are jenis bangunan and pegangan tanah in the filed particulars — and there is no filing.
Five price figures, about RM210,000 of spread, one price-class label
This project does have an SPA-labelled band, and it is the only figure on this page: SPA price (合同价) RM530,000 – RM770,000, from the independent aggregator myrumahbaru. It is not a filed statutory band — none exists. Four other figures circulate across four other sources, and this page carries none of them: one sits below the SPA floor and therefore cannot be shown to be a contract price at all; one is a March 2023 forum post whose own author asked whether the name and price were even confirmed; one is a foreign-currency figure on an IQI site with no price-class label; one is an editorial average psf from the launch period. About RM210,000 of spread on the floor figure alone, across five sources, of which exactly one is labelled an SPA price. This is marketing information. It is not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer.
“Low density” is a floor-plate claim, and the park is not the project’s land
The developer prints “Low Density (8 – 12 Units per Floor)” — its own bracket is the honest part, because that is a floor-plate statement. True site density is 700 ÷ 3.02 acres = about 231.8 units per acre (my arithmetic). The trap: adding the 5.21-acre Senses Park gives a flattering 85 per acre, and the park is public open space on the MRT-station parcel, not Livista’s land and not common property its management corporation controls. Three sizes are published for it — 5, 5.2 and 5.21 acres — and the timeline runs backwards: The Edge said in November 2025 that it “will be completed soon”, while the June 2026 advertorial still calls it “to be built”. Dividing by the 19.11-acre masterplan (36.6/acre) or the 22-acre figure (31.8) would be wronger still.
The MRT link bridge runs from The FLO, not from Livista’s lobby
The covered walkway to the station is central to the project’s whole pitch — it has its own developer image and caption. It is also a commitment, not a completed facility. The Edge reported in November 2025 that L&G “is building a pedestrian link bridge from The FLO to the Sri Damansara Barat MRT station”, and the June 2026 advertorial still frames it as a commitment. The FLO is the sales-gallery and office parcel: no source states that the bridge starts at Livista’s own lobby. Who pays for it, whose land it lands on, and when either the walkway or the bridge completes are all unpublished. That is also why the station distance is measured three ways — 500 m, 526 m and a 720 m walk.
Louis’s own agency network is publishing the wrong numbers — and this page says so
IQI’s own project page for Livista, listed 9 June 2023 and never updated, publishes the built-up range as “694 to 1,039 sq ft” — the pre-launch schedule. The launched schedule is 690 / 1,012 / 1,035, smaller by 4, 24 and 4 sq ft. IQI also lists 21 facilities, seven of which appear nowhere on the developer’s own material, including a surau, and it still carries 30 December 2026 as the completion date while The Edge moved to 3Q2027 in November 2025. Separately, PropertyGuru publishes the layout range as “1,012 to 1,035 sq ft”, which silently drops the 690 sq ft 2-bedroom type — the project’s entry product. EdgeProp prints Type A as 689. Use 690 / 1,012 / 1,035 and nothing else.
“Ready-furnished” is an advertorial claim the developer’s own spec sheet does not make
The branded advertorial of 15 June 2026 describes the units as “ready-furnished with air-conditioning, kitchen cabinets, hob and hood”. Both of the developer’s own e-books list air-conditioner POINTS — 3 in Type A, 4 in B1 and B2, which is provision for rather than supply of air-conditioners — and list no kitchen cabinets, no hob and no hood anywhere in the finishes schedule. A fitted-item claim from paid placement that the developer’s own specification does not support is not repeated here. Get the fitting-out schedule as an annexure to the SPA.
No award belongs to Livista, and there is no green claim to check
The developer’s own awards page lists eight entries and not one is Livista’s. The 2018 iProperty best residential high-rise award belongs to Damansara Seresta. The 2016 IPA landscape award belongs to Astoria Ampang, the 2013 IPA landscape awards to Damansara Foresta. The FIABCI Malaysia Property Award 1996 belongs to the township. The rest are company awards, including a 2019 Focus Malaysia award for sustainability reporting — a corporate-reporting award, not a building certification. On green rating, no claim of any kind is made for Livista: no GBI, GreenRE, LEED, Green Mark or energy rating, and no green logo. The GBI gallery returned 404 and 500; the GreenRE table returned truncated with no matching row. Both checks are inconclusive, which is not a negative — and nothing was asserted, so nothing is overstated.
What is actually being built, and the dated record behind it
The statistics band carries only figures a named source published, plus two I computed and have labelled as mine. The facilities schedule separates what the developer itself publishes from what a paid advertorial adds and what an agent network adds on its own authority — because on this project those three lists do not agree, and one of them is Louis’s own network.
Facilities — three lists that do not reconcile, and no level assigned to anything
No source, including the developer, assigns a single facility to a level. The developer publishes a graphic only — one facilities key plan under its own heading “ELEGANT COMFORT IN EVERY CORNER” — and no text schedule of levels on the microsite or in either e-book. So this page cannot honestly say “Level 8 pool deck”, and it does not. The counts do not agree either: PropertyGuru says 12, The Edge’s advertorial describes 15, IQI lists 21. No source publishes a reconciled count.
Published by the developer itself
- 50-metre lap pool
- Three-storey water cascade — the microsite’s own headline: “Greetings from 3 storey heights water cascade, everyday”
- “Camping by the sky” — a camping or glamping deck
- Canopy waterfall · camp area · castle playground — image captions and adjacent headings only
- Covered pedestrian walkway to the MRT station — a commitment, not a completed facility
- Park & Ride at the station — an MRT-operator facility, not the developer’s
- “Senses ark” — printed exactly so in the developer’s own e-book, a mis-set of “Senses Park”. The park is public open space on the MRT-station parcel, not Livista’s land, published at 5, 5.2 and 5.21 acres by different sources and still described as “to be built” in June 2026.
