COLONIAL INFINITE @ edumetro, Persiaran Subang Permai, USJ 1 / Taman Subang Permai, 47500 Subang Jaya, Daerah Petaling, SELANGOR — commercial-titled DUPLEX / SIMPLEX OFFICE SUITES, sold OUTSIDE the Housing Development Act: NO KPKT developer licence, NO registered scheme, NO advertising and sales permit, NO filed advertisement — and therefore no Schedule H, no HDA late-delivery compensation, no housing development account, no statutory defect liability period and no Tribunal for Homebuyer Claims

Nine findings about Colonial Infinite that no other page puts in one place

Each card is a finding, not a selling point. Two are genuine credits to the developer, five are absences nobody else prints, one is about the developer’s own sales page, and one is a decoy that a client searching the register will hit first.

The two products, and why there is no size on this page

The developer markets exactly two sub-types, Duplex and Simplex office suites, under its own page headings. No source anywhere publishes a built-up area, a storey count, a type code, a bedroom or bathroom count, a car-park allocation or the duplex-versus-simplex split of the 261 units. There is no filed type schedule to fall back on, because there is no filing — which is the one thing even the thinnest licensed sheet in this series has.

Duplex office suite

Built-up: NOT PUBLISHED by anybody · type code: none exists · level: not published

Developer’s own headingCommercial titleOutside the HDANo size published

This is the developer’s own layout sheet for the duplex, and it is the only layout document that exists for this phase — its CMS title, Colonial Infinite – Duplex Unit Layout NEW_Website, is the one asset on the whole host whose title names both the project and the subject. It carries no legible dimension that could be transcribed, and no source publishes a built-up for it. So this page states no size — and it does not borrow one from The New Duo (844–928 sq ft), Lakeview Suites (474–581 sq ft), Colonial+ (227–377 sq ft), PropertyGuru’s edumetro record (668–993 sq ft) or EdgeProp’s transaction table (771–928 sq ft). Every one of those belongs to a different phase. And it does not read keluasan: 60 mps off register record 1890-9 as a size either: that is a BUILT-UP in square metres, on a different and completed scheme.

Ask for the built-up in writing

NO PUBLISHED LAYOUT FOR THE SIMPLEX. The developer publishes one layout sheet and it is the duplex. This page would rather carry no image than caption a guess — and on this host that discipline matters, because the lower half of the developer’s own Colonial Infinite page carries a sibling phase’s floor plans.

Simplex office suite

Built-up: NOT PUBLISHED · no layout sheet exists for this sub-type · level: not published

Developer’s own headingNo plan publishedNo size published

The simplex is named only in a page heading. There is no plan, no built-up, no type code and no unit count for it. StarProperty, 28 May 2026, says “the units typically feature a one-room and one-toilet layout” — and its own sentence does not say which sub-type, which tower or which entity it describes. That is the most specific layout statement any publisher makes about this phase. A separate floor plan does exist in the developer’s media library and is refused here: its CMS title is 20250207_edumetro Website, which names no subject and no phase, and an unattributable floor plan is worse than none.

NOTHING TO ILLUSTRATE. This is a list of absences, and a render would misrepresent it.

What a buyer should ask for, since none of it is published

The seventeen questions no source answers

Ask in writingBefore paying anything

Ask the developer, in writing, and keep the answer: what title will I get and for how long; what sale and purchase agreement will I sign and what happens if it is late; is my money in a ring-fenced account; what is my defect liability period; where do I complain if it is not delivered; how big is the unit; how many floors and which floor am I on; how many car-park bays come with it; when exactly will this phase be finished; who is building it; what will maintenance cost; will a bank lend on a commercial-titled suite; what is the registered charge on the land; what is the duplex-versus-simplex split of the 261; how many of the 1,673 units are occupied; does the GreenRE Bronze certification cover these towers; and what does the developer say about the abandoned site across the road. Every one of those is unanswered by every public source reached on this project.

Send Louis this list for the developer

No built-up, no storey count, no type code and no price appears above, because none is published for Colonial Infinite by any source. This page does not estimate, interpolate or borrow one from a sibling phase, a portal record or a register row belonging to a different scheme.

Gallery — ten images, every caption built from the developer’s own CMS file title

Every caption above is built from the developer’s own CMS file title, never from the heading printed above the image on its own page — because that page’s gallery captions are shifted ONE SLIDE OUT OF STEP. Alt text is empty on every one of these files, so the CMS title is the whole evidential basis for the subject. Nine of the ten are Colonial Infinite’s own assets, uploaded between February and September 2025, and the tenth depicts edumetro and is captioned as edumetro. Refused and not shown: every campaign and pop-up artwork, a flyer whose own CMS title is an AI-tool export name, a floor plan whose CMS title names no subject and no phase, two subject-free group-site photographs, every image belonging to Lakeview Suites, The New Duo and Colonial+, and the three progress-photo thumbnails — one filename of which is reused across five differently dated progress updates, so the thumbnails do not correspond to their own dates. Every image here is an artist’s impression except the location map, and every render says so.

