Bandar Seri Coalfields, Mukim Ijok, Daerah Kuala Selangor (postally 47000 Sungai Buloh) — a 1,001-acre freehold township on ONE licence with FOURTEEN KPKT registrations, TWELVE of them registered under the identical name Bandar Seri Coalfields · exactly ONE is on sale: 11412-14 = Presint 4C1 = The Walden Chapter 2 / Phase 2 — 69 bungalows, 78.50% / 78.01%, VP 7 Mar 2027, permit expires 16 Dec 2026

Eight things about Bandar Seri Coalfields that no other source puts in one place

Each card below is a finding, not a selling point. Three of them are credits to the developer, two are gaps nobody has ever published, and one is a warning about the imagery on this very page.

All fourteen KPKT registrations on licence 11412, one by one — with the code beside every figure

Twelve of these fourteen are registered under the identical name Bandar Seri Coalfields, so this table is the only way to tell which houses you are looking at. The map from marketing name to register code was built record by record, and the single document that does most of the work is the developer’s own statutory panel, which prints an advertising permit number for five projects — and a permit number CONTAINS the register code. The rest closes on unit arithmetic against named published sources. Thirteen of the fourteen are identified; 11412-4 is not, and no name is guessed for it. Every peratusSiap and every date below is quoted from the register, not computed.

No image of this registration is published anywhere — the developer’s own library holds no asset whose title names it.

11412-1 — Precinct 1, the first release

884 units · first sale and purchase agreement 17 Apr 2011 · CCC 2013–2014 · 100.00

Rumah Teres / BerkembarCCC 2013–14register-onlylate components0 of 884 clear RM2m

Six register rows reconcile EXACTLY to StarProperty’s six-precinct table: 138 = The Bromelia · 142 = The Banyan II · 128 = The Banyan · 128 = Areca · 289 = The Duranta 204 + The Oleander 85 · and 59 = a low-cost row NO marketing source lists. 138+142+128+128+289+59 = 884. Four of the six components were certified PAST the 17 Apr 2013 contractual date, the last by about 449 days, with pindaanTempohSerahKosong: Tidak — no extension on the register — and vp: “-”, so the handover dates are unscorable. It also ran about 385 days with NO advertising permit during its selling and building period. iklan: []: nothing filed, so the register is the only statutory source. Register band RM100,000 – RM1,400,000.

No image of this registration is published anywhere — the developer’s own library holds no asset whose title names it.

11412-2 — Senna Homes + Ixora Residences

487 units · first sale and purchase agreement 10 Jan 2014 · CCC 2015, 2017 · 100.00

Rumah Teres261 + 226register-onlyone late component0 of 487 clear RM2m

261 = StarProperty’s “Senna Homes, 261 units, 20×70, 96% sold, completion Q1 2016”, certified 8 Dec 2015 — 33 days INSIDE. 226 = The Edge’s “Ixora … 226 link homes over three phases”, certified 19 Jan 2017 — about 375 days PAST the original date, with NO extension on the register. iklan: []. Register band RM650,000 – RM1,266,720. Keep this phase strictly apart from Senna Heights at Damansara Damai, which is a different licensee, a different district and a high-rise — and from Ixora Garden at Daerah Hulu Selangor, which is a different licensee in a different foreign-buyer zone. Nothing crosses between them on this site: not a figure, not an image, not a link.

No image of this registration is published anywhere — the developer’s own library holds no asset whose title names it.

11412-3 — Hibiscus 2, Rumah Selangorku

224 units · first sale and purchase agreement 2 Apr 2016 · CCC 25 Aug 2017 · 100.00

state-controlled RM205,000handed over Apr 2017~220 days insideregister-only

224 = The Edge AND StarProperty, April 2016: “224 units, two-storey, 18×60, 1,000 sq ft”, and the register’s keluasan 95 mps = 1,022 sq ft built-up corroborates it. The STATE-CONTROLLED price was RM205,000, under the Selangor Rumah Selangorku programme, with the application filed as “Daerah Kuala Selangor, Mukim Ijok, Property Type D” — which is where this page’s mukim comes from. Handed over April 2017. Register band RM180,000 – RM332,000. Permit-continuity note, stated precisely: this record shows about 657 days with no permit, but that gap entirely PRE-DATES its first sale and purchase agreement of 2 Apr 2016, so no unit was sold during it — a different finding from 11412-1’s. One publisher calls this phase Hibiscus 2 and, three years later, Phase 1. There is no Hibiscus 1 in any source. Both numbering systems are printed here and neither is picked.

No image and NO NAME. This is the one registration on the licence that no source identifies, and this page guesses nothing.

11412-4 — UNIDENTIFIED

109 units · first sale and purchase agreement 3 May 2017 · CCC 15 Apr 2019 · 100.00

109 premium 2-storey terraces~2,271 sq ft built-up18 days insideNO marketing name

109 premium two-storey terraces, keluasan 211 mps = about 2,271 sq ft of built-up, certified 15 April 2019 — 18 days INSIDE its 3 May 2019 contractual date, with no extension. No marketing name can be attached to it from the developer, from any portal, from the press or from Wikipedia’s precinct list, and NONE IS GUESSED. iklan: [], so even its tenure and plan reference are register-only. Register band RM852,000 – RM1,458,000. Thirteen of fourteen identified and one not is the honest score, and a client asking which precinct this is should ask the developer in writing.

No image of this registration is published anywhere — the developer’s own library holds no asset whose title names it.

11412-5 — Hibiscus 3, Rumah Selangorku

274 units · first sale and purchase agreement 4 Dec 2017 · CCC 10 Sep 2019 ×2 · 100.00

state-controlled RM220,000handed over Sep 2019~85 days insidean Edge award 2023

159 + 115 = 274 = StarProperty’s “274 two-storey terrace homes, 1,050 sq ft, RM220,000”, and keluasan 98 mps = 1,055 sq ft corroborates it to within five square feet. And the STATE-CONTROLLED RM220,000 equals this record’s register MINIMUM to the ringgit — register band RM220,000 – RM475,340 and RM220,000 – RM384,730. Handed over September 2019, with the Selangor Menteri Besar and the Kuala Selangor District Council president presenting mock keys to ten owners. The Edge Top Property Developers Awards 2023 gave its Affordable Urban Housing Excellence Award to Hibiscus 3 @ Bandar Seri Coalfields — a real, named, phase-level award, and it belongs HERE and not to the phase on sale. Wikipedia’s “two completed Hibiscus phases totalling 498 units” closes exactly: 224 + 274 = 498. iklan: [].

No image of this registration is published anywhere — the developer’s own library holds no asset whose title names it.