Added by The Edge’s branded advertorial, 15 Jun 2026
- Reading room · working space · indoor kids’ playroom
- Aqua gym · indoor gym · basketball court · sauna
- Sun deck · island Jacuzzi · lazy pool lounge
- Viewing and glamping pavilion · dining pavilion · campfire and BBQ terrace
- Also in the same advertorial: “ready-furnished with air-conditioning, kitchen cabinets, hob and hood” — which the developer’s own specification schedule does not say. The e-books list air-conditioner POINTS and no cabinets, hob or hood at all.
Appearing ONLY on IQI’s page — agent-published, not developer-published
- Surau — buyers ask about this one specifically, and the developer confirms no surau anywhere. This page does not put one on the project on an agent page’s word.
- Reflexology path · recreation room · multifunction space · castle playground · “Over the Rainbow Bridge” · “Raining Garden & Kid’s Pool”
- IQI lists 21 facilities in total. IQI is Louis’s own agency network, and on this project its page is one of the wrong ones — it also carries the pre-launch built-ups 694 / 1,036 / 1,039 and a completion date of 30 December 2026. Said here because it is true, not because it is comfortable.
What the developer does publish about the building itself
- “I” fin floor layout — “designed for natural cross-ventilation and daylight”
- “Low Density (8 – 12 Units per Floor)” — a floor-plate claim, not a site density
- 4 + 1 lifts per tower
- Ventilated corridors and a private lift lobby
- Towers named Tower A and Tower B in the 2023 e-book floor-plan headers; The Edge calls them Block A and Block B
Not published for facilities, therefore not on this page
- Which facility sits on which level — only a graphic exists, no text schedule from anyone
- Whether any facility is provided as “space only” or shell with no fit-out commitment — no source marks one, and no source publishes a fit-out commitment either, so the absence is not a reassurance
- A reconciled facilities count — 12, 15 and 21 are all in circulation
- Total car park bay count for the development, visitor bays, motorcycle bays and EV charging. Only the per-type allocation is published, and only by one source: Type A one bay, Types B1 and B2 two bays each (The Edge advertorial, 15 Jun 2026). The developer has never printed even that.
- Total facility deck area, ceiling heights, balcony sizes per type, and the net-versus-gross basis of the built-ups
- Who will own and maintain Senses Park, and whether Livista’s owners contribute to it
- Whether the covered walkway and the link bridge land on Livista’s parcel at all, who pays for them, and the completion date for either
- The management or JMB arrangement, and whether the two towers share one management corporation with each other or with another phase of the masterplan
Dated record — named reporting, a construction register, and the developer’s own documents
Three types, 700 units — and the schedule nobody filed
There is no filed built-up schedule for this project, so every figure below is a marketed figure. The baseline is the developer’s own tabulated unit schedule, identical in the 2023 and the April 2024 e-books and corroborated by the two floor-plan captions on its microsite. Nothing below is taken from narrative prose, and where a portal disagrees, the disagreement is printed.
Type A — 690 sq ft
The project’s entry product, and the one the market most often loses. 690 sq ft, 2 bedrooms, 1 bathroom in the developer’s own schedule, corroborated by The Edge twice and EdgeProp’s editorial. The developer’s own fixture schedule lists 1 shower point, 1 WC, 1 wash basin, 1 kitchen sink, 13 lighting points, 4 ceiling-fan points, 12 13A socket outlets, 1 15A outlet, 3 air-conditioner points and 1 water heater point — which independently corroborates the 2-bed, 1-bath description from the developer’s own engineering list rather than its marketing copy. Three portals get this type wrong: EdgeProp prints it as 689 sq ft; PropertyGuru drops it from its layout block entirely and publishes the range as “1,012 to 1,035 sq ft”, so a buyer reading PropertyGuru would think the smallest unit is 1,012 sq ft; and IQI still publishes the pre-launch 694. myrumahbaru renames the B1 code to “Type B”. One car park bay comes from one source only, the June 2026 advertorial; the developer has never printed a car park allocation at all.
Ask for the Type A floor plan
Type B1 — 1,012 sq ft
The one layout whose floor plan the developer actually publishes, captioned in its own words “Type B1 – 1012 sf”. Built-up corroborated by both e-books, both The Edge reports, the June 2026 advertorial and EdgeProp’s editorial. Fixture schedule for this type: 2 shower points, 2 WCs, 2 wash basins, 1 kitchen sink, 17 lighting points, 5 ceiling-fan points, 12 13A socket outlets, 1 15A outlet, 4 air-conditioner points and 2 water heater points. One kitchen sink, in a three-bedroom unit — which is why no source claims a dual-key layout here and the room lists would not support one. IQI still publishes the pre-launch 1,036 sq ft for this type. Air-conditioner points are provision, not supply: the developer’s schedule lists points, and lists no kitchen cabinets, hob or hood.
Ask for the B1 packType B2 — 1,035 sq ft
The largest type in the building, and only 23 sq ft larger than B1. Built-up corroborated by both e-books, both The Edge reports, the advertorial and EdgeProp’s editorial, and captioned on the developer’s own microsite as “Type B2 – 1035 sf”. Fixture schedule: 2 shower points, 2 WCs, 2 wash basins, 1 kitchen sink, 18 lighting points, 5 ceiling-fan points, 14 13A socket outlets, 1 15A outlet, 4 air-conditioner points and 2 water heater points — one more lighting point and two more sockets than B1, which is the only published difference between them beyond the 23 sq ft. IQI still publishes the pre-launch 1,039. There is no larger unit, no penthouse and no dual-key in any published schedule, and no source claims one.