Persiaran Subang Permai, USJ 1, Subang Jaya — and exactly one published distance

The site is in Taman Subang Permai, on Persiaran Subang Permai, which both SEGi’s own campus footer and PropertyGuru place inside USJ 1. The local authority is Majlis Bandaraya Subang Jaya and the district is Daerah Petaling — and both were settled by the WEAK route, which this page names rather than hides.

Registered scheme: NONE EXISTS — the statutory particulars block, label by label

On every other project page on this site, this table is the spine: the registered scheme name, the licensed developer and its company number, the licence identifier and its validity, the advertising and sales permit and its expiry, the filed unit and storey counts, the filed tenure, the statutory selling-price band and the built percentage. Here every cell is an absence, and the absences are GRADED, because “not filed”, “cannot be read” and “not published” are three different statements and only one of them applies to most of these rows.

Every cell above was established on 14 October 2026 by reading the registers, not by inference. Sources and routes: TEDUH developer-swasta with fourteen search strings plus a same-session positive control returning 16 licensees; a full serial walk of the landowner’s licence 1890-1 through 1890-10; both HIMS filed-document path forms, with a negative control; the developer’s own microsite (24 pages, plus its open WordPress API); the group’s corporate site (29 pages and 75 posts via its sitemaps); all four GreenRE tiers plus the Bronze certification-entry list; GBI; four Star group articles; five Focus Malaysia pieces under one byline; four Edge group articles; Malay Mail; three PropertyGuru records; SEGi College’s own campus page; and the state housing board’s portal search. Not a price list, not a quotation, not an offer.

Three distinctions this table keeps, because collapsing them would be dishonest. NOT FILED means no filing exists for a value to sit in — that covers every statutory row above. CANNOT BE READ would mean a filing exists but the value is unobtainable from it; nothing on this project falls in that category, and this page says so rather than letting the stronger phrase do the weaker one’s work. NOT PUBLISHED means the value would exist even without a filing and no source prints it — the built-up, the storey count, the car park, the lease expiry, the chargee and this phase’s own completion date. And UNREADABLE means the register field itself lives only on a project record that does not exist — which is NOT the same as the field reading clean.

How the absence was established, and why it is the strongest form of absence in this series

The route matters, because “we could not find it” and “it does not exist” are not the same claim. Fourteen TEDUH developer-swasta search strings were run in one session against a positive control, q=EXSIM, which returned 16 licensees — so the tool was working. q=HCK PROPERTIES returned 0. q=HCK returned 3, and HCK Properties Sdn. Bhd. was not among them. q=COLONIAL, q=EDUMETRO, q=REMIX, q=RENAISSANCE, q=TRUE RENAISSANCE and q=GREENDEV each returned 0. q=INFINITE returned 1 — a licensee in Kuala Lumpur with nothing to do with this project. q=MUARA, q=BINAJAYA, q=EMPIRE, q=SUBANG and q=SEGI returned no relevant licensee either. Because there is no licence, there is no licence serial; because there is no serial, there is no projek-swasta/<serial>-<n> record to read; and because there is no record, there is no iklan array to read a filed advertisement’s filename out of. Both HIMS filed-document path forms were attempted and neither is constructible. A negative control was run so that “not filed” stays distinguishable from “cannot be read”: the one candidate path that could be built, under the landowner’s licence, returns CLIENT_ERROR — so a 404 looks different on that host from a readable file. And the developer’s own two websites were read in full for a statutory panel: the microsite’s whole 24-page sitemap and the group site’s 29 pages and 75 posts. There is no /apdl page, no disclaimer page, no terms page and no statutory panel of any kind on either host. One sibling phase’s e-brochure PDF was opened and it carries no statutory block at all — no licence number, no permit number, no approving authority, no building plan number, no tenure, no completion date, no unit count and no selling price; its disclaimer names only “Developer HCK”, with no company name and no registration number. Finally, the fallback routes this site uses when a developer files nothing: EdgeProp has no project record for Colonial Infinite in any of its four record forms, only a rental listing for edumetro; PropertyGuru’s edumetro record carries no licence number and no permit number; and a web search for the project name together with “Developer License”, “Advertising Permit”, “APDL” and “No. Lesen” returned nothing relevant. So this is the weakest of the four absence states this site has catalogued: not a filed advertisement with no readable text layer, and not an existing record with an empty iklan array — there is no record for a filing to be attached to at all. This page states that requirement and makes NO allegation about any party’s conduct. An advertising and sales permit must be in force before units in a housing development may be advertised or sold; the register shows none for this project; so a buyer should ask to see the permit number, the developer licence number and the registered scheme name — in writing — before paying anything or signing anything.

