malaysiaproperty4u.com

Kamelia @ Bandar Sri Damansara, Selangor — RESIDENSI KAMELIA by Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd
Skip to content
Louis Koh · LK Group Marketing · IQI Realty — KL & Selangor new launches
EN|中文
Bandar Sri Damansara · Persiaran Meranti · Selangor

Kamelia @ Bandar Sri Damansara — the developer’s own filings call it RESIDENSI KAMELIA

One 26-storey block, 602 serviced apartments on a 2.31-acre parcel inside Land & General’s own Bandar Sri Damansara township. The licensed developer is SRI DAMANSARA SDN BHD (110516-H), a subsidiary of Bursa-listed Land & General Berhad — not the listed company itself, which is what one portal’s developer field wrongly says. And the honest centre of this page: not one statutory particular has ever been published for this project by anyone.

602 units · one block26 storeysAll 2-bed, 1-bath · 553 sq ft2.31 acres · about 261 units/acreNo developer licence number publishedNo APDL — lapse cannot be checkedNo price on this page
WhatsApp Louis about Residensi KameliaJump to the statutory register

I reply with the documents and the blanks, not a brochure.

The developer’s own micrositeits stat block, its by-level facilities schedule and its distance tables
Land & General’s Bursa media releases26 February and 29 May 2026, which name Residensi Kamelia
Named sources onlyThe Edge, StarProperty, EdgeProp, PropertyGuru — each credited where used
Nothing inventedevery blank below is printed as a blank
Elevated artist’s impression of the single 26-storey block at Kamelia @ Bandar Sri Damansara (Residensi Kamelia) by Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd, Bandar Sri Damansara, Petaling, Petaling Jaya, Selangor
The single 26-storey block. Artist’s impression; subject inferred from the developer’s file name.
Level 5 swimming pool artist’s impression at Kamelia @ Bandar Sri Damansara (Residensi Kamelia) by Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd, Bandar Sri Damansara, Petaling, Petaling Jaya, Selangor
Swimming pool — the one image subject the developer’s own Level 5 schedule corroborates.
Developer’s location map at Kamelia @ Bandar Sri Damansara (Residensi Kamelia) by Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd, Bandar Sri Damansara, Petaling, Petaling Jaya, Selangor
The developer’s own location map. A schematic: no coordinate, no lot number, no boundary.
Answer block

Kamelia @ Bandar Sri Damansara at a glance

Fourteen facts, each with the source that published it. Where nobody published a figure, the row says so instead of filling the gap — and on this project that is most of the statutory rows.

Name the developer itself uses
RESIDENSI KAMELIAMicrosite body copy and, more importantly, Land & General Berhad’s own Bursa-facing media releases of 26 Feb 2026 and 29 May 2026. Not verified against a filing — no KPKT filing for this project could be located at all. The developer’s own two sites carry four different names for one building.
Licensed developer
SRI DAMANSARA SDN BHD (110516-H)Printed twice on the developer’s own microsite, in the developer line and the copyright line. A subsidiary of Land & General Berhad, in the developer’s own words — the listed company is the parent, not the licensee. No new 12-digit SSM number is printed anywhere.
Total units
602Developer’s own stat block (“Total Units No.: 602 Units”), corroborated by StarProperty and EdgeProp. One portal’s prose says “64 double-storey homes”, which is template contamination — see the honesty section.
Blocks and storeys
1 block · 26 storeys“Total Storeys: 26 STOREYS” on the developer’s stat block; the single block is confirmed by PropertyGuru and by the developer’s own imagery. No filed Bilangan Tingkat exists.
Land area
2.31 acres“Land Size: 2.31 ACRES” on the developer’s stat block. Independently corroborated: IQI prints 100,623 sq ft, which converts to 2.3100 acres — the two agree exactly.
Density
About 261 units per acre602 ÷ 2.31 acres. This arithmetic is mine, and 2.31 acres is this project’s own parcel. A high-density product, and no source claims otherwise. Two wrong denominators are in circulation — see the honesty section.
Layout
553 sq ft · 2 bedrooms · 1 bathroomType A and Type A1, both the same. The only product in the building. EdgeProp says 549 sq ft on both types — a systematic 4 sq ft disagreement. About 51.4 m² is my conversion; the developer publishes no metric figure.
Approving authority (PBT)
Not published — MBPJ is inferredNo approving authority and no building plan approval reference is published by anyone. The Edge says the township comes under Majlis Bandaraya Petaling Jaya, in an article from April 2021 about 1,200 acres. Medium confidence at best.
State
Selangor — by weight of evidence, not by filingSix independent sources file it in Selangor; IQI alone files it in Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur because the postal code is 52200. A postcode is a Pos Malaysia delivery code, not a jurisdiction.
Tenure
Freehold — portal-sourced, not filedEdgeProp, PropertyGuru and IQI all say freehold, and The Edge calls the township freehold. The developer’s own microsite never states tenure, and no title, PT or lot number is published by anyone.
No. Lesen Pemaju · APDL
NOT PUBLISHED by anyoneNeither number, and neither validity period, exists in the public record. So whether the advertising permit is current or lapsed cannot be assessed at all. See the statutory register below for every route that was tried.
Price
Not published on this pageNo filed statutory Unit Selling Price range exists in the public record, and no government register carries one. What circulates is a portal headline and one subsale asking price — two publishers and one agency, no statutory source. This is marketing information. It is not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer. Ask me for the price list and the SPA.
Expected completion
No filed date — four answers in circulationIQI: 18 March 2028. EdgeProp header: 2028. EdgeProp description on the same page: December 2027. A year field on that record: 2027. The developer prints no completion date at all.
Sales gallery as published
Sales Gallery (Kamelia), THE FLO, Jalan Persiaran Perdana, Bandar Sri Damansara, 52200 Kuala LumpurThe developer’s own microsite, which gives a gallery address and an office address — and never gives the project site’s own street address, state, district or mukim.

Jump to what you came for

This page is organised the way a buyer actually asks questions — starting with the fact that the statutory paperwork for this project is not public anywhere.

The honest part

Eleven things about this project that do not add up — and the source for each

None of this is rumour. Every item below comes from the developer’s own website, from Land & General’s own Bursa-facing media releases, from a named published article, or from a portal record you can open yourself. Where the developer’s own two websites disagree with each other, both are shown.

📄

No statutory particulars exist publicly — and there is nowhere for them to hide

Malaysian law expects a licensed housing developer’s advertisement to carry filed particulars. For this project no developer licence number, no APDL, no licence or permit validity, no approving authority, no building plan reference, no land title or PT/lot number, no mukim, no filed building type, no filed completion date and no filed price band is published by anyone. And this is not a search failure: the microsite’s own WordPress page index returns exactly one page, the homepage. There is no statutory page, no disclaimer page and no terms page for a block to sit on. The sibling microsite and the corporate site were checked too — Land & General publishes no statutory block on any of its websites.

⚠

Whether the advertising permit has lapsed cannot be assessed

The usual test on these pages is to read the permit number and its validity period and check it against today’s date. Here there is no number and no validity period in existence publicly, not even a redacted placeholder, because there is no filing to carry one. So nothing on this page claims the permit is current. The only evidence the project is lawfully selling is circumstantial: Land & General’s media releases of 26 February and 29 May 2026 name Residensi Kamelia as an ongoing development recognising revenue and sales in FY2026. Strong circumstance. Not the document.

📍

Two unrelated projects are called Kamelia, and one portal carries both

This Kamelia is 602 serviced apartments in one 26-storey block in Bandar Sri Damansara by Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd. The other is 238 detached and terraced houses of 1,291 and 1,701 sq ft with four bedrooms, by KLK Land Sdn Bhd, in Kuala Selangor — EdgeProp record 53197, and PropertyGuru’s “Kamelia by KLK Land”, ID 22873. A third hub, “Residensi Camelia 2”, is unrelated again. EdgeProp’s own search collapses them. Nothing from any of those records is on this page. If you are reading specifications for four-bedroom houses, you have the Kuala Selangor project.

🏢

The developer is not the listed company, and one portal gets it wrong at law

EdgeProp’s developer field reads “Land & General Berhad”. That is the Bursa-listed holding company. The entity that holds the licence, signs your SPA and owes you liquidated damages is SRI DAMANSARA SDN BHD (110516-H), a subsidiary. EdgeProp’s own description text on the same page says Sri Damansara Sdn. Bhd. — so it contradicts itself within one page, and it repeats the identical error on the sibling Damansara Livista record. PropertyGuru gets it right; IQI names no developer at all. A buyer who thinks they are contracting with a listed company is mistaken.