Ask for the B2 floor planNo office suite, no SOHO, no studio — and why that is phrased carefully
Every published type in every source is a dwelling. A is a 2-bedroom, B1 and B2 are 3-bedrooms, and there is no studio at all in the developer’s e-books, on the microsite, in the advertorial, on EdgeProp, on PropertyGuru or on IQI. No retail or commercial parcel inside the two towers appears in any source. And the arithmetic leaves no room for one to hide: 344 + 356 = 700, which equals every source’s stated total, so there is no unexplained residue. That is a real positive and it is worth saying. What this page will not say is “confirmed none”, because the document that would prove it — the filed unit schedule — was never found. For completeness: a non-HDA component is reported for other phases of the same masterplan, including a 21-storey office block with retail, a hotel, two-storey shop lots and affordable high-rises, and the developer’s own sales gallery building, The FLO, sits on the masterplan’s office-zoned last phase. None of that is inside Livista’s two towers.
Ask for the filed unit scheduleWhat a filed built-up schedule would tell you — and does not, here
How many of the 700 units are Type A, B1 and B2 respectively. Which tower holds which types. Net versus gross built-up basis. Balcony size per type. Ceiling and floor-to-floor heights. Unit orientation and facing. The total car park bay count for the development, and whether any bay is an accessory parcel or common property. Visitor bays, motorcycle bays and EV charging. Lift-to-unit ratio behind the “4 + 1” per tower. Plot ratio and setbacks. The fitting-out level as a schedule rather than an advertorial sentence. None of these is published by the developer, by any register, in any filing, or on any portal. One more oddity worth knowing while you read the e-book: its 2023 floor-plan key runs 1 to 12 including a “3A” — the superstitious skip from 4 to 3A — and the developer’s own document does not say whether that is a unit number on a floor or the floor number itself. This page does not guess which.
Send these questions in writingProvenance note, flagged as mine rather than as filed fact: the 64.1, 94.0 and 96.2 m² figures are my own conversions — the developer publishes none. The 690 / 1,012 / 1,035 set comes from the developer’s own tabulated unit schedule in both e-book editions and is corroborated by the two floor-plan captions printed on its microsite; it was not read off narrative prose. Four different built-up sets are in circulation for this project: the current one; the March 2023 pre-launch set of 694 / 1,036 / 1,039, which IQI still publishes; EdgeProp’s 689 for Type A; and The Edge’s April 2021 report of 650–950 sq ft across 732 units, which describes an earlier, different scheme and is not Livista as built. This is marketing information. It is not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer.
Seven images, each graded for whether its subject is confirmed or inferred
Grading, and why it is on the page. Three of the seven subjects are confirmed by the developer’s own content-system title or by a printed caption on its own page; two more carry printed captions; and two are inferred from a file name alone and are labelled as inferred. Nothing here is captioned with a subject this page cannot source. What does not exist for this project, anywhere: a Type A floor plan, any interior or show-unit render, any dated site progress photograph, and any facilities level plan as a text schedule. The developer’s whole media library for a 700-unit project is 16 items, which is a thin asset set, and its own files carry two misspellings of its own project — “Senses ark” in the e-book, and a social-sharing image named “ogimg-livisa”. The developer’s own e-book disclaimer states that its information is subject to change, is not an offer or contract, that renderings are artist’s impressions and that measurements are approximate.
Ask me for the current site photographsPersiaran Perdana, Bandar Sri Damansara — and why the postcode is not the jurisdiction
The distances below are the developer’s own published table, identical in both e-book editions, which is itself a useful consistency check. Where a third party measures the same thing differently, both figures are shown. No distance on this page is my estimate. And on the state question: the weight of published evidence puts this project in Selangor, Daerah Petaling, under MBPJ — but no filed document settles it, because no filing for this project is publicly reachable.
Why the address says one thing and the register another. The developer’s own microsite, both of its e-books and its group site all print “52200 Kuala Lumpur” — for the Livista contact block, for the sales gallery, and for L&G’s own head office at 8trium. That is the developer printing its correct postal address. 52200 is a Kuala Lumpur postcode used by a township in Petaling Jaya: Bandar Sri Damansara is the only township in Petaling Jaya that uses one. A Pos Malaysia postcode is not a jurisdiction. No source names DBKL for this parcel, and this page does not. The mukim, the daerah and the PT or lot number of Livista’s own parcel are not published by anyone, and the mukim recorded for this licensee’s separate affordable scheme on an adjacent plot is not evidence about Livista’s parcel and is not carried across.
Public transport — the developer’s own table
- Sri Damansara West MRT Station — 500 m. The station’s operating name is Sri Damansara Barat, line code PY06 on the MRT Putrajaya Line. Two other measurements exist: 526 m (myrumahbaru) and 720 m / 9 minutes walking (PropertyGuru) — 220 m between the extremes, which is what you get when 500 m is a straight line and the covered walkway is not yet built.
- Sri Damansara Sentral MRT Station — 3 km
- Sri Damansara East MRT Station — 4 km. Do not read PropertyGuru’s grouping of all three Sri Damansara stations as “nearby” with a distance printed for only one of them. EdgeProp labels them with stale SSP planning codes (SSP168, SSP169) rather than the operating PY codes.
- Kepong Sentral KTM Commuter Station — 4 km (developer) vs 2.1 km (myrumahbaru): nearly double. Both are printed because both were published.
- Damansara Damai MRT Station — 7 km
- 8TRIUM Damansara bus stop — 248 m (myrumahbaru). The developer’s own table publishes no bus stop at all.