11412-6 — Hemingway Residences

252 units · first sale and purchase agreement 8 Nov 2017 · CCC 2018, 2020 · 100.00

158 superlink + 94 semi-Dtwo awardsfour late componentsSTRADDLES RM2m

The cleanest reconciliation on the licence. StarProperty, 2019: “158 units of 24×95 superlink and 94 units of 40×100 semi-detached”. The register’s terrace rows 59+63+36 = 158 and its semi-detached rows 52+28+14 = 94, total 252. Exact. Two components were certified about 406 days INSIDE the date — and four were certified about 179 days PAST it, with pindaanTempohSerahKosong: Tidak and vp: “-”. Both halves, as always. Register band RM1,077,700 – RM2,418,000, which STRADDLES the RM2,000,000 Zone 2 floor: the 14 three-storey semi-detached houses clear outright, the 36 three-storey terraces straddle, the other four rows do not clear — and unit by unit the answer is UNDETERMINABLE, because no per-unit price is filed. It carries this township’s iDEA 2021 Best Completed Landed Development and its Asia Pacific Best Residential Property Malaysia 2019–20, by the unit arithmetic above. iklan: [].

No image of this registration is published anywhere — the developer’s own library holds no asset whose title names it.

11412-7 — Hampton Residences

191 units · first sale and purchase agreement 5 Aug 2019 · CCC 13 Jul 2021 ×4 · 100.00

registered under its own name+6 months NEVER consumed33 acres (press)STRADDLES RM2m

One of only two registrations on the licence registered under its MARKETING name rather than the township name. 191 = StarProperty’s “first phase of 191 premium units … on 33 acres”, which works out at 5.79 units per acre (ours, on a press acreage). A +6-month extension was approved and NEVER CONSUMED: all four certificates landed 23 days inside even the ORIGINAL contractual date. Nobody discloses either the extension or the fact that it was not needed. Register band RM968,000 – RM3,876,000, which STRADDLES RM2,000,000: the 8 two-storey detached and the 19 single-storey detached houses straddle, the 108 terraces and 56 semi-detached houses do not clear, and the answer is UNDETERMINABLE unit by unit. This is also the registration carrying a published “indicatively priced from” figure that sits below its own filed minimum — that figure is withheld, and the kind of figure it is is named in the disclosure below.

The two Walden images on this page are of THIS phase — P4C2, Phase 1 — and they are in the gallery below, captioned as Phase 1. They are NOT images of the phase on sale.

11412-8 — The Walden, precinct P4C2, PHASE 1

47 bungalows · first sale and purchase agreement 23 Apr 2021 · CCC 10 Apr 2023 · vacant possession 17 Jul 2023

P4C2 = PHASE 1+5 months, barely used4 of 47 remaining (undated)STRADDLES by 4.06%

Identified because the developer’s own statutory panel prints permit 11412-8/01-2024/0285(R)-(L) under the heading “THE WALDEN (P4C2) PHASE 1” — and the register code is INSIDE the permit number. Its 47 units and six per-type bands match the register to the sen. CCC came 13 days inside the ORIGINAL date even though a +5-month extension had been approved. The developer’s panel gives per-type balances of 1/0/0/1/1/1 = 4 of 47 remaining, i.e. 91.5% taken up — the only take-up figure anybody publishes for this phase, and it carries NO as-at date, so treat it as a snapshot and not as current. Register band RM1,918,800 – RM3,686,340: five of six type rows clear the RM2,000,000 floor outright and Type B’s minimum misses it by RM81,200, or 4.06%.

No image of this registration is published anywhere — the developer’s own library holds no asset whose title names it.

11412-9 — The Walden, P4C2 Fasa 2

28 bungalows · first sale and purchase agreement 24 Jan 2022 · CCC 21 Jul 2023 · vacant possession 6 Sep 2023

a SECOND filing of Phase 1brochure headed P4C2 (Fasa2)misses RM2m by RM6,260has a Type B

This is the proof that a marketing “phase” can be TWO registrations: its filed brochure is headed P4C2 (Fasa2), so 11412-8 and 11412-9 together are the 75 bungalows the developer sells as The Walden Phase 1. Its 8+7+7+3+3 = 28 units and all ten price figures match the register to the sen. Certified about 187 days and handed over about 140 days inside its date, with no extension. Register band RM1,993,740 – RM2,834,790 — and this is the sharpest foreign-buyer near-miss on the whole licence: Type B’s minimum of RM1,993,740 misses RM2,000,000 by RM6,260, which is 0.313% (ours). Types A and C clear by RM11,590 and RM17,890; seven of seven units in Types A, C, E and F clear and Type B’s seven straddle. Nobody states any of this. And note: this registration DOES carry a Type B, while the phase on sale next door has none. Its filed brochure also prints the SUPERSEDED licence 11412/05-2023/0480(A), which is how the renewal-forward was proved.

No image of this registration is published anywhere — the developer’s own library holds no asset whose title names it.

11412-10 — Jardin Residences, P6A2, Phase 1

110 units · first sale and purchase agreement 19 May 2021 · CCC 24 Jul 2023 · vacant possession 28 Aug 2023

P6A2 = Jardin PHASE 1the ONLY consumed extensionType A 28 + Type B 820 of 110 clear RM2m

Identified from the developer’s own panel, which prints permit 11412-10/03-2024/0656(R)-(L); its 110 units split Type A 28 + Type B 82, matching the register. This is the licence’s ONE genuinely consumed extension: +5 months, with the CCC landing about 66 days PAST the original date and vacant possession about 52 days INSIDE the revised one. One extension consumed out of three approved, and nobody discloses it. Register band RM778,800 – RM1,566,000: 0 of 110 clear the RM2,000,000 floor. And the precinct trap again — P6A2 is Jardin PHASE 1, not Phase 2.

No image of this registration is published anywhere — the developer’s own library holds no asset whose title names it.

11412-11 — Jardin Residences, P6A2 Fasa 2

122 units · first sale and purchase agreement 29 Nov 2021 · CCC 6 Nov 2023 · vacant possession 17 Nov 2023

the second Jardin Ph1 filingTHREE statutory generations in one PDFMDKS and MPKS in one fileregister band SPLICED

Its filed brochure is headed 6A2 (Fasa 2) and shares Jardin Phase 1’s plan reference MDKS 280/4/4/2020-2, so -10 and -11 together are the 232 units sold as Jardin Residences Phase 1. Certified 23 days and handed over 12 days inside its date, with no extension. This single PDF carries THREE generations of statutory block — and it prints MDKS (Majlis DAERAH Kuala Selangor) in its earlier blocks and MPKS (Majlis PERBANDARAN) in its later one. The authority’s own upgrade, visible inside one filed document. Its register band is SPLICED across generations: the minimum RM778,800 matches the earlier filed generation, the maximum RM1,564,750 matches a later one, and the newest generation’s band of RM973,500 – RM1,622,250 matches neither. Only 11412-14’s band is clean to the sen on every surface, which is exactly why this page credits it. 0 of 122 clear RM2,000,000.