🏷

Four names for one building, all from the developer’s own two websites

Residensi Kamelia on the microsite and in the media releases. Kamelia Bandar Sri Damansara on the corporate property index. DAMANSARA KAMELIA in the corporate register-interest dropdown — the only one that follows the house convention of Damansara Foresta, Seresta, Laverra and Livista. And, in the microsite’s own second paragraph, “Residence Kamelia”, a typo on its own project name. The same page prints “all righs reserved” and “Kindergarden”. EdgeProp coins a fifth name, Kamelia Residence, that appears on no developer material. Worth knowing before you trust any single figure on that microsite.

🗺

The state, and even the local council, are inference rather than filed fact

Six independent sources file this township’s developments in Selangor, and The Edge adds that the township is under MBPJ. IQI alone hard-codes Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur into its URL, because the postal code is 52200 Kuala Lumpur — and the developer itself writes “52200 Kuala Lumpur” for its own office and sales gallery. A postcode is a Pos Malaysia delivery code, not a jurisdiction. But The Edge’s MBPJ statement is about a 1,200-acre township in a 2021 article, not about this parcel, and the one document that would settle it — the building plan approval reference — is not published. So: Selangor on the weight of evidence; MBPJ at medium confidence; mukim, daerah and the plan reference not published at all.

🛡

Louis’s own agency’s page for this project is the contaminated one

This is uncomfortable to print and it belongs here anyway. The IQI Global page for Kamelia says the project “features 64 double-storey homes” — a 26-storey, 602-unit tower is not 64 double-storey homes. Its footer carries an unrelated section about Mantin, Negeri Sembilan. It hard-codes the state as Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, and it credits the project with a 5.21-acre park that cannot fit on the site. That page is template-contaminated and nothing from its prose is used here. What IQI does contribute, and it is useful, is a land-area field of 100,623 sq ft that independently corroborates the developer’s 2.31 acres.

🌳

The 5.21-acre park cannot be this project’s facility, and must never be the density denominator

IQI credits Kamelia with “5.21 acres of lifestyle park”. The whole site is 2.31 acres. A 5.21-acre park cannot sit inside it, and the developer’s own microsite does not mention it at all. The 5.21 acres is Senses Park, public open space on the MRT-station parcel — a township amenity, not a facility of this development. It matters arithmetically too: dividing 602 units by 5.21 acres gives 116 units per acre, less than half the true figure, and dividing by the township’s 1,200 acres gives half a unit per acre. Only 2.31 acres is this project’s own parcel, and the honest density is about 261 units per acre.

💰

“Affordable” is marketing here, not a statutory category

Land & General’s own publicity and the press call this an affordable serviced apartment project. But Kamelia carries no Rumah Selangorku, RSKU, RUMAWIP or Residensi Wilayah branding on any source, and a browse of Selangor’s LPHS eHartanah affordable-project register surfaced no Kamelia record and no Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd record — weak evidence rather than a clean negative, because that register ignores its own search parameter and returned unfiltered rows. A second reason to doubt a statutory classification: 553 sq ft is below the minimum built-up of both the Rumah Selangorku apartment types and the Residensi Wilayah programme. So no income ceiling, eligibility rule, quota or resale moratorium is published — and nobody states that none exists either.

🏋

The gym exists only in advertising prose, and a shop exists only on one portal

The developer’s own sentence promises you will “stay fit in the state-of-the-art gym”, and EdgeProp, PropertyGuru and IQI all tick a gym. It is absent from the developer’s own by-level facilities schedule — no level, no floor area, no equipment, and no gym image in a 42-item media library. The strongest-worded facility claim on the site is the least evidenced one. Separately, EdgeProp lists a “shop within the premises” that appears on no other source and is absent from the developer’s own ground-floor schedule. If retail lots exist they would be strata commercial parcels in the same building, and the HDA position — Schedule G, Schedule H or a non-HDA contract — is undocumented. Unresolved, and worth a written question.

🏆

Kamelia has won nothing, and the eight award logos in the file system belong to other projects

The developer’s media library holds eight award-logo images, and the live page renders no awards section at all — they are unused template leftovers. Read against Land & General’s own milestone register, every one belongs to the company or to a different project: FIABCI 1996 to the township, the 2013 landscape awards to Damansara Foresta, the 2016 landscape award to Astoria Ampang, iProperty IDEA 2018 to Damansara Seresta, and the Forbes, Edge, Focus Malaysia and Property Insight items at company level. Not one post-dates 2020, and Kamelia launched in 2024. Green certification: the developer claims nothing at all, and nothing was found — with the caveat that both registries were partly unavailable on 8 October 2026.

Project DNA

What is actually being built, and the dated record behind it

The statistics band carries only figures a named source published, with my own arithmetic flagged as mine. The facilities schedule is the developer’s own by-level list, which is better disclosure than most projects in this series and is credited as such — including the four floors it leaves out. The timeline is built from the developer’s Bursa-facing media releases and named reporting, because no filed dates exist.

602Units — developer’s stat block, StarProperty and EdgeProp agree
1Block — developer imagery and PropertyGuru
26Storeys — developer’s stat block; no filed figure
2.31Acres — developer, corroborated by a 100,623 sq ft field
~261Units per acre on its own parcel — my arithmetic, 602 ÷ 2.31
553Sq ft — the only size; EdgeProp says 549
14Facilities, on two levels — developer’s own schedule
4Floors nobody describes — Levels 1 to 4

Facilities — the developer’s own by-level schedule, and the four floors it leaves out

Credit where it is due: the developer publishes its facilities as a text schedule assigned to levels, not merely as a graphic, and no portal assigns levels at all. No facility is marked shell or space-only. What follows is that schedule as published, followed by what is claimed elsewhere but is not in it.

Ground Floor

As the developer assigns it
  • Guard House
  • Mail Room
  • Lift Lobby
  • Management Office
  • Kindergarden — the developer’s own spelling, reproduced as published
  • Child Care Centre
  • Surau (prayer room)
  • Multipurpose Room

Level 5

As the developer assigns it
  • Playground
  • Jogging Track
  • Changing Room
  • Swimming Pool
  • Wading Pool
  • Barbeque Areas

Levels 1, 2, 3 and 4

NOT PRINTED — by anyone
  • No source describes these four floors at all. For a 26-storey tower with 602 units and no published car park count, that is a four-floor hole in the published description. Podium parking is the natural reading and the developer never says so, so this page does not say it either.

Claimed somewhere, but absent from the developer’s own by-level schedule

No level assigned by anyone
  • Gymnasium — claimed in the developer’s own marketing sentence (“stay fit in the state-of-the-art gym”) and ticked by EdgeProp, PropertyGuru and IQI, but absent from the developer’s own by-level schedule. No level, no floor area, no equipment list, and no gym image in a 42-item media library. The only place this gym is committed is a sentence of advertising copy.
  • Landscaped gardens — the developer’s prose promises “the lush surroundings of our landscaped gardens” and its imagery is garden-themed, but no level, no area and no landscape architect is published.
  • “Shop within the premises” — EdgeProp alone lists retail. The developer’s own ground-floor schedule lists no shops. If retail lots exist they would be strata commercial parcels in the same building, which is a different legal animal from your home. Unresolved.
  • “Multipurpose hall” (EdgeProp) versus “Multipurpose Room” (the developer). A room and a hall are not the same commitment, so this page prints the developer’s word.
  • “BBQ pit”, singular (EdgeProp) versus “Barbeque Areas”, plural (the developer).
  • A 5.21-acre lifestyle park — IQI alone. Arithmetically impossible as a facility of this project, because the whole site is 2.31 acres. See the honesty section above.