Education — and the related-party disclosure that goes with it
- Sri Bestari International School — 600 m (myrumahbaru measures 593 m) and Sri Bestari Private School — 600 m. Disclose this: both Sri Bestari schools are owned by the developer’s own group — L&G’s wholly owned Lang Education Sdn Bhd operates the private school, the international school and Manjaria Bestari Kindergarten, per L&G’s own media release of 29 May 2026. It is a real amenity and a related party, and both are worth knowing.
- SK Bandar Sri Damansara 2 — 850 m (developer) vs 663 m (myrumahbaru)
- SK Bandar Sri Damansara 1 — 1 km · SMK Bandar Sri Damansara 2 — 1.2 km · SK Bandar Sri Damansara 3 — 1.8 km · SMK Bandar Sri Damansara 1 — 2 km · SJK (C) Desa Jaya 2 — 2 km
- IGB International School — 4.6 km · The International School @ Park City — 5.4 km · ELC International School — 5.6 km · First City University College — 11.3 km
Shopping, and the F&B that is the developer’s own
- The FLO Alfresco Street — 50 m and Star Grocer Supermarket — 50 m. The FLO is the developer’s own sales-gallery and office building, on the masterplan’s office-zoned last phase — not a Livista facility.
- 8trium — 300 m (developer) vs 394 m (myrumahbaru). 8trium is where both the licensee and L&G file their own offices — at Level 18 on the Livista material and Level 21 on the group site, two floors of the same tower, which is the kind of drift that shows nobody reconciled the two documents.
- Decathlon / Courts Mammoth — 300 m · Uniqlo Sri Damansara — 1 km · Lotus Menjalara — 5.2 km · Plaza Arkadia — 5.6 km
- Aeon Mall Metro Prima — 6 km · The Curve — 7.1 km · IKEA — 7.2 km · 1 Utama Shopping Centre — 8.4 km
Hospitals and medical centres
- Parkcity Medical Centre — 5.9 km · Damansara Specialist Hospital 2 — 6 km · Damansara Damai Medical Centre — 6 km
- Sungai Buloh Hospital — 7.2 km · Selayang Hospital — 8.8 km · KPJ Damansara Specialist Hospital — 10.1 km · Tropicana Medical Centre — 13.1 km
- The developer’s table publishes no clinic at all. myrumahbaru adds RJ Clinic Ativo Plaza at 448 m and Klinik Aman Putra at 801 m; PropertyGuru names two clinics with no distances.
Named as a benefit with NO distance published by anyone
- LDP, NKVE, DUKE and DUKE 2, Penchala Link / SPRINT, MRR2, DASH and the North–South Expressway — all named as “highway access” by The Edge’s advertorial and by EdgeProp, none with a distance to an interchange. This page does not estimate one.
- Senses Park — adjacency only, no distance, and it is public open space on the MRT-station parcel, not a project facility
- Sri Damansara Business Park · Bukit Lanjan Forest Reserve · Ativo Plaza · The FLO sales gallery as distinct from The FLO Alfresco Street
- Nothing at all is published for: the nearest police station, fire station, mosque or surau outside the project, wet market, post office or petrol station; KLIA or Subang airport; and KLCC or the city centre. Not one of them is estimated here.
Location particulars that are NOT published
- Pihak berkuasa yang meluluskan pelan bangunan — NOT PRINTED. Best secondary reading: MBPJ, from The Edge’s statement about the township, which is reporting and not a filed field.
- No. kelulusan pelan bangunan — NOT PRINTED
- PT or lot number of the development parcel — NOT PUBLISHED by any source
- Mukim and daerah for Livista’s own parcel — NOT PUBLISHED. Two sources place the township in Petaling.
- GPS coordinates — not published by any government register. The Selangor housing board register covers affordable schemes only, so a market-priced scheme like Livista could not appear there and its absence proves nothing — which also means the coordinate cross-check that settles state disputes on affordable Selangor schemes is unavailable here.
- Flood history as a survey. A third-party model rates river and heavy-rain risk as “low” and puts the building about 4 m above Sungai Gasi; that is model output, not a survey, and it is recorded as such.
The density trap on this township, said once more because it is the most common error made about it. Livista’s own parcel is 3.02 acres, and 700 units on it is about 231.8 units per acre. Adding the 5.21-acre Senses Park gives 85 per acre and is wrong, because the park is public open space on the MRT-station parcel and was still unbuilt in June 2026. Using the 19.11-acre masterplan gives 36.6 per acre and is wronger; using StarProperty’s 22-acre figure gives 31.8 and is wronger still. The masterplan figures themselves disagree — 19.11 acres (The Edge, repeated in the developer’s own 2026 advertorial) vs 22 acres (StarProperty), published four days apart in September–October 2023 — and a third figure, 36 acres, describes the wider freehold commercial landbank rather than the masterplan. Density has to be computed against Livista’s own 3.02 acres and nothing else.
The statutory register — and the filing that does not exist
Malaysian law requires a licensed housing developer to file and display statutory advertisement particulars, and that filing is public. For Livista @ Bandar Sri Damansara, no such filing could be located in any form, anywhere. Not one statutory field for a roughly 700-unit project reported about 90% sold by a Bursa Main Market developer’s subsidiary is in the public record. So rather than dress a brochure up as a filing, the three columns below set out, unedited: (A) the statutory fields as they would be printed and as they actually stand; (B) everything the developer itself publishes, which is one microsite page and two e-book editions; and (C) every third-party register, publication and portal, with each one’s disagreements shown. Read the columns together. Column A is almost entirely blank, and that blankness is the finding.