11412-12 — Jardin Residences, P6A1, Phase 2

237 units · first sale and purchase agreement 7 Mar 2023 · CCC 27 Jan 2025 · vacant possession 4 Mar 2025

VP THREE DAYS insideP6A1 = Jardin PHASE 2155 of 237 unsold (undated)0 of 237 clear RM2m

Identified from permit 11412-12/01-2025/0065(N)-(L) on the developer’s own panel, and 237 matches EdgeProp’s “237 link houses, Jalan BSC 6A/1, Presint 6” exactly. The sharpest single number on the licence: vacant possession landed THREE DAYS inside its contractual date of 7 March 2025, on 237 units, with no extension. And immediately against it, from the developer’s own panel: “237 Units (Balance Units: 155)” — 155 of 237 unsold, i.e. 34.6% taken up, on a phase certified in January 2025. The panel gives NO as-at date, so this is a snapshot and not a current figure, and it is published with that caveat. Register band RM995,760 – RM1,631,760: 0 of 237 clear RM2,000,000. Its permit lapsed 18 January 2026, eight days before the certificate — correct for a completed scheme.

11412-13 — Quinton Residences, P6B1

128 cluster homes · first sale and purchase agreement 27 Sep 2023 · CCC 31 Jul 2025 · vacant possession 15 Aug 2025

registered Presint 6b1Rumah Kluster, 2 storey58 days insidea 2026 StarProperty EXCELLENCE

The register name is literally Presint 6b1 Bandar Seri Coalfields — the second of only two registrations not registered under the plain township name — and the developer’s panel prints permit 11412-13/06-2025/0707(N)-(L), which contains the code. 128 = Type A 112 + Type B 16, matching the register, and the band matches to the sen. The most recent completion on the licence: certified 58 days and handed over 43 days inside its date, with no extension. Register band RM1,194,960 – RM1,618,560: 0 of 128 clear RM2,000,000. It holds the genuine, named, phase-level StarProperty 2026 EXCELLENCE — The Cornerstone Award for Best Landed Development, Selangor, and the “83% QLASSIC score” slider on the developer’s corporate home page attaches to THIS registration — one surface, no CIDB record found, and a workmanship assessment rather than a design award. Neither belongs to the phase on sale. Its own panel labels the authority “Kuala Selangor Municipal Council” while printing an MDKS District-Council plan prefix in the same panel — both are printed here and neither is resolved.

NO IMAGE OF THIS REGISTRATION EXISTS ANYWHERE. Eleven Walden items sit in the developer’s library and ten of them pre-date this phase’s permit by one to two years: they depict PHASE 1, precinct P4C2. The library’s one precinct-coded render is coded P4C2; the identical filename with P4C1 was tested and DOES NOT EXIST. The four images on the developer’s own Phase 2 page have titles that name nothing whatever, three of them have duplicate twins under identical titles, and one is a screenshot. None is published here. The only correctly-titled Phase 2 assets in existence are two image-only PDFs with no text layer — documents, not images. Ask Louis for them.

11412-14 — Presint 4C1 = The Walden Chapter 2 / Phase 2 — THE PHASE ON SALE

69 freehold bungalows — 30 × 1 storey + 39 × 2 storeys · Lancar · 78.50 / 78.01 · first sale and purchase agreement 7 Mar 2025 · contractual vacant possession 7 Mar 2027

P4C1 = PHASE 2RM2,573,000–5,235,000 · RM2,980,000–4,278,000 filed2,938–4,087 sq ft · 7 type codes, no Type B3.07 units/acrepermit expires 16 Dec 202669 of 69 clear RM2m on PRICE

The only live registration on the licence, and the only one with a current advertising and sales permit: 11412-14/12-2026/1149(N)-(L), 17 Dec 2024 – 16 Dec 2026. Identified four ways: the developer’s panel prints that permit under the heading “THE WALDEN (P4C1) PHASE 2”; the filed brochure AND the filed newspaper advertisement are both headed P4C1; 30 + 39 = 69 on seven surfaces; and all four price figures match the register and the developer’s panel to the sen. Filed as Rumah Sesebuah, Schedule G, tempohAsal 24 Bulan, freehold, Sekatan Kepentingan: Tiada, Bebanan: Tiada, coordinates 3.249874 / 101.486269, plan Bil. (51) dlm. MPKS 200.11/280/4/4/2023-01(A). 69 ÷ 22.47 acres = 3.07 units per acre, the lowest density this site has computed and the one figure that genuinely supports the developer’s “low-density” language (ours, on a press acreage that survives a net-to-gross check). 69 units out of the township’s 3,162 is 2.2%, which also supports the “limited-edition” language, and the arithmetic is worth printing. Three completion dates circulate and 7 March 2027 governs; the filed September 2026 has already passed. No Baki Unit line is filed, so there is no filed take-up check at all.

The phase on sale — ask in writing

Every unit count, CCC date, vacant possession date, peratusSiap figure and price band above is quoted from the KPKT KPKT TEDUH register register, read on 14 October 2026. The register’s own price bands are statutory minima and maxima per component row: they are not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer, and no per-unit price is filed anywhere on this licence. Margins against contractual dates are our own arithmetic on the register’s own sale and purchase agreement and CCC dates. Marketing-name-to-code identifications are proved in each row and the one that cannot be proved is left blank. Six of the fourteen registrations have NO filed advertisement at all (iklan: []), so for 2,230 of the 3,162 licensed units the register is the only statutory source.

What the developer publishes, with the subject of every image stated

Nine images, every one of them the township or a COMPLETED precinct, and every subject taken from the developer’s own content-management title rather than from a filename, a folder, a page placement or a pixel size. That discipline is not decorative here: the developer’s library carries NO alt text on any of its roughly 75 items and prints no caption anywhere on its site, so the title is the entire evidential basis — and three map files in two adjacent folders sit within ONE PIXEL of each other on both axes, one of them titled with a pair of numbers that do not even match its own dimensions. A pick by size, folder or placement hands you the wrong map. The library was also contamination-tested in both directions against this developer’s two OTHER townships — Desa Coalfields on licence 8340 and Caledonia on licence 30020 — with live positive controls, and it passed: not one item carries a title from either. Nothing from those two townships appears on this page. Refused, and the loss is real: the three best renders on the developer’s host name the township in their titles and NO subject at all, so they are not published; six files carry the host’s own misspelling of “haven”; and every launch graphic, logo, thumbnail and stock lifestyle image is excluded. Above all: there is no image of P4C1, the phase on sale, anywhere in the world that this page could verify — so there is none here.