Not published for facilities, therefore not on this page

Ask me and I will put it to Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd in writing
  • What Levels 1, 2, 3 and 4 contain. The developer assigns facilities to the Ground Floor and to Level 5 only. Four floors of a 26-storey tower are described by nobody at all.
  • Car park bays in total, bays per unit, motorcycle bays, visitor bays and EV charging provision — on a 553 sq ft product this is a first-order question and no source answers it
  • Lift count, lift capacity and the lift-to-unit ratio for 602 units
  • The gym: its level, its area and its equipment
  • The landscaped gardens: level, area, landscape architect, planting or hardscape schedule
  • Prayer-hall capacity; the kindergarten and child care centre operator and capacity, and whether either is a strata parcel sold to a third party or management common property
  • Security beyond the two words “Guard House” — no CCTV, no access control, no gated-and-guarded specification
  • Refuse chute or bin centre, laundry, co-working or study room, generator back-up, water tank capacity
  • Service charge and sinking fund rates, quit rent and assessment estimates, strata title timing and the management-corporation arrangements

Dated record — the developer’s own disclosures and named reporting, because no filed date exists

Mid-1990sLand & General begins developing Bandar Sri Damansara, a freehold township of about 1,200 acres at the Selangor–Kuala Lumpur border, now served by three MRT stations and a KTM station and neighboured by Damansara Perdana, Damansara Damai and Desa ParkCity (The Edge). The township, not this project, won the FIABCI Malaysia Property Award in 1996.
May 2024Every one of the 42 items in the project’s media library is registered on the microsite in this month. The library is artist impressions and graphics only — no show unit, no construction photography, no site plan, no elevation, no car-park plan, no gym image. The microsite’s copyright line reads 2024.
August 2024Pre-registration opens, reported by StarProperty, which describes Kamelia as an affordable serviced apartment project of 602 units.
FY25Launched during the financial year ended 31 March 2025 (Land & General corporate feature via Newswav). The group CEO’s stated focus is the mid-market and affordable segments — a group statement, not a statement about this project.
26 Feb 2026Land & General’s media release names Residensi Kamelia among the ongoing developments driving the quarter’s property results, alongside Damansara Livista and The Wyn Residences.
29 May 2026Land & General’s media release lists Residensi Kamelia as an ongoing development contributing to FY2026 property revenue recognition and sales. This is the strongest primary-source anchor that exists for the project, and it is also the only indirect evidence that a licence and permit are in force. The same release reports group unbilled sales and planned FY2027 launches — both group-level figures, neither attributable to Kamelia, so neither is printed here.
8 Oct 2026Every figure on this page verified against the developer’s own microsite, Land & General’s media releases and the named sources set out in the register below. Construction progress on this date: no photograph, no percentage complete and no milestone is published by any source.
Dec 2027EdgeProp’s own description text. Contradicted by the header on the same page.
2028EdgeProp’s header figure, and IQI gives a precise 18 March 2028. Four completion answers in circulation, none of them filed, and the developer prints none at all.
Ask me what has actually been built on site
Layouts

One product, 602 times — and the schedule that does not exist

There is no filed built-up schedule for this project, so there is no filed figure for built-up area, bedroom or bathroom count, car park allocation, or per-type unit count. What follows is the marketed schedule, with each source named and each disagreement shown. The developer does publish a per-type specification schedule, which is unusually good and is set out in full below.

Type A floor plan, 553 sq ft, 2 bedrooms, 1 bathroom at Kamelia @ Bandar Sri Damansara (Residensi Kamelia) by Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd, Bandar Sri Damansara, Petaling, Petaling Jaya, Selangor

Type A — 553 sq ft

2 bedrooms · 1 bathroom · unit count not published

553 sq ft — developer549 sq ft — EdgePropabout 51.4 m² — my conversion2 bed1 bathCar park: NOT PUBLISHED

The developer’s floor-plan section prints “Type A / 553 sq ft / 2 Bedrooms / 1 Bathroom” against this plan, which makes it the strongest-evidenced thing on the whole microsite — a caption rather than a file name. The built-up above comes from the developer’s floor-plan section and its type table, not from its marketing prose. EdgeProp publishes 549 sq ft for this type, a systematic four-square-foot difference that also affects Type A1, so it is not a typo on one row. This page uses 553 and attributes it. How many units are Type A is not published by anyone, and neither is any car park allocation.

Ask for the Type A plan at full resolution
The developer publishes a separate plan graphic for Type A1 and a stacking graphic for the floor plate. Neither is reproduced here, because no caption anywhere states what distinguishes A1 from A — so a plan would be shown without being able to say what you were looking at.

Type A1 — 553 sq ft

2 bedrooms · 1 bathroom · unit count not published

553 sq ft — developer549 sq ft — EdgeProp2 bed1 bathDifference from Type A: NOT PUBLISHED

Same bedrooms, same bathrooms, same built-up, same specification schedule. The developer publishes a separate floor-plan graphic for Type A1 and a stacking graphic for the floor plate, and no text anywhere on any source explains what differs. It is presumably orientation or position on the floor plate. This page does not guess, and nor does it invent a unit split: 602 over 26 storeys averages about 23 units per floor, and if Levels 1 to 4 are podium and Level 5 is the facilities deck then about 29 per residential floor — arithmetic resting on an unsourced assumption about Levels 1 to 5, so it is presented as arithmetic or not at all.

Ask what separates Type A1 from Type A
This is a text schedule on the developer’s microsite, not a drawing. It is reproduced here because it is the developer’s own commitment and it is the kind of disclosure most microsites do not make.

Specification schedule, as the developer publishes it

Per type, Type A and Type A1 — the developer’s own commitment, checkable at handover

Reinforced concrete structureAluminium-framed windows1 shower point · 1 WC9 lighting points2 air-conditioning points

Structure, wall and roofing: reinforced concrete, walls also brick. Windows: aluminium framed with glass. Doors: fire door and timber flush door. Sanitary fittings per unit: 1 shower point, 1 WC, 1 wash basin, 1 kitchen sink. Electrical points per unit: 9 lighting points, 3 ceiling fan points, 9 thirteen-amp socket outlets and 2 air-conditioning points, plus a TV point, door bell, water heater point, fibre socket and distribution box. Read honestly: a 2-bedroom unit with two air-conditioning points means one bedroom has no point unless the second serves the living area, and the developer does not say which rooms the two points serve. Worth asking rather than assuming.

Ask which rooms the two air-con points serve
Nothing to show. These are blanks, and they are printed as blanks.

What a filed built-up schedule would tell you — and does not, here

Not published by anyone

No filed scheduleNo finishes scheduleAsk me instead

Gross and net floor area as filed. The per-type unit split. Ceiling height and floor-to-floor height. Whether a balcony, yard or drying area exists at all — none is mentioned in any schedule. Orientation and view of either type. Whether units are bare, partly or fully fitted, and any finishes schedule at all: no floor tiles, kitchen cabinetry, wardrobes or sanitaryware brands are published. Total car park bays, bays per unit, motorcycle and visitor bays, EV charging. Lift count and lift-to-unit ratio for 602 units. Site plan, block layout, elevation drawings and car-park plan. None of these is published by the developer, in any Bursa filing, by any portal, or in any reachable registry record.

Send me these questions in writing

Measurement note, flagged as mine and not as filed fact: 553 sq ft is about 51.4 m² and 549 sq ft is about 51.0 m² — both conversions are mine, because the developer publishes no square-metre figure anywhere. PropertyGuru’s project hub prints a garbled built-up string from which 553 is recoverable; it is not cited here. No source claims a dual-key layout, and the developer’s own room list of two bedrooms, one bathroom, one kitchen sink and one WC would not support one. This is marketing information. It is not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer.

Location

Persiaran Meranti, Bandar Sri Damansara — and the one distance two sources disagree about

The pin below is a text search on the street and township, not a filed coordinate, because no source publishes GPS coordinates for this project. The only coordinates that surface in a Kamelia search belong to the unrelated Kuala Selangor project by another developer, and they are not used here. The street name itself comes from PropertyGuru and IQI — the developer’s own microsite never states the project site’s address.

Open in Google Maps
Persiaran Meranti, Bandar Sri Damansara — PropertyGuru and IQIState: Selangor — six sources against onePBT: MBPJ — inferred from township reporting onlyMukim, daerah, PT and lot number: NOT PUBLISHED

On the postcode, plainly: 52200 is a Pos Malaysia delivery code used on both sides of the Selangor–Kuala Lumpur boundary here, and the developer itself writes “Bandar Sri Damansara, 52200 Kuala Lumpur” for its own office and sales gallery. That is a postal city, not a jurisdiction, and it appears to be how one agency page came to hard-code the state as Wilayah Persekutuan. This page says Selangor.