| (A) The statutory advertisement particulars — as they would be filed, and as they actually stand | (B) The developer’s own material — one microsite page and two e-books | (C) Third-party registers, press and portals — with their contradictions |
|---|---|---|
| Nama Skim / Projek NOT PRINTED — no filing, and no registered Malay scheme name exists in any Malaysian record. There is no “Residensi Livista”. Do not accept an invented one. Pemaju SRI DAMANSARA SDN BHD (110516-H) — NOT from a filing; from the developer’s own microsite footer and both e-books only No. Lesen Pemaju NOT PRINTED / NOT PUBLISHED BY ANY SOURCE Tempoh sah lesen NOT PRINTED No. Permit Iklan dan Jualan (APDL) NOT PRINTED / NOT PUBLISHED BY ANY SOURCE Tempoh sah APDL NOT PRINTED — so lapse-vs-current CANNOT be assessed, and is not implied anywhere on this page Nama Pegawai Pemaju NOT PRINTED Pihak berkuasa yang meluluskan pelan bangunan NOT PRINTED — best secondary reading MBPJ, from reporting about the township, not a filed field No. kelulusan pelan bangunan NOT PRINTED Jenis bangunan NOT PRINTED — sources split between condominium and serviced apartment Pegangan tanah Freehold — NOT from a filing, but unanimous across every source and consistent with the 2016 description of this land as “prime freehold commercial land”. No lease expiry applies. Kelas tanah / title class NOT PRINTED — two aggregators say commercial; no document Sekatan kepentingan NOT PRINTED · Bebanan / chargee NOT PRINTED — no chargee bank is named by any source Jadual Perjanjian (G / H / I / J) NOT PRINTED — do not assume Schedule H, and whether a housing development account exists is not stated by anyone Jumlah unit 700 — NOT from a filing. Block A 344, Block B 356 (The Edge ×3). 344 + 356 = 700, no residue. Bilangan tingkat NOT PRINTED — and three different figures circulate: 25/26, 29, and 35/36 Tempat letak kereta 1 bay for Type A; 2 bays for B1 and B2 — NOT from a filing, from the 15 Jun 2026 advertorial only. Total bay count NOT PUBLISHED by any source. Tarikh dijangka siap NOT PRINTED — and it has slipped about a year across sources Harga jualan unit minima – maksima (statutory) NOT PRINTED. THIS PROJECT HAS NO PUBLISHED STATUTORY PRICE BAND. Jadual keluasan binaan A 690 / B1 1,012 / B2 1,035 sq ft — NOT from a filing, from the developer’s own e-book schedule Keluasan tanah 3.02 acres / 131,551 sq ft — NOT from a filing; The Edge ×3 and IQI, cross-checked by my own conversion Diskaun Bumiputera NOT PRINTED anywhere — no such field exists in any source for this project, so there is nothing to withhold. Recorded as a factual absence. | Microsite livista.com.my — exactly ONE page. Its own WordPress index returns a single entry, so there is no /apdl, /terms, /disclaimer or /policy page on it to find. L&G publishes no APDL page on any project microsite, and its corporate site has none either. Developed by, verbatim “SRI DAMANSARA SDN BHD (110516-H) · A Subsidiary Of Land & General Berhad.” — microsite footer and both e-books, three readings identical Address as printed 8trium, Level 18, Menara 1, Jalan Cempaka SD 12/5, Bandar Sri Damansara, 52200 Kuala Lumpur. The group site prints Level 21 of the same tower for itself. Telephone as printed +603-6279 8000 · fax +603 6279 8022 · sales gallery 03-6419 9858 Unit schedule A 690 sq ft 2 bed 1 bath · B1 1,012 sq ft 3 bed 2 bath · B2 1,035 sq ft 3 bed 2 bath — identical in the 2023 and April 2024 editions Fixture schedule per type shower points, WCs, wash basins, one kitchen sink per unit in every type, lighting and ceiling-fan points, 13A and 15A outlets, air-conditioner POINTS (3 / 4 / 4), water heater points, doorbell, telephone, distribution box, TV or SMATV point Floor plate “I” fin floor layout · “Low Density (8 – 12 Units per Floor)” · 4 + 1 lifts per tower · ventilated corridors · private lift lobby Towers Tower A and Tower B in the 2023 e-book floor-plan headers Floor plans published B1 and B2 only — captioned “Type B1 – 1012 sf” and “Type B2 – 1035 sf”. No Type A floor plan exists anywhere. Facilities a key-plan GRAPHIC only, under the heading “ELEGANT COMFORT IN EVERY CORNER”. No text schedule of levels, on the microsite or in either e-book. Distances a full table, identical in both e-book editions — 500 m to “Sri Damansara West” station, 600 m to both Sri Bestari schools, 50 m to The FLO Alfresco Street, and so on Its own spelling “Senses ark” for Senses Park in its own e-book, and a social-sharing image named “ogimg-livisa” — the developer misspells its own project in its own files, twice Building type NOT NAMED AT ALL — no “condominium”, no “serviced apartment”, no “pangsapuri servis”, anywhere Storey count NOT STATED · Completion date NOT STATED · Price NOT STATED · Maintenance charge NOT STATED Car park allocation NOT PRINTED by the developer in either e-book Statutory block NEITHER E-BOOK PRINTS ONE — only the “Developed by” company block plus a generic disclaimer: information is subject to change, is not an offer or contract, renderings are artist’s impressions, measurements are approximate | myBina construction register, project 76662 — category Service Apartment, summary “29 storey serviced apartments 344 units”, State: Selangor, status “Construction – Piling & Foundation Works” with substructure works on site as at 16 Feb 2024. Contractor and contract sum behind a paid wall. The Edge, Oct/Nov 2023 — 700 condominium units, 25 and 26 storeys, 344 / 356, 3.02 acres, former clubhouse site, phase 1 of a 19.11-acre, RM1.1 billion, five-phase, ~15-year masterplan, GDV RM460m, completion end-2026, an editorial average price per square foot that this page does not publish, service charge an indicative 35 sen psf including sinking fund The Edge, Nov 2025 — 700 condominium units across two blocks, about 90% sold (developer-reported, never audited), completion 3Q2027, link bridge being built from The FLO, Senses Park “will be