Mukim Ijok, Daerah Kuala Selangor — and why the “Sungai Buloh” in the address is a postcode

Every kilometre figure on this page is the developer’s own, from its own amenities page, with the origin stated as THE TOWNSHIP and the method — straight-line or driving — NOT STATED by the developer. Not one published distance anywhere is measured from P4C1, the phase on sale. Nothing is borrowed from a neighbouring township’s table, in either direction. And the developer’s own table refutes its own address line, which is the single most useful thing on this page for anyone who thinks this is Sungai Buloh town.

11412-14 — registered Bandar Seri Coalfields (presint 4c1), marketed The Walden Chapter 2 / Phase 2: the statutory block as filed

This is the ONE registration of fourteen that is live and on sale, and it has its own register code, its own price band, its own permit and its own delivery date — which is why it gets its own labelled section rather than being folded into the township. Three surfaces are set side by side below: the filed brochure, the filed newspaper advertisement and the developer’s own statutory panel. Where they agree, they agree exactly; where they differ, both are printed. The register was read on 14 October 2026 and the filed documents were read the same day.

Read the row above as the phase on sale only. The other thirteen registrations on this licence have their own codes, bands, permits and dates, and they are set out one by one further up this page. The register’s per-row bands for all fourteen are published there; the state-controlled Rumah Selangorku prices for 11412-3 and 11412-5 are published below. Six of the fourteen registrations have NO filed advertisement at all, so for 2,230 of the 3,162 licensed units the register is the only statutory source — a weaker record, and this page does not level it up.

Marketing information compiled from public records on 14 October 2026. Not an offer, not a quotation and not a price list. The price figures above are the statutory Unit Selling Price minima and maxima from the legally filed advertisement particulars for 11412-14, reproduced to the sen by the KPKT register and by the developer’s own statutory panel, and they are filed per storey rather than per unit — no per-unit price is filed anywhere on this licence. peratusSiap is a quoted register value and no completion date on this page is computed from it. Densities, programme percentages, delivery margins, net-to-gross checks, GDV sums and square-foot conversions marked (ours) are our own arithmetic on named published figures. The 22.47-acre parcel area is a PRESS figure; no filed parcel area exists. Registry fields change without notice. Verify projects 11412-1 to 11412-14, the licence 11412/05-2028/0764(A) and the advertising permit 11412-14/12-2026/1149(N)-(L) on the KPKT register yourself, and verify every figure that matters to you against the price list and the sale and purchase agreement before you commit.

Twelve registrations, one identical name — what that actually means for your own KPKT search

Of the fourteen registrations on licence 11412, TWELVE carry the identical registered name Bandar Seri Coalfields — eleven of them exactly, and 11412-14 as Bandar Seri Coalfields (presint 4c1). Only two are registered differently: 11412-7 as Hampton Residences and 11412-13 as Presint 6b1 Bandar Seri Coalfields. So when a client runs their own search on the KPKT register for the name at the top of this page, twelve records come back. Each is a different product with a different filed price band, a different advertising and sales permit and a different delivery date, and NOTHING on the screen separates them except the register code. That is why this page prints the code beside every figure, and why a page that averaged the fourteen would be worse than useless. Read it both ways, because it genuinely cuts both ways. In your favour: the REGISTERED name IS the township name, which almost never happens on this site — so your own register check on “Bandar Seri Coalfields” resolves and returns real records. Against you: a search for “The Walden”, which is what the sales material calls the houses on sale, returns NOTHING, because that word appears in no filing, no register field and no government document anywhere in Malaysia. And a search on the township name gives you twelve price bands, twelve permits and twelve delivery dates with no way to tell which is yours. Two further traps, and neither is stated by any source. First, a single marketing “phase” can be TWO separate registrations — two permits, two price bands, two delivery dates. 11412-8 (47 bungalows) and 11412-9 (28) are together the 75 houses the developer sells as The Walden Phase 1; 11412-10 (110) and 11412-11 (122) are together the 232 houses it sells as Jardin Residences Phase 1. Second, and this is the one that reverses a reader’s natural assumption: THE PRECINCT CODE RUNS BACKWARDS AGAINST THE PHASE NUMBER on this licence. P4C2 is The Walden PHASE 1 and P4C1 is PHASE 2. P6A2 is Jardin Phase 1 and P6A1 is Jardin Phase 2. On both sequences the LOWER precinct number is the LATER phase. Both facts come out of the filed brochure headings — one is headed P4C2 (Fasa2), another 6A2 (Fasa 2) — read against the developer’s own statutory panel, which prints an advertising permit number for five projects, and a permit number CONTAINS the register code. That is the single most valuable document on this job and it is the developer’s own. The identified map, with the proof in one line each: -1 884 units reconciling exactly to the six precincts a publisher tabulates plus a 59-unit low-cost row no marketing source lists (138+142+128+128+[204+85]+59 = 884) · -2 487 (Senna Homes 261 + Ixora 226) · -3 Hibiscus 2 224, with keluasan 95 mps = 1,022 sq ft against a published 1,000 · -5 Hibiscus 3 274 (159 + 115), with the state’s own price equal to the register minimum to the ringgit · -6 Hemingway Residences 252, where the register’s terrace rows 59+63+36 = 158 superlinks and its semi-detached rows 52+28+14 = 94, matching a published 158 and 94 EXACTLY · -7 Hampton Residences 191, registered under that name · -8 + -9 The Walden P4C2 Phase 1 · -10 + -11 Jardin P6A2 Phase 1 · -12 Jardin P6A1 Phase 2, 237 = a portal’s “237 link houses, Jalan BSC 6A/1” exactly · -13 Quinton Residences 128 = Type A 112 + Type B 16 · -14 The Walden Chapter 2, 69. And 11412-4, 109 units, is UNIDENTIFIED: no marketing name can be attached to it by any source and this page guesses none. Thirteen of fourteen is the honest score.