The nearest MRT, both published answers

  • Sri Damansara West (Barat) MRT, Putrajaya Line, station code SSP168 — 500 m per the developer’s own distance table, 720 m and about a 9-minute walk per PropertyGuru’s measured walking distance. PropertyGuru is 44% further. Both are printed here because both were published.
  • IQI says “about 500 metres” — that is the developer’s own figure repeated, not an independent measurement, so it does not count as corroboration.
  • Three similarly named stations serve this township and must not be collapsed into one: Sri Damansara Barat (West, SSP168), Sri Damansara Sentral and Sri Damansara Timur (East, SSP169). EdgeProp names only West and East, omits Sentral entirely, and gives no distances at all.
  • On the second station the developer under-sells itself: it prints 3 km to Sri Damansara Sentral where PropertyGuru measures 1,598 m, about 19 to 20 minutes on foot — the developer’s figure is nearly double. That is the opposite of the usual bias and worth recording.
  • The developer also promises a “Cover walkway with connection of Pedestrian Link” and never says where it goes, how long it is, who builds it, or whether it exists yet. Treat it as an unquantified claim.

The developer’s own transport table

  • Sri Damansara West MRT — 500 m (see the two answers above)
  • Sri Damansara Sentral MRT — 3 km (PropertyGuru measures 1,598 m)
  • Sri Damansara East MRT — 4 km
  • Kepong Sentral KTM Komuter — 4 km
  • Damansara Damai MRT — 7 km
  • PropertyGuru additionally publishes 13 bus stops within 1 km, including Prima Saujana at the doorstep and 8Trium Damansara at 156 m.

Shopping, as the developer publishes it

  • The FLO Alfresco Street — 50 m. This is Land & General’s own retail street, and it is also where the Kamelia sales gallery is.
  • Star Grocer — 50 m
  • 8trium — 300 m. Also Land & General’s own office and retail development, and the building that houses the developer’s own head office.
  • Decathlon / Courts Mammoth — 300 m
  • Uniqlo Sri Damansara — 1 km
  • Lotus’s Menjalara — 5.2 km · Plaza Arkadia — 5.6 km · AEON Mall Metro Prima — 6 km
  • The Curve — 7.1 km · IKEA — 7.2 km · 1 Utama — 8.4 km

Education and medical, as the developer publishes it

  • Sri Bestari International School and Sri Bestari Private School — 600 m each. Sri Bestari is Land & General’s own school, opened 2020 per the group’s milestone page; say so rather than treating it as a third-party amenity.
  • SK Bandar Sri Damansara 2 — 850 m · SK Bandar Sri Damansara 1 — 1 km · SMK Bandar Sri Damansara 2 — 1.2 km · First City University College — 11.3 km
  • ParkCity Medical Centre — 5.9 km · Damansara Specialist Hospital 2 — 6 km · Damansara Damai Medical Centre — 6 km
  • Hospital Sungai Buloh — 7.2 km · Hospital Selayang — 8.8 km · Tropicana Medical Centre — 13.1 km
  • Honest note on completeness: the developer’s education and medical tables carry further entries between the figures above which were summarised rather than enumerated when the microsite was read. The lists above are therefore the verified subset, not the complete table, and no entry has been filled in from memory. Ask me and I will send you the developer’s tables in full.
  • Named by EdgeProp with no distance published anywhere: Krista Wangsa Permai, SK Bandar Baru Sri Damansara 2, Sekolah Sri Bestari, Aman Putri Dispensary, Klinik Kip and Klinik Surgeri Sri Damansara.

Distances nobody publishes — therefore not on this page

  • Any highway or interchange at all. No distance to the LDP, DASH, Penchala Link, NKVE, MRR2, Jalan Kuching or Sprint is published by the developer, by any portal or by anyone else. For a project whose entire pitch is connectivity, the absence of a single road distance on the developer’s own site is notable, and this page does not estimate one.
  • Kuala Lumpur city centre and KLCC · KL Sentral · KLIA and KLIA2 · Subang (Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah) airport
  • Nearest petrol station, police station, fire station, post office, wet market or hawker centre
  • Nearest public park. The only park figure in circulation is the 5.21-acre claim, which is Senses Park, public open space on the MRT-station parcel — outside this project’s 2.31-acre boundary, and arithmetically incapable of being inside it.
  • Nearest mosque — a Surau on the ground floor is not the same thing — and the nearest Klinik Kesihatan
  • Any international school other than Sri Bestari

Two warnings worth carrying on a public page. First, no GPS coordinate exists for this project in any source, and the only coordinates a Kamelia search returns belong to a different developer’s 238-house project in Kuala Selangor — they are not used here and must never be. Second, the one document that would settle MBPJ versus DBKL conclusively is the building plan approval reference, and it is not published by anyone; neither is the mukim, the daerah in filed form, or the PT or lot number. Density, stated honestly: 602 units on this project’s own 2.31-acre parcel is about 261 units per acre. Dividing the same 602 units by the 5.21-acre Senses Park parcel or by the township’s 1,200 acres produces a flattering figure that is arithmetic abuse, because neither of those is this project’s land.

The spine of this page

Statutory register — RESIDENSI KAMELIA, and the block that does not exist anywhere

Malaysian law requires a licensed housing developer to file and display statutory advertisement particulars, and that filing is public. For this project no such filing is publicly reachable — and this is the first project in this series where not one statutory particular has been published by anyone at all. So rather than pretend to a filing, the three columns below set out exactly what is missing, exactly what was tried in order to find it, and exactly what the developer does publish instead. Read them together. Column A is the as-filed block that ought to exist. Column B is every route that was attempted, so nobody has to repeat them. Column C is the whole of the developer’s own disclosure. The answer a buyer actually needs comes from two documents that are not on the internet: the price list and the SPA at the sales gallery.