completed soon” The Edge branded advertorial, 15 Jun 2026 — paid placement, so developer-supplied copy. Freehold serviced apartments, Block A 35 / Block B 36 storeys, car parks 1 / 2 / 2, 15 facilities, Senses Park “to be built”, and the “ready-furnished with air-conditioning, kitchen cabinets, hob and hood” claim the developer’s own spec schedule does not make The Edge cover story, Apr 2021 — the township “comes under the jurisdiction of Majlis Bandaraya Petaling Jaya” and sits on the Selangor–KL border; reports the clubhouse redevelopment as 732 serviced apartments of 650–950 sq ft, an earlier and different scheme StarProperty, 20 Sep 2023 — “a serviced residence complex with 700 units”, GDV RM460m, 22-acre masterplan, “a 5-acre recreational park” StarProperty, 19 Sep 2016 — the township’s redevelopment landbank as “36 acres of prime freehold commercial land” EdgeProp listing 52535 — building type “Condominium/Apartment”, address Bandar Sri Damansara, Selangor, 52200, Type A printed as 689 sq ft, developer field says Land & General Berhad while its own description says Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd, stations labelled with stale SSP codes, no No. Lesen Pemaju transcribed PropertyGuru 18203 — property type “Service Residence”, Selangor, layout range published as “1,012 to 1,035 sq ft” which silently drops the 690 sq ft entry type, “See all 12 facilities”, three Sri Damansara stations listed as nearby with a distance for only one (720 m / 9 min), and the same licensee-versus-parent contradiction as EdgeProp myrumahbaru — type “Condominium”, title “Commercial under HDA”, B1 renamed “Type B”, completion 2027 Q4, MRT 526 m (PY06 Sri Damansara Barat), Kepong Sentral KTM 2.1 km, and the only SPA-labelled price band anywhere: SPA price (合同价) RM530,000 – RM770,000 IQI project page, listed 9 Jun 2023 — Louis’s own agency network, and one of the wrong ones here. Land area 131,551 sq ft (which agrees with 3.02 acres exactly), category Commercial, property type Highrise, but built-ups as the pre-launch 694 to 1,039 sq ft, completion still 30 Dec 2026, 21 facilities including a surau the developer never confirms, and Kuala Lumpur in the address block while its own URL and title say Selangor Bursa / contractor announcements naming this employer — NONE FOUND. The two Bandar Sri Damansara serviced-apartment contract announcements that exist — a Pesona Metro subsidiary’s RM264.3m job and a Taghill RM494m job — name Indo Aman Bina Sdn Bhd of TA Global as employer: a different developer and a different project, the Damansara Avenue siblings. Neither belongs to Livista and neither is used here. Selangor housing board register — covers affordable schemes only, so a market-priced scheme could not appear and its absence proves nothing. It does carry this same licensee for a separate price-controlled scheme on an adjacent plot; that scheme’s registered name, mukim and state registration are not evidence about Livista’s parcel and are not carried across. KPKT — HIMS brochure search returns only unrelated filings; two TEDUH developer records exist for this licensee but return no readable text and neither resolves as a licence serial; every candidate HIMS brochure path tested returned 404. |
What the blanks in column A actually cost you. Without the filed jenis bangunan and pegangan tanah you cannot tell whether you are buying a residential-title condominium or a commercial-title serviced apartment — which decides your quit rent and assessment basis, whether you pay domestic or non-domestic electricity and water tariffs, the size of your utility deposits, and which market you resell into. Without the filed bilangan tingkat you cannot settle a storey count that three sources give three different answers to. Without the APDL number and its validity period you cannot tell whether the advertising and sales permit is current, and this page refuses to imply either way. Without the filed harga jualan unit minima – maksima there is no statutory benchmark against which a marketing figure can be tested — which is why four of the five price figures in circulation for this project are not published here. And without jadual perjanjian you do not know whether your contract runs under Schedule G or Schedule H, which changes your payment schedule and your liquidated-damages clock.
The one price band on this page, SPA price (合同价) RM530,000 – RM770,000, is not a filed statutory band — no filed statutory Unit Selling Price minimum and maximum exists for this project in any reachable document. It is published because it is the only figure anywhere whose own source labels it as an SPA price, which is the only price class Louis publishes. This is marketing information. It is not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer. The figure that governs what you pay is the price list and the SPA at the sales gallery.
Can a foreigner buy here?
Ask before you commit, because on this project even the applicable threshold is unresolved. The weight of evidence puts the project in Selangor, where the thresholds are: Zone 1 and Zone 2 — RM2,000,000, and strata property and gated landed strata only; Zone 3, meaning Hulu Selangor and Sabak Bernam — RM1,000,000. Daerah Petaling is Zone 1, so the Selangor reading gives RM2,000,000. If it were in Kuala Lumpur / the Federal Territory, the threshold is RM1,000,000 with EPU consent. On the only SPA-labelled band, RM530,000 to RM770,000, every unit sits below both thresholds — so on price alone a foreign purchase would not qualify under either reading. The unresolved title class bites here too, because a commercial-title strata unit is treated differently again. No source states the foreign-ownership position for this specific project, so this page asserts none. Ask me and I will put it to Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd in writing.
Construction progress — what percentage is built?