The developer’s own statutory panel is better than its own filing — on two fields, and it is a credit

Both of 11412-14’s filed statutory documents print the advertising and sales permit number as XXXXXX and its validity as XXXXXX. The developer’s own statutory page prints the real permit — 11412-14/12-2026/1149(N)-(L), valid 17 December 2024 to 16 December 2026 — and the KPKT register agrees with it to the day. So on this project the FILING is the placeholder generation and the DEVELOPER is the complete one, which is the inverse of the usual direction on this site. Lapse is therefore still assessable, from the register plus the developer’s panel. That one page carries five projects’ complete statutory blocks and it is the second-best such page this site has found. What it supplies that the register does not: the licensee’s own company registration number 261277-W, which KPKT prints nowhere; a per-type unit split on three sibling phases; the bridge from five marketing names to five register codes; and the ONLY take-up figures anybody publishes anywhere for this township. Those two take-up figures, with the caveat they need: Jardin Residences (P6A1) Phase 2 at “237 Units (Balance Units: 155)”, i.e. 155 of 237 unsold or 34.6% taken up on a phase certified complete in January 2025; and The Walden (P4C2) Phase 1 at per-type balances of 1/0/0/1/1/1 = 4 of 47 remaining, 91.5% taken up. NEITHER carries an as-at date. A developer panel can copy a filed balance forward as though it were current, so both are published here as an undated snapshot and neither is restated as a present fact. And the panel’s one real fault, which must travel with it: it is dated nowhere, and THREE of its five panels print advertising permits and completion dates that have already expired — Quinton’s permit to 15 June 2025, Walden Phase 1’s to 26 January 2024 and Jardin Phase 1’s to 26 March 2024, with completion dates of July 2025, April 2023 and August 2023. Treat that page as a dated snapshot, never as the live filing. Its -14 panel, which is the one that matters, is correct on licence, permit, plan reference, authority, tenure, encumbrance, restriction, unit count and all four price figures — nothing cross-checkable on it is wrong. That is a credit and this page states it as plainly as it states a fault. One difference that is NOT a fault and must not be read as one: the register prints the licence suffix as (A) while the developer and both filings print (R). This page publishes the register’s suffix and records the difference as an open question. KPKT publishes no key to those letters and nobody should infer one. The same applies to the (N) on the live permit: 11412-12 and 11412-13 each carry TWO history rows with the SAME permit number and the SAME dates, one marked (A)-(L) and one (N)-(L), which is the best evidence yet that those letters are two STATES of one permit rather than two permits — and 11412-14’s own history being EMPTY at 22 months supports reading (N) as FIRST ISSUE. Recorded as a question, never as a defect.

The money that IS publishable — and the state-controlled prices that must never be read as an entry price

Three kinds of figure are published on this page and nothing else is. ONE: the filed statutory Unit Selling Price band of the phase on sale. RM2,573,000.00 – RM5,235,000.00 for the 30 single-storey bungalows and RM2,980,000.00 – RM4,278,000.00 for the 39 double-storey ones. All four figures appear identically, TO THE SEN, on the filed brochure, the filed newspaper advertisement, the register’s own component rows and the developer’s own statutory panel — four surfaces, zero variance. This site has recorded register bands that splice two generations, bands with orphan sen and bands whose register minimum sits below the filed one. This one is clean, and so is every other record the developer’s panel covers: more than twenty figures across five records with no splice at all. That deserves saying as loudly as this site names a splice. They are filed per storey and not per unit, so no individual house’s price is published anywhere. TWO: the register’s own per-row statutory bands for all fourteen registrations, which are set out registration by registration further up this page and which exist for the six records that have no filed advertisement at all. For those six — 2,230 of the licence’s 3,162 units — the register is the only statutory source there is. THREE, and this is the one most readers come for: the two STATE-CONTROLLED Rumah Selangorku prices. Hibiscus 2 = 11412-3: 224 two-storey terraced homes of about 1,000 sq ft at RM205,000, applied for as “Daerah Kuala Selangor, Mukim Ijok, Property Type D”, handed over in April 2017. Hibiscus 3 = 11412-5: 274 homes of about 1,050 sq ft at RM220,000, handed over in September 2019 — and that figure equals 11412-5’s own register MINIMUM to the ringgit. 498 homes in all, which closes exactly on the 498 one encyclopaedia reports. Now the thing that must be said about them, and said clearly. Those are STATE-CONTROLLED STATUTORY PRICES set by the Selangor state affordable-housing programme. They are not developer figures, they were never open to negotiation, and the phases they belong to are FINISHED, HANDED OVER AND SOLD OUT — one in 2017 and one in 2019. They are published here as historic state-controlled prices and as nothing else. They are NOT an entry price for anything on sale today, and anybody who quotes RM205,000 or RM220,000 next to a 2026 bungalow is comparing a state-controlled affordable home from 2017 with an open-market house from a different registration nine years later. No filed advertisement exists for either phase, so there is no filed affordable-price row to quote at all — the register band and the press are the whole record. And on the phase on sale there is NO affordable allocation of any kind: no Harga Mampu Milik (LPHS) row, no affordable type-code pair, no duplicated built-up at two prices and no register affordable flag. Its filed price table has two rows and both are open-market bungalows from RM2,573,000. The state housing board’s own controlled-price list of September 2026 carries NO row for this township at all — and that absence is NOT a negative: that list carries only stock still open for application, and this township’s affordable phases were handed over in 2017 and 2019. (The nearest row it does carry is a different developer’s scheme in the SAME Mukim Ijok and the SAME Daerah Kuala Selangor at the SAME RM220,000 — four coincidences at once. It is refused, and it independently corroborates that Mukim Ijok and Daerah Kuala Selangor are a real pairing.)