(A) The as-filed block — every field, as it stands(B) Every route tried, so nobody repeats them(C) The developer’s own project microsite, in full
Nama Skim / Pemajuan NOT PRINTED — the developer’s own most formal name is Residensi Kamelia, which is not a filing
Pemaju (full name and registration number) NOT PRINTED in a filing. The microsite prints Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd (110516-H)
No. Lesen Pemaju NOT PRINTED
Tempoh sah lesen NOT PRINTED
No. Permit Iklan dan Jualan (APDL) NOT PRINTED
Tempoh sah APDL NOT PRINTED — so the lapse check cannot be performed at all
Pihak Berkuasa yang Meluluskan NOT PRINTED — MBPJ is inferred from township-level reporting only
No. Kelulusan Pelan Bangunan NOT PRINTED — the one document that would settle the local authority conclusively
Jenis Bangunan NOT PRINTED — four different labels circulate; see column C
Pegangan Tanah NOT PRINTED, and not stated by the developer either. Freehold comes from three portals plus township-level reporting
Hakmilik / PT / lot / mukim / daerah NOT PRINTED
Sekatan Kepentingan NOT PRINTED
Bebanan / chargee NOT PRINTED — no bank, charge or caveat is named by any source
Jumlah Unit (and per block) NOT PRINTED in a filing. 602 in one block comes from the developer’s stat block
Bilangan Tingkat NOT PRINTED in a filing. 26 comes from the developer’s stat block
Tempat Letak Kereta NOT PRINTED
Tarikh Dijangka Siap NOT PRINTED by the developer; four unfiled answers circulate
Harga Jualan Unit (minima–maksima) NOT PRINTED. No filed statutory band exists in the public record, and no government register carries one
Jadual keluasan binaan NOT PRINTED in a filing
Keluasan Tanah NOT PRINTED in a filing. 2.31 acres / 100,623 sq ft comes from the developer and is corroborated by an agency land field
Jadual Perjanjian (G / H / I / J) NOT PRINTED — do not assume Schedule H
Diskaun Bumiputera NOT PRINTED — there is no filed field, so there is nothing to withhold		Developer licence serial, needed to walk the KPKT HIMS filed-advertisement path — not published by any source, so the walk could not be attempted
KPKT HIMS indexed brochure search — no hit for Kamelia or Residensi Kamelia
KPKT TEDUH developer page for Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd — no indexed page found; the route needs the same serial
The usual portal route, where a portal transcribes the licence serial — FAILED here. The EdgeProp record for this project prints no developer licence number, no APDL, no approving authority and no building plan reference. Checked twice. Its sibling Damansara Livista record is equally bare, so this portal does not transcribe licence serials for this developer’s projects at all
The developer’s own statutory page — does not exist. The microsite’s own content index returns exactly one page: the homepage. No statutory page, no disclaimer page, no terms page. There is nowhere for a block to hide
The sibling microsite and the corporate site — checked for the same reason, because this developer reuses templates. Neither carries a developer-licence page, an APDL page or a buyer-guide statutory block. Land & General publishes no statutory block on any of its websites
Selangor LPHS eHartanah affordable-project register — no Kamelia row and no Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd row. Weak evidence, not a clean negative: that register ignores its own search parameter and returned unfiltered rows. It is an affordable-schemes register in any case
Government open data — aggregate statistics on licences and permits issued only; no project-level register
Bursa Malaysia contract awards — no award naming Kamelia found on Bursa, klsescreener, The Edge or EdgeProp. Two contractor leads were checked and both are different projects
Construction database — a same-developer, same-township record exists for a Serviced Apartment @ Bandar Sri Damansara (Phase 2) at 29 storeys and 344 units, against Kamelia’s 26 and 602. A different scheme; none of its contractor, consultant or lot details may be attributed here, and its developer and lot fields are behind a subscription in any case
Green registries — the GreenRE platform reported itself temporarily unavailable and returned zero rows for the entire register; the GBI directory returned a server error. Inconclusive, not a negative — and the developer claims nothing to check		What the developer publishes, in total: its company name and registration number, its office address, a telephone and fax number, a privacy-policy link, three summary statistics, a by-level facilities schedule, a per-type specification schedule, four distance tables, two floor-plan graphics and a page of marketing prose. That is the entire statutory-adjacent content of the microsite
Land Size 2.31 ACRES · Total Storeys 26 STOREYS · Total Units No. 602 Units
Developer line SRI DAMANSARA SDN BHD (110516-H) — A Subsidiary Of Land & General Berhad
Office address as printed 8trium, Level 18, Menara 1, Jalan Cempaka SD 12/5, Bandar Sri Damansara, 52200 Kuala Lumpur
Sales gallery as printed Sales Gallery (Kamelia), THE FLO, Jalan Persiaran Perdana, Bandar Sri Damansara, 52200 Kuala Lumpur
The project site’s own street address, state, daerah, mukim, PT or lot number, and PBT NOT STATED ANYWHERE ON THE MICROSITE
Building type never stated in words by the developer. The circulating labels are “Service Residence”, “service apartments”, “Condominium/Apartment”, and “Highrise” with Category: Commercial
Tenure never stated by the developer
Completion date never stated by the developer
Price never stated by the developer
Car park never stated by the developer, and not in the per-type specification schedule either, which does list sanitary and electrical points — a material omission on a 553 sq ft product
Levels 1 to 4 never described by the developer, or by anyone else
Gymnasium in the marketing prose; absent from the developer’s own by-level schedule
Awards eight award logos sit in the media library; the live page renders no awards section, and every logo belongs to the company or to a different project
Green certification no green, sustainability, energy or water claim of any kind
Proofreading the same page prints “Residence Kamelia” for its own project name, “Kindergarden”, and “all righs reserved” — worth knowing before trusting any single figure on it

Column A is not a gap this page papered over — it is the finding. Between them the developer, its Bursa-listed parent, three property portals, one agency and two government registries publish no developer licence number, no advertising and sales permit, no approving authority, no building plan reference, no land title and no filed price band for this project. The practical consequence for you is specific: you cannot verify from any public source that the licence and the permit are current, you cannot check a marketed price against a filed band because there is no band, and you cannot confirm which local authority approved the building. All three are answerable — by asking Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd for its licence and permit numbers in writing and verifying them on the KPKT TEDUH portal, and by reading the price list and the SPA at the sales gallery. That is what I will do with you.

No price appears in this register, because no filed statutory Unit Selling Price minimum and maximum exists in the public record for this project, and no government price register carries one. What circulates is a portal headline figure repeated by a second portal and one agency page, plus a single subsale asking price from one agent listing on a portal that simultaneously reports zero sale transactions in the last twelve months. On an independence check that reduces to two publishers and one agency, with no government or statutory source at all. Louis’s standing rule is the SPA price and nothing else, and nothing where the price cannot be established — so this page carries no figure. This is marketing information. It is not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer.

Can a foreigner buy here?

On the weight of evidence this project is in Selangor, where the thresholds for foreign purchase are: Zone 1 and Zone 2 — RM2,000,000, and strata property and gated landed strata only; Zone 3, meaning Hulu Selangor and Sabak Bernam — RM1,000,000. Kuala Lumpur and the Federal Territory sit at RM1,000,000 with EPU consent. That contrast is exactly why the Selangor-versus-Kuala-Lumpur question on this page is not academic — the two jurisdictions carry different thresholds and different consent routes, and the state here is an inference from six sources rather than a filed fact. A 553 sq ft unit at this project’s positioning is very unlikely to clear the Selangor RM2,000,000 threshold, so a foreign buyer should expect the answer to be no. Because no source states the foreign-ownership position for this project explicitly, this page asserts nothing. Ask me and I will put it to the developer in writing.

Construction progress — what percentage is built?

No built-percentage figure is published by any source — not by the developer, not by its listed parent in either media release, not by any portal, and not in any reachable registry record. No dated site progress photograph exists either: the developer’s entire 42-item media library is artist impressions and graphics registered in May 2024, with no construction photography at all. What is on the record is indirect: Land & General’s media releases of 26 February and 29 May 2026 name Residensi Kamelia as an ongoing development contributing to FY2026 property revenue recognition and sales. For a project at that stage, the complete absence of published physical progress is itself worth knowing. Ask me and I will go and look.

What this page does not publish, and why

Louis’s standing policy, applied to every project page on this site: no discount, no rebate, no nett price, no promotion, no freebie, no incentive, no commission, no Bumiputera figure, no leaseback or guaranteed-rental rate, and no yield or ROI projection is published here, ever. Those are matters for a conversation, where they can be stated accurately and for your specific case rather than scraped off a page months later. Beyond that, this page leaves blank everything no named source published: the developer licence and APDL numbers and their validity, the approving authority and the building plan approval reference, the land title, PT or lot number and mukim, the restriction in interest and any charge over the land, the filed building type and tenure, the schedule the SPA runs under, the filed completion and vacant possession dates, liquidated damages, the housing development account and the DLP, any filed price band, the service charge and sinking fund, quit rent and assessment, strata title timing and the management-corporation arrangements, the per-type unit split, the take-up rate, the project-level gross development value, car park bays and ratios, what Levels 1 to 4 contain, the gym’s level and area, lift counts and ratios, ceiling heights, the fitting-out level and any finishes schedule, balcony or yard, orientation, the site plan, elevations and car-park plan, every contractor and consultant, the kindergarten and child-care operators and whether either is a strata parcel, the security specification, and where the pedestrian link goes. One more, specifically: a project-level gross development value was reported in the press in 2024 and this page does not print it either, because dividing it by 602 units manufactures an implied average price with no filed band to check it against, and an implied price is still a price. Every one of these is a question I will put to Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd in writing for you.

Developer

Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd (110516-H), a Land & General subsidiary — and why the distinction matters

The licensed developer of Residensi Kamelia is SRI DAMANSARA SDN BHD, company registration number 110516-H. That name and number are printed twice on the developer’s own microsite — once in the developer line, SRI DAMANSARA SDN BHD (110516-H) / A Subsidiary Of Land & General Berhad, and again in the copyright line. The number is an old-format Companies Act number, and no new 12-digit SSM registration number is printed anywhere by anyone. The microsite files the developer’s office at 8trium, Level 18, Menara 1, Jalan Cempaka SD 12/5, Bandar Sri Damansara, 52200 Kuala Lumpur, with a telephone and fax number, and the sales gallery at THE FLO, Jalan Persiaran Perdana, in the same township.

It matters that the licensee is not Land & General Berhad. Land & General Berhad is the Bursa-listed holding company; Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd is the subsidiary that holds the developer’s licence, signs your SPA, owes you liquidated damages if the building is late, and against which any statutory recourse runs. EdgeProp’s developer field for this project nevertheless reads “Land & General Berhad”, which is wrong at law — and its own description text on the same page correctly reads “Sri Damansara Sdn. Bhd.”, so the page contradicts itself. The identical error appears on its record for the sibling Damansara Livista. PropertyGuru names the subsidiary correctly; IQI names no developer at all. When the agreement is in front of you, check that the company number reads 110516-H, and ask to see that company’s developer licence.