No built-percentage figure is published by any source. What is on the record is myBina’s entry for this licensee’s Bandar Sri Damansara serviced-apartment project, recorded at “Construction – Piling & Foundation Works” with substructure works on site as at 16 February 2024 — which is consistent with a late-2027 rather than a 2026 completion. The main contractor, the contract sum and the progress percentage are not public: myBina holds the parties behind a paid wall and no Bursa announcement names this employer. Do not let anyone attribute the two public Bandar Sri Damansara serviced-apartment construction contracts to this project — the Pesona Metro subsidiary’s RM264.3 million job and the Taghill RM494 million job both name Indo Aman Bina Sdn Bhd of TA Global as employer, for the Damansara Avenue siblings. Different developer, different project. The developer reports about 90% take-up; that is developer-supplied and never audited, and it is reported here as exactly that. No dated site progress photograph is published by anyone. Ask me and I will go and look.
What this page does not publish, and why
Louis’s standing policy, applied to every project page on this site: no discount, no rebate, no nett price, no promotion, no freebie, no incentive, no commission, no Bumiputera figure, no leaseback or guaranteed-rental rate and no yield or ROI projection is published here, ever. Those are matters for a conversation, where they can be stated accurately and for your specific case rather than scraped off a page months later. Applied to this project specifically: the one SPA-labelled band above is published as a gross contract-price range exactly as its source labels its price class, and no adjustment to it of any kind appears on this page. The other four figures in circulation are not published either — one sits below the SPA floor, which means it cannot be shown to be a contract price at all rather than a figure net of something, and its value is therefore not printed here; one is a March 2023 forum post whose own author asked whether the name and price were even confirmed; one is a foreign-currency figure on an IQI site with no price-class label; and one is an editorial average psf from launch. About RM210,000 of spread exists on the floor figure alone across five sources, and only one of the five carries an SPA label. Beyond price, this page leaves blank everything no named source published: the APDL number and validity, the developer licence number and validity, the approving local authority and the building plan approval reference, the registered Malay scheme name, the PT or lot number, the mukim and daerah, the land title class, whether Schedule G or Schedule H applies and whether a housing development account exists, the storey count per tower, the total car park bay count and whether any bay is an accessory parcel, the chargee bank and any restriction in interest, the facilities level plan as a text schedule, whether any facility is space-only, the Type A floor plan, the maintenance charge as a contractual figure, the sinking fund as a separate rate, the expected total monthly outgoing per type, the management or JMB arrangement, who owns and maintains Senses Park and whether Livista’s owners contribute to it, whether the walkway and link bridge touch Livista’s parcel at all, the contractor and contract sum, any green certification status including “targeting”, any award, ceiling heights, balcony sizes, the net-versus-gross built-up basis, the unit mix count by type, which tower holds which types, and any Bumiputera allocation or quota. Every one of those is a question I will put to Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd in writing for you.
SRI DAMANSARA SDN BHD (110516-H) — the original township company, not the listed parent
The licensed developer of Livista @ Bandar Sri Damansara is SRI DAMANSARA SDN BHD, company registration number 110516-H. That name and number are printed verbatim on the developer’s own project microsite footer and in both of its e-book editions: “Developed by: SRI DAMANSARA SDN BHD (110516-H) · A Subsidiary Of Land & General Berhad.” Three readings, identical. The company’s business address as printed on the Livista material is 8trium, Level 18, Menara 1, Jalan Cempaka SD 12/5, Bandar Sri Damansara, 52200 Kuala Lumpur, with telephone +603-6279 8000, fax +603 6279 8022 and the Livista sales gallery on 03-6419 9858. The company’s 12-digit registration number is not printed anywhere, and neither is the name of any developer’s officer.
It matters that the licensee is not Land & General Berhad. Land & General Berhad, company number 5507-H, is the Bursa Malaysia Main Market parent; Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd is the subsidiary. Every portal gets this wrong in a specific way: EdgeProp’s listing contradicts itself inside one page, with a Developer field reading “Land & General Berhad” while its own description text says the developer is “Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd”; PropertyGuru does the same, naming Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd in one place and “Developed by Land And General Bhd” in its property-details block. The contracting party on your SPA, the party holding the housing development account, and the party against whom liquidated damages run is the subsidiary. Ask for the company number on the agreement and check that it reads 110516-H.
110516-H is an old-format registration number, consistent with a company incorporated in the mid-1980s — and that is the single most useful thing on this page for a cautious buyer. This is not a new project SPV set up for one launch. It is the original township special-purpose company that built Bandar Sri Damansara, and it is the same licensee behind Damansara Foresta, Damansara Seresta and the township’s separate price-controlled affordable scheme. A buyer is contracting with the entity that has carried this township for about four decades, under a parent listed on Bursa’s Main Market. That is real reassurance about counterparty depth — and it is not a substitute for the licence and permit particulars, which remain unpublished.
On the land and the masterplan. Livista’s own parcel is 3.02 acres — the site of the former Sri Damansara Clubhouse — reported by The Edge three times, and IQI’s 131,551 sq ft converts to 3.0200 acres exactly, so two independent figures agree. It is phase 1 of a five-phase masterplan running about 15 years with a reported RM1.1 billion gross development value, on a parcel published as 19.11 acres by The Edge and repeated in the developer’s own June 2026 advertorial — while StarProperty published 22 acres four days apart in the same season. Livista’s own GDV is reported at RM460 million by The Edge, StarProperty and the advertorial alike. The wider freehold commercial landbank the redevelopment unlocks was described in 2016 as 36 acres. No joint venture, no separate land-owning entity and no profit-share arrangement is named by any source — which is unusual in a good way, and is recorded as an absence rather than as a confirmation.