The GDV arithmetic, the density denominator, and the eight denominators refused

FOUR township gross development values circulate and they do not move in one direction: RM3.7 billion (The Edge, May 2011, as the initial figure) · RM5.9 billion (The Edge, August 2015) · RM5.6 billion (StarProperty, 2019) · RM5.5 billion (EdgeProp, September 2026). The figure went DOWN after 2015. All four are published here with their dates, and no single one is presented as fact. The arithmetic, which is ours and which passes cleanly in the expected direction: summing the licence’s own statutory minima row by row across all fourteen registrations gives about RM2.534 billion, and summing the maxima gives about RM3.996 billion. 11412-14 alone is RM193,410,000 at the minima and RM323,892,000 at the maxima. So the current RM5.5 billion township claim sits about RM1.5 billion ABOVE the sum of every licensed MAXIMUM — which is the correct direction, and it is fully explained: the licence covers 3,162 DWELLINGS and not one commercial unit, while the township also carries the ~21-acre Coalfields Retail Park, BSC Central’s 101 shop offices and the rest of the commercial, plus the part of the township still in planning. There is no stale-generation signal here at all, which on this site is a credit rather than a neutral. The licensed minima are 46% of the claimed township figure, which for a largely-complete township with a mall is coherent. One figure worth printing beside the GDV, because a buyer is entitled to it: an analyst note of July 2023 puts this whole property division at “less than 5% of KLK’s group profits”, on three-year averages of about RM182 million of revenue and RM59 million of operating profit a year, inside a group with revenue in the tens of billions. That cuts both ways and this page says so: thin management attention on one side, a very deep balance sheet on the other. DENSITY. The phase on sale is 69 units on 22.47 acres = 3.07 UNITS PER ACRE (ours) — the lowest density this site has ever computed, by a factor of three against a previous record of 9.41, and the one figure on this project that genuinely supports the developer’s “low-density” language. Name the denominator honestly: 22.47 acres is a PRESS figure, from one portal’s project table of 15 July 2026, because Keluasan Tanah is NOT PRINTED in either filed document and the register’s keluasan is a built-up. It survives a net-to-gross check against the filing’s own lot sizes: all 69 at the smallest filed lot of 60′×100′ is 9.50 acres, or 42.3% of 22.47; a plausible mix including the 60′×110′ and 60′×170′ lots averages about 10.45 acres, or 46.5%. A 42–47% net-to-gross on a bungalow phase with 60-foot frontages, wide estate roads, a drainage reserve and a central garden is entirely plausible, so the acreage is used — labelled. EIGHT denominators were refused, which is a record for this site, and the refusals matter more than the answer: the township’s own 1,001 acres (it carries the mall, a 50-acre park, three schools, the clubhouse and all the commercial, while the unit count excludes every one of those units) · North Haven’s 516 acres (the enclave that CONTAINS this phase along with five others) · the 50-acre Central Park · the retail park’s ~21 acres and its 7-acre lake park · the 2.5-acre clubhouse-and-gallery parcel · Hampton Residences’ 33 acres, which is a different phase’s own parcel · and the group’s corridor land bank, for which FIVE different figures circulate (5,000 / 5,500 / 6,000 / 6,500 / 6,600 acres from five sources) and every one of which is a land bank rather than a development parcel. Also refused: the mall’s ~1,000,000 sq ft, which is a GROSS BUILT-UP AREA and not land — read the label, not the number. And a township-wide density is NOT offered even though 3,162 ÷ 1,001 acres = 3.16 looks superficially right: the denominator carries the mall, the parks, the schools and all the commercial while the numerator excludes them, so the answer would be right by accident. A plot ratio cannot be computed at all, because no gross floor area is published for any housing phase.

Foreign buyers — the price answer is yes, the title answer is no, and the title governs

The district comes from the filed plan prefix, never from a postcode and never from a township name. Bil. (51) dlm. MPKS 200.11/280/4/4/2023-01(A) → Majlis Perbandaran Kuala Selangor → Daerah Kuala Selangor, corroborated by daerah: Kuala Selangor on all fourteen register records and on both sister licences. Selangor’s published zones: ZONE 1 — Petaling, Klang, Hulu Langat, Sepang — RM2,000,000; ZONE 2 — KUALA SELANGOR and Kuala Langat — RM2,000,000; ZONE 3 — Hulu Selangor — RM1,000,000. So this township sits at RM2,000,000, the SAME floor as Zone 1, and NOT at RM1,000,000. Anybody carrying a RM1,000,000 figure here would halve the real threshold. Sources: a published eligibility checker that prints “Selangor — Zone 2 (Kuala Selangor, Kuala Langat)” verbatim and cites Pekeliling PTG Selangor Bil. 1/2014, and a law-firm note on PTG Selangor Circular 2/2020 of 27 April 2020 tabulating the same three zones. One thing that circular is often quoted for and must NOT be carried as current: its reduction of the threshold to RM1,500,000 ran from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020 only, and it has EXPIRED. Confirm the current figure with Pejabat Tanah dan Galian Selangor before you rely on it; the checker is known to contradict itself across its own pages, which is why two independent sources were used here. ON PRICE, THE ANSWER IS A CLEAN AND WIDE YES — the first time this site has been able to say that about a Selangor landed project. The 30 single-storey bungalows are filed at RM2,573,000 – RM5,235,000: the cheapest clears RM2,000,000 by RM573,000, which is 1.287×, and the dearest by 2.62×. The 39 double-storey bungalows are filed at RM2,980,000 – RM4,278,000: the cheapest clears by RM980,000, which is 1.49×, and the dearest by 2.14×. All 69 of 69 clear. No straddle, nothing undeterminable. (Our arithmetic on the filed bands.) AND IT DOES NOT HELP ANYBODY, BECAUSE THE TITLE BARS THEM ANYWAY. Schedule G plus an advertising and sales permit tail of -(L) plus Rumah Sesebuah plus freehold equals individual-title landed property, and there is no strata reference anywhere on this licence. In Selangor, landed property on an individual title is not permitted to a non-citizen WHATEVER the price — the same eligibility checker states it, citing Pekeliling PTG Selangor Bil. 1/2014, and so does Louis’s own company’s published guide to buying land in Malaysia. The published landed exception turns on strata or landed-strata title, or on a gated and guarded scheme. NO SECURITY SCHEDULE IS FILED in either of the phase’s two filed documents — checked, and present on none of the eight filed brochures on this licence — so that route is unavailable here too. The price answer is yes; the title answer is no; the title governs; and this page will not let “clears the floor by 1.29 times” imply that a non-citizen may buy. The township-wide arithmetic, which nobody publishes, computed per registration against the correct Zone 2 floor: -1 0 of 884 · -2 0 of 487 · -3 0 of 224 · -4 0 of 109 · -5 0 of 274 · -6 STRADDLES (the 14 three-storey semi-detached houses clear outright, the 36 three-storey terraces straddle, four rows do not clear) · -7 STRADDLES · -8 STRADDLES narrowly — five of six type rows clear and Type B’s minimum of RM1,918,800 misses by RM81,200, or 4.06% · -9 STRADDLES BY THE FINEST MARGIN ON THE LICENCE — Type B’s minimum of RM1,993,740 misses RM2,000,000 by RM6,260, which is 0.313%, while Types A and C clear by RM11,590 and RM17,890 · -10 0 of 110 · -11 0 of 122 · -12 0 of 237 · -13 0 of 128 · -14 69 of 69 CLEAR. So on price, 69 of this township’s 3,162 licensed dwellings — 2.2% — clear the Zone 2 floor outright, and all 69 are in the one phase on sale. Three completed registrations straddle it and are UNDETERMINABLE unit by unit, because the bands are filed per component row and no per-unit price exists anywhere. (All of it ours, on the register’s own rows.) And the title bars the lot of them regardless, which is the sentence that has to sit immediately after the arithmetic. One thing this page can state AFFIRMATIVELY, which it rarely can: Sekatan Kepentingan: Tiada / Nil on three surfaces. There is NO filed State-consent restriction here. The strongest single foreign-buyer bar signal this site looks for on a filed advertisement is simply absent, and the bar comes from the title TYPE instead.