On the group behind it: Land & General has developed Bandar Sri Damansara, a freehold township of about 1,200 acres, since the mid-1990s, per The Edge’s township cover story, which also places the township at the Selangor–Kuala Lumpur border and under Majlis Bandaraya Petaling Jaya. Several of the amenities in the location section are the group’s own assets — The FLO retail street at 50 m, 8trium at 300 m, and Sri Bestari school at 600 m — and this page says so rather than presenting them as independent third-party amenities. They are genuine amenities and they are also the developer’s own. No joint venture, landowner-developer arrangement or profit or unit share is published by anyone for this parcel; because it sits inside the group’s own township, an in-house landbank parcel is the natural reading, and that is inference, not a sourced statement.

On what the group says about this project in its own Bursa-facing disclosures: the media releases of 26 February 2026 and 29 May 2026 both name Residensi Kamelia as an ongoing development, the second explicitly as contributing to FY2026 property revenue recognition and sales. They give no land title, no PT or lot number, no mukim or daerah, no tenure and no completion date, and the group-level unbilled sales and planned launch figures in them are not attributable to this project, so they are not printed here. These releases are useful for exactly two things: they prove the project is live and selling, and they are the only reason this page can say even circumstantially that a licence and a permit are likely to be in force.

On contractors and consultants, the honest answer is nobody is named. No main contractor, piling contractor, architect, C&S or M&E engineer, quantity surveyor, master planner, landscape architect or interior designer is published for Kamelia by any source, and no Bursa contract award naming Kamelia was found. Two leads were checked and ruled out: a 2018 award for two 21-storey blocks in Damansara Damai under a different group employer, and a contractor’s own listing of Ativo Suites in this township at 668 units over two blocks of 33 and 28 storeys. Neither is Kamelia. A construction database also carries a same-developer, same-township record for a Serviced Apartment @ Bandar Sri Damansara (Phase 2) at 29 storeys and 344 units — against Kamelia’s 26 storeys and 602 units. It is a different scheme and nothing from it is borrowed here.

On awards and green certification, the honest category is nothing. Residensi Kamelia has won nothing. The developer’s media library contains eight award-logo images and the live page renders no awards section at all — they are unused template leftovers. Read against Land & General’s own milestone register, each belongs elsewhere: the FIABCI Malaysia Property Award 1996 to the township; International Property Awards 2013 for landscape architecture, Malaysia and Asia Pacific, to Damansara Foresta; the 2016 residential landscape award to Astoria Ampang; iProperty IDEA 2018 for best residential high-rise to Damansara Seresta; and Forbes Asia Best Under A Billion 2014, The Edge Top Property Developers 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020, Focus Malaysia Best Under Billion 2019 and Property Insight Top 100 2019/2020 at company level. Not one post-dates 2020 and Kamelia launched in 2024. On green: the developer makes no green, sustainability, GBI, GreenRE, energy or water claim of any kind, and none was found — with the caveat that both public registries were partly unavailable on 8 October 2026. Note also that the group’s 2019 Best Sustainability Reporting award is a corporate reporting award, not a building certification, and the two must not be confused.

Developer particulars read from the developer’s own project microsite, from Land & General’s media releases of 26 February and 29 May 2026, and from the group’s own corporate milestone register, all on 8 October 2026. Award attributions are taken from that milestone register, project by project. GreenRE and the Green Building Index directory were checked the same day; both were partly unavailable, which is recorded as inconclusive rather than as a negative.