On construction, and on two contracts that are not this project’s. The myBina construction register carries this licensee’s Bandar Sri Damansara serviced-apartment project at “Construction – Piling & Foundation Works”, with substructure works on site as at 16 February 2024, recorded as 29 storeys and 344 units with the State as Selangor. The contractor and contract sum sit behind a paid wall, and no Bursa announcement names this employer at all. Said plainly because it is an easy and consequential mistake: the two Bandar Sri Damansara serviced-apartment construction contracts that are publicly announced — a Pesona Metro subsidiary’s RM264.3 million job and a Taghill RM494 million job — both name Indo Aman Bina Sdn Bhd, a TA Global company, as employer. Those belong to the Damansara Avenue siblings, a different developer and a different project, and neither is used on this page or may be attributed to Livista.
On the schools, which deserve a disclosure rather than a bullet point. The developer’s own distance table puts Sri Bestari International School and Sri Bestari Private School at 600 m, and myrumahbaru independently measures 593 m. Both schools are owned by the developer’s own group: L&G’s wholly owned Lang Education Sdn Bhd operates the private school, the international school and Manjaria Bestari Kindergarten, per L&G’s own media release of 29 May 2026. That is a genuine amenity and a related party, and both halves of that sentence are worth having.
On awards and certification, the honest answer is that nothing belongs to this project. The developer’s own awards page lists eight entries and not one is Livista’s. The 2018 iProperty best residential high-rise award belongs to Damansara Seresta; the 2016 IPA landscape award to Astoria Ampang; the 2013 IPA landscape awards to Damansara Foresta; the FIABCI Malaysia Property Award 1996 to the Bandar Sri Damansara township as a whole; and the remainder are company awards, including a 2019 Focus Malaysia award for Best Sustainability Reporting, which is a corporate-reporting award and not a building certification. Those may fairly be stated as what they are, attributed exactly like that — and none of them may be attached to Livista. On green rating, no claim of any kind is made for this project by anyone: no GBI, GreenRE, LEED, Green Mark or energy rating, and no green logo on it. The GBI gallery returned a 404 on search and a 500 on its directory; the GreenRE table returned truncated with no matching row. Both registry checks are inconclusive, which is not a negative — and since nothing was asserted, nothing is overstated. That is the cleanest possible version of this finding.
Two last details, small but telling. The developer misspells its own project in its own files twice: the e-book prints “Senses ark” for Senses Park, and the social-sharing image for the whole microsite is named “ogimg-livisa” — the site’s own share card is named after a misspelling of the project. And the licensee is filed at Level 18 of 8trium on the Livista material while the group site prints Level 21 of the same tower. None of that changes what you are buying. All of it shows that nobody reconciled the documents — which is exactly why this page checks each one against the others rather than retyping any single one of them.
Developer, land, masterplan, construction, school and award particulars read from the developer’s own microsite and both e-book editions, the myBina construction register, L&G’s own corporate and awards pages and its media release of 29 May 2026, The Edge Malaysia (Apr 2021, Oct/Nov 2023, Nov 2025 and the branded advertorial of 15 Jun 2026), StarProperty (Sep 2016 and Sep 2023), EdgeProp, PropertyGuru, myrumahbaru and IQI, all on 8 October 2026. Green Building Index and GreenRE registers checked the same day: no entry found and both checks inconclusive rather than negative. No KPKT filing for this project exists in publicly reachable form, and the two Bursa-announced Bandar Sri Damansara construction contracts were checked and excluded as belonging to a different developer and a different project.
Questions buyers actually ask about Livista @ Bandar Sri Damansara
Where exactly is Livista @ Bandar Sri Damansara, and is it in Selangor or Kuala Lumpur?
Is it a condominium or a serviced apartment, and is the title residential or commercial?
Is the APDL published, and is it current?
Who is the licensed developer — Land & General, or someone else?
How many units, and how many storeys?
What layouts are there, and is there a floor plan for each?
Are there office suites, SOHO or SOFO units mixed into the towers?
What is the price?
What is the maintenance charge?
When will it be completed?
Is it really low density?
How far is the MRT, and is the covered walkway built?
Is the unit furnished, with air-conditioning and a kitchen?
Which facilities are actually confirmed, and is there a surau?
Has it won any award, or does it have a green rating?
Can a foreigner buy here?
What percentage is built, and who is the contractor?
What does this page deliberately not publish?
Want the documents rather than the brochure?
I will send you the developer’s own two e-book editions and its unit and fixture schedules as published, the myBina construction register entry, and the named articles this page is built on — and I will put every blank on this page to Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd in writing on your behalf, starting with the APDL, the developer licence, the land title class and the filed building type.
Louis Koh · Director, LK Group Marketing · IQI Realty Sdn Bhd · Registered Estate Agency. This is marketing information. It is not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer.
Louis Koh
Director, LK Group Marketing · IQI Realty Sdn Bhd · Registered Estate Agency
I work Kuala Lumpur and Selangor new launches, and I publish the filed statutory particulars rather than the brochure copy — including, as here, where there is no filing at all, where the developer’s own e-book contradicts a paid advertorial published in its own name, and where my own agency network’s page is one of the ones carrying the wrong numbers. I would rather tell you that than let you find it. If a figure on this page matters to your decision, ask me for the document it came from and I will send it. If a blank on this page matters — and on this project the biggest ones do — I will go and ask the developer in writing.
Published 8 October 2026 · Last verified 8 October 2026 · Built from the developer’s own microsite and both e-book editions, the myBina construction register, L&G’s corporate and awards pages, The Edge Malaysia, StarProperty, EdgeProp, PropertyGuru, myrumahbaru and IQI, all read on 8 October 2026. No KPKT advertisement particulars, no developer licence number and no APDL exist in publicly reachable form for this project. This is marketing information. It is not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer.
Ask a specific question
If you would rather not use WhatsApp, use this. I answer them myself. Only your name and one contact method are required.
Developer: Land & General (3 developments on this site)
Where it is: Bandar Sri Damansara, Selangor