Is it gated and guarded? Four sources, four positions, and no filed schedule to settle it

This matters for every buyer, not only a foreign one, and there is no honest single answer — so all four positions are printed and no side is picked. ONE: there is NO FILED SECURITY, GUARDHOUSE OR FENCING SCHEDULE in either of the phase on sale’s two filed documents, and none in any of the other filed brochures on this licence. On this site exactly one project has ever met the gated-and-guarded condition on a filing; it was checked here and it is not met. TWO: the developer’s own strongest published claim is UNIT-LEVEL — “security alarm system and auto-gate system”, from a branded advertorial. That is a house alarm and a driveway gate. It is not a guarded scheme. THREE: the township DOES have its own Auxiliary Police. The developer claims it was “the first development in this part of Klang Valley to invest in forming its own Auxiliary Police” — which is unfalsifiable as written, because “this part of Klang Valley” has no boundary. StarProperty’s version is at least definable — “the first township in the Sungai Buloh West and Shah Alam North vicinity with its own Auxiliary Police” — so that is the form published here, attributed. It is TOWNSHIP-wide, and no document says it polices P4C1. FOUR, and this is a flat contradiction: StarProperty’s own township profile states that the housing areas are NOT gated or guarded — “Housing areas are not gated or guarded. Residents have formed a Facebook group to organise a residents’ association and hire security” — while one portal tags the same township “24-hour security” and “perimeter fencing”, and another publisher calls the phase on sale a “close-knit, gated community” while naming no guardhouse, no guards and no auxiliary police. So: this page does NOT state that the township is gated and guarded, and it does NOT state that it is not. It publishes the contradiction, says there is no filed schedule to settle it, and tells you to get the answer in writing from the developer before you sign anything. It is moot for the foreign-buyer question, because the title bars a non-citizen regardless — but it is a live question for everybody else.

The permits, the licence and the two unpermitted intervals — which are two different findings

ONE live permit, thirteen lapsed, and that is the correct state. 11412-14 carries 11412-14/12-2026/1149(N)-(L), valid 17 December 2024 to 16 DECEMBER 2026 — the only current advertising and sales permit on the whole licence. Thirteen lapsed permits on thirteen COMPLETED schemes is exactly what the register should look like and this page does not report it as a fault. But a page published today is describing a permit that expires within weeks, on houses about 78% built with contractual vacant possession not due until 7 March 2027 — so a renewal or a lapse falls due almost immediately. Ask for it in writing, and treat this section as needing a re-check in December 2026. THE PERMIT CREDIT, and it is the cleanest on this site: the FIRST advertising permit pre-dates the FIRST sale and purchase agreement on FOURTEEN OF FOURTEEN registrations — by 9, 49, 1,079, 27, 108, 76, 31, 86, 361, 53, 187, 47, 103 and 80 days respectively. Selling began under a valid permit every single time, on every phase, for fifteen years. Nobody publishes that either. READ HONESTLY AGAINST IT: twelve of the fourteen have continuous permit cover and TWO do not — and the two are not the same finding. 11412-1 ran from 8 April 2013 to 27 April 2014, about 385 days, with NO advertising permit, DURING its selling and building period (its first sale and purchase agreement was 17 April 2011). That is the finding that matters, because it means houses were being advertised and sold on a scheme whose permit was not current. 11412-3 shows a longer gap, from 19 April 2014 to 5 February 2016, about 657 days — but that gap ENTIRELY PRE-DATES its first sale and purchase agreement of 2 April 2016, so no unit was sold during it. An unpermitted interval BEFORE the first sale is not the same thing as one DURING the selling period, and this page says which is which rather than reporting two gaps and letting a reader assume the worse of both. The licence itself: 11412/05-2028/0764(A), 26 May 2023 to 25 May 2028, identical on six surfaces and CURRENT. The superseded generation, 11412/05-2023/0480(A) running to 25 May 2023, is printed inside two of this licence’s filed brochures — so the new licence begins THE DAY AFTER the old one ended. RENEWED FORWARD, not lapsed, and the expiry reconstructs from the licence’s own /05-2028/ segment, which is what all six surfaces print. Five of this licence’s permits carry a (P) suffix and NO -(L) or -(S) tail (-1, -2, -3, -4, -6, running from 2014 to 2020), so the free landed-versus-strata read from a permit tail is simply unavailable on those five, whatever their date. Nothing is inferred from a letter whose key KPKT does not publish.

Not published, therefore not on this page — the full list, with the reason for each

Every item below is something a buyer would reasonably ask and no source answers. The reasons differ, and the difference is the point. How many of 11412-14’s 69 houses are Type A, C, D, D1, E, F or G — NOT PRINTED in the filing, absent from the register, absent from the developer’s panel and absent from every portal. Only the 30 single-storey / 39 double-storey split exists. Which type carries the RM5,235,000 maximum, and why the dearest house in the phase is a SINGLE-STOREY one — the filing gives a single-storey maximum of RM5,235,000 against a single-storey built-up ceiling of 3,928 sq ft and a two-storey maximum of RM4,278,000 against a ceiling of 4,087 sq ft, and it does not say which type or why. The 60′×170′ lot is the obvious candidate and no document confirms it, so this page does not state it. Whether there is a Type B in this phase — the codes run A, C, D, D1, E, F, G, and the sibling registration 11412-9 DOES carry a Type B. The gap is printed, not reconciled. The car-park bay count — Tempat Letak Kereta is NOT PRINTED in either filed document; the plans show Anjung Kereta (a porch) and Laluan Kereta (a driveway), and a porch is not a filed bay count. The lot number, the PT number and the street address of P4C1 — no filed document gives one, the filing locates the phase by precinct code and the register by coordinates, and there is no Bursa land or contract announcement to recover a lot number from. The contractor, the architect and every consultant, and any commencement date — published nowhere, by anybody, for any phase of this township: no stock-exchange announcement, no construction record, no consultant list in either filed document. Not even an architect, so the usual architect-published-contractor-not inversion does not apply here: NEITHER is published. And with no commencement date the contractor float test cannot be run in either direction. The title type as a FILED fact — freehold is filed eight ways, but individual-versus-strata is never filed. The “individual freehold land titles” statement belongs to a publisher and to a DIFFERENT phase of this township. Whether P4C1 is gated and guarded, and by whom — four sources, four positions, no filed schedule. Whether a P4C1 buyer gets clubhouse access, on what terms and at what cost — a “Clubhouse Membership Enquiries” phone number is the only answer anybody publishes. Any distance from P4C1 to anything at all — the clubhouse, the 50-acre park, the mall, the three schools, a station, a highway entrance. Every published kilometre figure is measured from the township. Whether the advertising permit will be renewed past 16 December 2026. How many of the 69 remain unsold — no Baki Unit line is filed for this registration and no source gives one, so there is no take-up figure for the phase on sale at all. What became of the purchasers in 11412-1, 11412-2 and 11412-6 whose components were certified AFTER the original contractual date with no extension on the register — their late-delivery entitlement, and whether any claim was made or paid. Answered by no public document, and this page says so outright rather than quietly omitting it. Which marketing name belongs to 11412-4, the 109-unit registration no source identifies. No name is guessed. Any GDV for 11412-14 — not published; the sums on this page are ours. A plot ratio for any phase — no gross floor area is published for any housing component. The Housing Development Act position of BSC Central’s 101 shop offices — no registration, no permit, and no document states it either way, which is why this page states the structural position (the licence covers dwellings only) rather than making a claim about those units. The registration numbers of KLK Land Sdn Bhd, KLK Retail Centre Sdn Bhd and KLK Park Homes Sdn Bhd, and the shareholding of the licensee — only the licensee’s own 261277-W is obtainable, and only from the developer’s own documents; the parent’s annual-report server did not respond. Whether the 2026 “Walden Residences” Honours belongs to Phase 1 or Phase 2 — the citation names no phase and this page records it as UNRESOLVED. Any CIDB record behind the “83% QLASSIC” slider. And three statements by others that this page carries only as attributed statements, because no record can test them: the developer’s “about 70% complete”, which cannot be a unit measure because 3,093 of 3,162 licensed dwellings are certified — so it must be a land or GDV measure and no source says which; the advertorial’s “2,750 houses completed and handed over”, which sits 343 units BELOW the register’s 3,093 certified dwellings with nobody explaining the difference; and “about 10,300 residents” and “a population of over 1 million within a 20-minute drive”, which are developer and press figures with no published basis. Carried attributed, or not carried at all. One more, for completeness and because a reader would otherwise believe it: The Edge wrote in 2015 that “the whole development is due for completion by 2025”. That date has been MISSED.