FAQ

Questions buyers actually ask about Residensi Kamelia

Where exactly is Kamelia @ Bandar Sri Damansara, and is it in Selangor or Kuala Lumpur?
On Persiaran Meranti, Bandar Sri Damansara, inside Land & General’s own township. The street name comes from PropertyGuru and IQI — the developer’s own microsite never states the project site’s street address, state, district or mukim at all. On the state: six independent sources file it in Selangor (EdgeProp, PropertyGuru, myBina’s township records, Newswav reporting the developer, StarProperty’s own URL taxonomy and Pesona Metro’s project page), and IQI alone files it in Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, hard-coded into its URL. The likely cause is the postcode: 52200 is a Pos Malaysia delivery code used on both sides of the boundary, and the developer itself writes “Bandar Sri Damansara, 52200 Kuala Lumpur” for its own office and sales gallery. A postcode is not a jurisdiction. This page says Selangor as the weight of evidence, not as filed fact, because no filed document for this project is publicly reachable.
Which local council approves it — MBPJ or DBKL?
Nobody publishes an answer. The Edge’s township cover story says Bandar Sri Damansara “comes under the jurisdiction of Majlis Bandaraya Petaling Jaya (MBPJ)” — but that is a statement about a 1,200-acre township in an article from April 2021, not about this parcel, and the same article also says the township sits “at the border between Selangor and Kuala Lumpur” without reconciling the two. No approving authority (Pihak Berkuasa yang Meluluskan) and no building plan approval reference (No. Kelulusan Pelan Bangunan) is published by the developer, by its listed parent, by any portal or by any registry. The building plan reference is the one document that would settle it conclusively, and it is nowhere. So MBPJ is medium confidence at best, inferred from township-level reporting, and this page says so rather than printing it as a fact.
What is the registered scheme name?
RESIDENSI KAMELIA is the developer’s own most formal name: it appears in the microsite body copy and, more importantly, in Land & General Berhad’s own Bursa-facing media releases of 26 February 2026 and 29 May 2026. But be clear about the strength of that: no KPKT filing for this project could be located at all, so Residensi Kamelia is the developer’s name, not a verified registered name. The developer’s own two websites carry four different names for one building — Residensi Kamelia (microsite and media releases), Kamelia Bandar Sri Damansara (corporate property index), DAMANSARA KAMELIA (corporate register-interest dropdown) and, once, by mistake, “Residence Kamelia”. EdgeProp coins a fifth, “Kamelia Residence”, which appears on no developer material. Quote Residensi Kamelia with the licensee’s name and company number when you enquire or apply for a loan.
Is this the Kamelia with the landed houses?
No, and this is the most dangerous confusion on this project. There are two unrelated Malaysian developments called Kamelia. This one is one 26-storey block of 602 serviced apartments in Bandar Sri Damansara by Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd. The other is 238 detached and terraced houses of 1,291 and 1,701 sq ft, four bedrooms, by KLK Land Sdn Bhd, in Kuala Selangor, 45000 — carried by EdgeProp as record 53197 and by PropertyGuru as “Kamelia by KLK Land”, ID 22873. There is also a third, unrelated hub, “Residensi Camelia 2”. Nothing from any of those records appears on this page, and if a search engine sends you specifications for 1,291 sq ft four-bedroom houses, you are reading about the Kuala Selangor project.
Who is the licensed developer? Is it Land & General Berhad?
No. The licensed developer is SRI DAMANSARA SDN BHD, company registration number 110516-H, printed twice on the developer’s own microsite — in the developer line and again in the copyright line. Land & General Berhad is the Bursa-listed holding company, and Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd is a subsidiary of it, in the developer’s own words. The entity that holds the developer’s licence, signs your SPA and owes you liquidated damages is the subsidiary, not the listed company. EdgeProp’s developer field says “Land & General Berhad”, which is wrong at law — and EdgeProp’s own description text on the same page correctly says “Sri Damansara Sdn. Bhd.”, so it contradicts itself within one page. EdgeProp makes the identical error on the sibling Damansara Livista record. PropertyGuru gets it right; IQI names no developer at all. Check that the company number on your agreement reads 110516-H. Note also that no new 12-digit SSM registration number is printed anywhere — only the old-format number.
Is the developer’s licence number and the APDL published anywhere?
No, and this is the most important thing on this page. Not one statutory particular has ever been published for this project by anyone. No developer licence number (No. Lesen Pemaju), no licence validity period, no APDL number, no permit validity period, no approving authority, no building plan approval reference, no land title, PT or lot number, no mukim, no restriction in interest, no charge or chargee, no filed building type, no filed completion date and no filed Unit Selling Price range is published by the developer, by Land & General Berhad, in any Bursa filing, by any portal, or by any government registry that could be reached. And it is not hiding: the microsite’s own WordPress index returns exactly one page — the homepage — so there is no statutory-block page, no disclaimer page and no terms page for it to sit on. The sibling microsite and the corporate site were checked too, and Land & General publishes no statutory block on any of its websites. The KPKT HIMS filed-advertisement path needs a developer licence serial that nobody publishes, and the usual portal route fails here: EdgeProp transcribes no licence serial for Land & General projects, on this record or on its sibling. Ask Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd for its licence and permit numbers and verify them on the KPKT TEDUH portal before you pay anything.
Has the advertising permit lapsed?
That question cannot be answered, by anyone, from the public record. There is no APDL number and no permit validity period in existence publicly — not even as a redacted placeholder, because there is no filing to carry one. So nothing on this page states or implies that the permit is current, and nothing here passes a developer-licence validity off as permit validity, because neither is known. The only evidence that the project is lawfully advertising and selling is indirect and circumstantial: Land & General’s own media releases of 26 February 2026 and 29 May 2026 name Residensi Kamelia as an ongoing development recognising property revenue and sales in FY2026. A Bursa-listed group recognising revenue on a project is strong circumstantial evidence that a licence and a permit are in force. It is not the document, and this page will not pretend it is.
What is the price?
This page publishes no price, deliberately. There is no filed statutory Unit Selling Price minimum and maximum anywhere in the public record, because no KPKT advertisement filing for this project could be located at all, and no government price register carries it either. What is in circulation is a portal headline figure, repeated by a second portal and by one agency page, plus a single subsale asking price from one agent listing — and on the same portal page, zero sale transactions in the last 12 months. On an independence check those reduce to two publishers and one agency, with no government or statutory source at all, and none of them is an SPA price. Louis’s standing rule is to publish the SPA price and nothing else, and to publish nothing when the price cannot be established — so there is no figure here. A project-level gross development value was reported in the press in 2024; this page does not print that either, because dividing it by 602 units manufactures an implied average price with no filed band to check it against. This is marketing information. It is not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer. The figures that govern what you pay are the price list and the SPA at the sales gallery, and I will send you both.
How many units, how many storeys, and how dense is it?
602 units in one block of 26 storeys on a 2.31-acre parcel. Units and storeys come from the developer’s own stat block (“Total Units No.: 602 Units”, “Total Storeys: 26 STOREYS”, “Land Size: 2.31 ACRES”), with 602 corroborated by StarProperty and EdgeProp and the single block by PropertyGuru. The land area is corroborated independently: IQI prints 100,623 sq ft, which converts to 2.3100 acres — the two agree exactly. Density therefore works out at 602 ÷ 2.31 = about 261 units per acre, and that arithmetic is mine, not a published figure. It is a high-density product and nobody claims otherwise — no source describes Kamelia as low-density, exclusive, limited or boutique, which is worth saying because this series usually has a superlative to debunk. Two wrong denominators are in circulation: IQI’s 5.21-acre park gives 116 units per acre, and the 1,200-acre township gives half a unit per acre. Only 2.31 acres is this project’s own parcel.
What layouts are there?
One product, 602 times: 2 bedrooms, 1 bathroom, 553 sq ft. Both the developer and EdgeProp publish exactly two type codes, Type A and Type A1, and both are 2-bed / 1-bath at the same built-up. There is no studio, no office suite, no SOHO, no dual key and no larger unit. Two honest caveats. First, the built-up disagrees: the developer says 553 sq ft on both types and EdgeProp says 549 sq ft on both types — a systematic four-square-foot difference, not a typo on one row. This page uses 553 sq ft and attributes it to the developer; at this size four square feet is 0.7%, immaterial to you and material to a page that claims accuracy. PropertyGuru prints a garbled string from which 553 is recoverable but which should not be cited. The metric conversion, about 51.4 m², is mine — the developer publishes no square-metre figure at all. Second, what actually differs between Type A and Type A1 is published by nobody. Same bedrooms, same bathrooms, same built-up, same specification schedule; the developer publishes a separate plan graphic for each and no text anywhere explaining the difference. It is probably orientation or position on the floor plate. This page does not guess, and the number of units of each type is not published either.
What is actually in the unit?
The developer publishes a per-type specification schedule, which is unusually good disclosure for a Malaysian microsite and is credited as such. Structure, walls and roofing in reinforced concrete, walls also brick; aluminium-framed windows with glass; fire door and timber flush doors. Sanitary fittings for Type A and A1: 1 shower point, 1 WC, 1 wash basin, 1 kitchen sink. Electrical: 9 lighting points, 3 ceiling fan points, 9 thirteen-amp socket outlets and 2 air-conditioning points, plus a TV point, door bell, water heater point, fibre socket and distribution box. Read that honestly: a 2-bedroom unit with 2 air-conditioning points means one of the two bedrooms has no air-conditioning point unless the second point serves the living area, and the developer does not say which rooms the two points serve. Worth asking, rather than assuming. Beyond that points schedule no finishes schedule is published at all — no floor tiles, kitchen cabinetry, wardrobes or sanitaryware brands, no ceiling height, no balcony, yard or drying area in any schedule, and no statement of whether units are bare, partly or fully fitted.
What facilities are there, and on which floor?
Credit where it is due: the developer publishes a by-level facilities schedule in text, not merely as a graphic, and it is the only level-assigned schedule in existence — no portal assigns levels. Ground Floor: Guard House, Mail Room, Lift Lobby, Management Office, Kindergarden (the developer’s spelling), Child Care Centre, Surau and Multipurpose Room. Level 5: Playground, Jogging Track, Changing Room, Swimming Pool, Wading Pool and Barbeque Areas. Levels 1, 2, 3 and 4 are described by nobody at all — four floors of a 26-storey tower, presumably podium parking, but the developer never says so and no car park bay count, ratio or motorcycle or visitor bay figure is published by anyone. And one gap worth naming: the gym is in the developer’s marketing sentence and in every portal’s tick-list, but not in the developer’s own by-level schedule, with no level, no area, no equipment list and no gym image in a 42-item media library. The only place that gym is committed is a line of advertising copy.
How far is the MRT really?
Somewhere between 500 and 720 metres, depending on whose figure you take — and this page prints both rather than choosing the flattering one. The developer’s own distance table says 500 m to Sri Damansara West MRT station. PropertyGuru publishes its own measured walking distance of 720 m, about a 9-minute walk — 44% further. IQI repeats the developer’s 500 m, so it is not independent corroboration. Be careful which station is meant: there are three similarly named Putrajaya Line stations in this township — Sri Damansara Barat (West, SSP168), Sri Damansara Sentral and Sri Damansara Timur (East, SSP169) — and they must not be collapsed into one. EdgeProp names only West and East, omits Sentral entirely and gives no distances at all. Interestingly, on the second station the developer under-sells itself: it prints 3 km to Sri Damansara Sentral where PropertyGuru measures 1,598 m, about a 19 to 20 minute walk. The developer also promises a “Cover walkway with connection of Pedestrian Link” and never says where it goes, how long it is, who builds it, or whether it exists yet.
Is it an affordable-housing scheme? Are there eligibility rules?
“Affordable” here is the developer’s price positioning, not a statutory category. Land & General’s own publicity and the press call it an affordable serviced apartment project, but Kamelia carries no Rumah Selangorku, RSKU, RUMAWIP or Residensi Wilayah branding on any source, and a search of Selangor’s LPHS eHartanah affordable-project register surfaced no Kamelia record and no Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd record. Honest caveat on that search: eHartanah ignores its own search parameter and returned unfiltered rows, so it is weak evidence rather than a clean negative. What it does establish is that the register is browsable and this project did not appear in it. A second reason to doubt a statutory classification: 553 sq ft is below the minimum built-up of both the Rumah Selangorku apartment types and the Residensi Wilayah programme. So no income ceiling, eligibility rule, quota, resale moratorium or state consent-to-transfer requirement is published — and equally, nobody states that none exists. Treat it as a question for the developer, in writing.
When will it be completed?
No filed completion date exists, and there are four different answers in circulation. IQI gives a precise 18 March 2028; EdgeProp’s header says 2028; EdgeProp’s own description on the same page says December 2027; and a year field on that record reads 2027. The developer’s own microsite prints no completion date at all. So EdgeProp contradicts itself within one page, and the only precise date in existence comes from an agency listing rather than from the developer. There is no filed Tarikh Dijangka Siap to arbitrate, and no vacant possession date from the developer. Ask for the date written into the SPA; that is the only one with a DLP and liquidated damages behind it. For what it is worth on physical progress: no progress photograph, no percentage complete and no piling or superstructure milestone is published by any source, and the developer’s entire 42-item media library is artist impressions and graphics dated May 2024.
Is it freehold?
Probably, but not from a primary source. Freehold is stated by EdgeProp, PropertyGuru and IQI, and The Edge describes the surrounding township as a freehold township of 1,200 acres. That is three portals plus township-level reporting — and the developer’s own microsite never states tenure at all, no filing is reachable, and no land title number, PT or lot number or mukim is published by anyone. If freehold is correct, no lease-expiry question arises. This page records it as portal-sourced, not filed, and the title search at your solicitor’s office is what settles it.
Can a foreigner buy here?
On the weight of evidence this project is in Selangor, where the state thresholds for foreign purchase are: Zone 1 and Zone 2 — RM2,000,000, and strata property and gated landed strata only; Zone 3, meaning Hulu Selangor and Sabak Bernam — RM1,000,000. For contrast, Kuala Lumpur and the Federal Territory sit at RM1,000,000 with EPU consent — which is exactly why the Selangor-versus-KL question above is not academic: the two jurisdictions have different thresholds and different consent routes. A 553 sq ft unit at this price positioning is very unlikely to clear the Selangor RM2,000,000 threshold, so a foreign buyer should expect the answer to be no in Selangor. But because the state is itself an inference here and no source states the foreign-ownership position for this project explicitly, this page asserts nothing. Ask me and I will put it to Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd in writing.
Has it won awards, or is it green-certified?
Kamelia has won nothing, and nothing green is claimed for it. This needs saying because the developer’s media library contains eight award-logo images — and the live page renders no awards section at all, so they are unused template leftovers. Cross-read against Land & General’s own milestone register, every one of them belongs to the company or to a different project: the FIABCI Malaysia Property Award 1996 to the township; International Property Awards 2013 for landscape architecture to Damansara Foresta; the 2016 residential landscape award to Astoria Ampang; iProperty IDEA 2018 to Damansara Seresta; and Forbes Asia Best Under A Billion 2014, The Edge Top Property Developers 2017 to 2020, Focus Malaysia Best Under Billion 2019 and Property Insight Top 100 2019/2020 at company level. Not one post-dates 2020, and Kamelia was not launched until 2024. On green: the developer makes no green, sustainability, GBI, GreenRE, energy or water claim of any kind, and none was found — with the honest caveat that both public registries were partly unavailable when checked on 8 October 2026 (GreenRE’s platform reported itself temporarily unavailable and returned zero rows for the whole register; the GBI directory returned a server error). So the honest category is nothing claimed and nothing found, which is cleaner than a logo with no rating. Note too that Land & General’s 2019 Best Sustainability Reporting award is a corporate reporting award, not a building certification; do not let the two be confused.
Who built it, and who designed it?
Not published by anyone. No main contractor, piling contractor, architect, C&S engineer, M&E engineer, quantity surveyor, master planner, landscape architect or interior designer is named for Kamelia by any public source, and no Bursa contract award naming Kamelia was found on Bursa, klsescreener, The Edge or EdgeProp. Two contractor leads were checked and both are different projects: a 2018 Inta Bina award for two 21-storey blocks in Damansara Damai for a different group employer, and Pesona Metro’s Ativo Suites in this township (668 units, 33 and 28 storeys, two blocks). Neither is Kamelia. There is also a same-developer, same-township record on myBina for a “Serviced Apartment @ Bandar Sri Damansara (Phase 2)” at 29 storeys and 344 units — against Kamelia’s 26 and 602, so it is a different scheme and none of its contractor or consultant details may be attributed here. Also unpublished: any joint venture, landowner arrangement or profit share. The parcel sits inside Land & General’s own township, so an in-house landbank parcel is the natural reading — that is inference, not a sourced statement.
Is the building residential, or is part of it commercial?
Undetermined, and it matters. The developer’s own microsite never states a building type in words. The labels in circulation are “Service Residence” (PropertyGuru), “service apartments” (EdgeProp’s description), “Condominium/Apartment” (EdgeProp’s category) and “Highrise” with Category: Commercial (IQI) — four labels for one building, and no filed Jenis Bangunan to settle it. All 602 units are one residential product, so there is no unit split to publish. But EdgeProp lists a “shop within the premises” that appears on no other source and is absent from the developer’s own ground-floor schedule. If retail lots exist they would be strata commercial parcels in your building, which is the live buyer question here. And the HDA position itself is undocumented: the approving authority, the land category and the schedule your SPA runs under (Schedule G, Schedule H or a non-HDA contract) are all unpublished, so this page does not assert Schedule H. A serviced apartment on commercial title can still be sold under Schedule H. Ask the developer in writing whether any commercial or retail strata parcel forms part of the development, and whether the kindergarten and the child care centre are parcels sold to an operator or management common property.
What does this page deliberately not publish?
Anything no named source published, and everything Louis’s standing policy excludes. As a matter of policy, certain commercial terms are deliberately withheld and none of them appears on this page, ever — those belong in a conversation where they can be stated accurately for your case, not scraped off a web page months later. Beyond that, the blanks: the developer licence number and the APDL and their validity periods, the approving authority, the building plan approval reference, the land title, PT or lot number and mukim, the restriction in interest, any charge or chargee, the filed building type, the filed tenure and the schedule the SPA runs under, the filed completion and vacant possession dates, liquidated damages terms, the housing development account, the DLP, any filed price range, the service charge and sinking fund, quit rent and assessment, strata title timing, the per-type unit split, the take-up rate, the project-level gross development value, car park bays and ratios, what Levels 1 to 4 contain, the gym’s level and area, lift counts, ceiling heights, the fitting-out level, orientation, site plan, elevations and car-park plan, the contractors and consultants, the kindergarten and child-care operators, security specification, and where the pedestrian link goes. Ask me and I will put every one of them to Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd in writing.