What this page does not publish, and why

Louis’s rule on this site is absolute, and it is worth stating before the list rather than after it: no page here publishes a discount, a rebate, a nett price, a promotion or incentive value, an agency commission, a Bumiputera allocation value, a guaranteed-rental rate or a yield projection. Those belong in a conversation with the documents in front of you, not on a web page. This paragraph is the only place any of those words appears anywhere on this page, in either language. SIX separate families of withheld figure exist on this project, and the page names which KIND each one is — because withholding without saying what was withheld reads like concealing a defect, and on this project most of what is withheld is not a defect at all. KIND ONE: the ethnic-allocation price-adjustment field. It EXISTS — on all five of the developer’s statutory panels AND inside BOTH filed documents for 11412-14. Its existence is published here. Its value is not published, is not recorded in this site’s working files at all, and is withheld in full. KIND TWO, and it is a new kind that this page has to explain rather than simply refuse: SIX launch-era “from” prices from 2011 and 2015, for the six first-release precincts, five of which sit BELOW the current register minimum of the row they match. Those figures are withheld under Louis’s rule — but the REASON matters, because the gap is not evidence of anything. The register band is the CURRENT generation of a scheme launched in 2011 and re-filed upward over fifteen years, so a 2011 launch price sitting below a 2026 register minimum is the NORMAL, EXPECTED direction on a long-running township. The below-minimum test, which is a real test on a new launch, produces a FALSE POSITIVE here. It is a mechanical rule meeting a fifteen-year-old township, not a concealed defect, and saying so is part of withholding it honestly. KIND THREE: a pre-launch indicative figure for Hampton Residences (11412-7), published in 2019 while that phase was “open for registration”, which sits below its own filed minimum of RM968,000. Withheld. One publisher, and a pre-launch estimate rather than a price. KIND FOUR: one publisher’s indicative “prices from” figure for the phase on sale, which sits BELOW its filed statutory minimum of RM2,573,000. The figure is withheld and appears nowhere in this site’s working files. Three things must be said about it. It is carried by exactly ONE publisher, because that publisher and its sister titles count as one house on this site, and a one-publisher discrepancy is a weaker finding than a multi-publisher one. The SAME publisher’s own advertorial on the same project prints NO price at all, which is to its credit. And the DEVELOPER’S own statutory panel and both of its filed documents print the correct RM2,573,000 — so here the developer is right and its own publisher is wrong, which is the inverse of the usual case on this site. KIND FIVE: resale asking prices and per-square-foot series on the completed phases — one portal’s sub-sale asking figures for the township and for Quinton Residences, and another publisher’s 48-month transacted per-square-foot series on two township records. All withheld. And again the kind matters: these are resale asking and transacted floors on a township whose first phases were handed over in 2013 and 2014. A resale floor below a long-ago filed minimum on a twelve-year-old scheme is UNREMARKABLE. Two of those series are worth one further caveat: both of one publisher’s township records carry the IDENTICAL historical per-square-foot high and low, which means a township-wide transaction series has been pasted onto a 47-unit bungalow phase. Neither figure is published. KIND SIX: BSC Central 1’s shop-office figure from 2015. Withheld, and it is NOT TESTABLE AT ALL — because that component holds no developer licence, has no advertising permit and therefore has no statutory floor for a figure to sit below. There is nothing to measure it against. What IS published, and nothing else: the filed statutory Unit Selling Price bands of 11412-14; the KPKT register’s own per-row statutory bands for all fourteen registrations; and the two STATE-CONTROLLED Rumah Selangorku prices for 11412-3 and 11412-5, labelled as historic state-controlled statutory prices for completed, handed-over, sold-out phases and never as an entry price for anything. Every one of those is a filed or registry figure, every one carries its label, and every one carries the same house disclaimer: it is not a price list, it is not a quotation and it is not an offer. For anything beyond them — and that includes every question about what you would actually pay — ask Louis, with the price list and the statutory sale and purchase agreement in front of you.

Bandar Seri Coalfields — the questions, answered from the register and the filings

Also worth seeing

Published 14 October 2026 · last verified 14 October 2026 against the KPKT KPKT TEDUH register project records 11412-1 to 11412-14 on a full serial walk (11412-15 returns CLIENT_ERROR and bilanganProjek: 14 agrees), the licensee record for developer code 11412, the sister licences 8340 and 30020 walked record by record so that nothing from either township could be mistaken for this one, both filed statutory documents for 11412-14 on the KPKT HIMS file server with a negative control run so that “cannot be read” and “not filed” stay distinguishable, the developer’s own five-project statutory panel and its project, precinct, amenities, clubhouse, accolades, portfolio and press pages each read separately, the GreenRE Platinum, Gold, Silver and Bronze registers plus the Bronze and Silver certification-entry lists, the GBI directory — which returns a 404 and is therefore inconclusive — the Selangor state housing board’s controlled-price list of September 2026, and two independent sources for the Selangor foreign-buyer zones. Marketing information, not an offer.