Want the documents rather than the brochure?

I will send you the developer’s own specification and facilities schedules, its distance tables and its floor plans as published, plus Land & General’s media releases naming Residensi Kamelia. And I will put every blank on this page to Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd in writing on your behalf — starting with the developer licence number, the APDL and its validity period, the approving authority, the building plan reference, and the price list and the SPA.

WhatsApp Louis KohCall +6010 906 6685

Louis Koh · Director, LK Group Marketing · IQI Realty Sdn Bhd · Registered Estate Agency. This is marketing information. It is not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer.

Louis Koh

Director, LK Group Marketing · IQI Realty Sdn Bhd · Registered Estate Agency

I work Kuala Lumpur and Selangor new launches, and I publish the filed statutory particulars rather than the brochure copy — including, as here, a project where not one statutory particular has been published by anyone at all, where the developer’s own two websites carry four names for one building, and where my own agency’s page for the project is the contaminated one. If a figure on this page matters to your decision, ask me for the document it came from and I will send it. If a blank on this page matters, I will go and ask the developer in writing.

WhatsApp Louis

Published 8 October 2026 · Last verified 8 October 2026 · Built from the developer’s own project microsite, Land & General Berhad’s media releases of 26 February and 29 May 2026, the group’s corporate milestone register, The Edge, StarProperty, EdgeProp and PropertyGuru, all read on 8 October 2026. No filed KPKT advertisement particulars exist in publicly reachable form for this project, so no licence number, permit number or permit validity period is stated anywhere on this page. This is marketing information. It is not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer.

Kamelia @ Bandar Sri DamansaraResidensi Kamelia · 602 units · 1 block, 26 storeys · 553 sq ft, 2 bed 1 bath · Bandar Sri Damansara, Selangor
WhatsApp

Ask a specific question

If you would rather not use WhatsApp, use this. I answer them myself. Only your name and one contact method are required.

Email or phone — one is enough

What you send is emailed to me and stored on this site. It goes to no third party, joins no mailing list, and fires no tracking. See the privacy policy.

Developer: Land & General (3 developments on this site)

Where it is: Bandar Sri Damansara, Selangor

All developers covered