Run the search yourself, and know what the result means

A client’s own KPKT search for “Colonial Infinite”, “edumetro” or “HCK Properties” returns NOTHING, and that is the CORRECT result, not a search error. Go to the KPKT TEDUH register, search the licensed-developer list for the exact company name printed in the copyright line of the developer’s own website, HCK Properties Sdn. Bhd., and you will get an empty result. Then search “HCK” and you will get three companies — HCK BESTARI SDN. BHD., HCK BROGA SDN. BHD. and HCK ESTATES SDN. BHD. — none of which is the company on the edumetro website, and none of which has a registered scheme at edumetro. HCK Bestari has exactly one registered project and it is e.Sentral SmartCity, a different development in a different district with its own page on this site. HCK Broga and HCK Estates are live licences with ZERO registered projects between them — so neither has a registered scheme, an advertising permit, a filed building type, a filed contract schedule, a filed price or a binding completion date. What you will NOT find, because it does not exist: a register code to print beside the name, a filed selling-price band, a filed vacant-possession date, a built percentage, an extension-of-time field, or a developer-conduct record for the company selling this product. Four different company names are credited as “the developer” of edumetro on different surfaces — HCK Properties Sdn Bhd on the microsite, in GreenRE, on PropertyGuru and on StarProperty’s developer page; HCK Builders Sdn Bhd as the joint-venture signatory in The Edge and Malay Mail; HCK Capital Group Bhd in the Star group’s and Focus Malaysia’s articles and in the award post; and HCK Capital Group / HCK Group used interchangeably on both of the group’s own websites. With no register entry there is nothing to arbitrate between them, so the licensed-entity question is simply unanswerable — and the GreenRE row is the only public register anywhere that names any of them.

The landowner’s licence, walked in full — and kept firmly separate from this project

The Edge, 16 January 2019, names the edumetro landowners as Projek Muara Sdn Bhd and its unit Dergahayu Sdn Bhd. DERGAHAYU SDN. BHD. does hold a developer licence: code 1890, licence 1890/04-2030/0242(R), valid 21 April 2025 to 20 April 2030, jumlahProjek: 9, statusPemaju: Aktif, mempunyaiKesalahan: null, registered at Wisma Dergahayu, Level 5, 26 Jln. Indah 23, Taman Cheras Indah, 56100 Kuala Lumpur, with no email and no website in the register. All ten serials were tried: 1890-1 through 1890-9 resolve, 1890-10 returns a 404, and the walk agrees with the count of nine. No dormant twin, no cancelled record, no unlisted phase — and decisively, NO 2025-era registration of any kind. Colonial Infinite launched in February 2025, so it cannot be any of the nine. One of the nine deserves its own paragraph, because anybody who finds it will mistake it for this project. 1890-9 is registered “Usj 1, Subang”: 447 units of Pangsapuri Servis, 29 storeys, daerah: Petaling, contract type Jadual H, tempohAsal 36 Bulan, first sale and purchase agreement 25 November 2015, contractual vacant possession 25 November 2018, pindaanTempohSerahKosong: Tidak — no extension of time was ever approved — CCC 3 January 2019, 100.00% built, status: Siap Dengan CCC, and a filed band of RM431,000 to RM895,000. Read its permit history both ways, as this site always does. The credit: permit 1, 1890-9/09-2017/0753(P), ran from 3 September 2015 — 83 days BEFORE the first sale and purchase agreement — so selling began under a valid permit. The fault: there was a 39-day UNPERMITTED INTERVAL DURING THE SELLING PERIOD, from 3 September 2017 to 11 October 2017, two years after the first agreement was signed — and that is a different and more serious category than an unpermitted gap before any unit was sold, which is why this page names which one it is. The renewal then ran continuously to expiry. All three permits carry the (P) suffix and the last runs into 2019 — the seventh time in this series that (P) has been confirmed not to be a pre-2017 marker. WHAT 1890-9 ACTUALLY IS: NOT ESTABLISHED. The best available reading is U Reka, Jalan USJ 1/1C, because PropertyGuru names Dergahayu Sdn Bhd in that record’s developer field and “Greendev Sdn Bhd, part of Dergahayu Group” in its body — but PropertyGuru gives U Reka 1,134 units, 32 storeys, every unit 180 sq ft, freehold in one field and leasehold in another, and completion 2018 in one field and 2024 in another, against the register’s 447 units and 29 storeys. Nothing reconciles and no source closes it. What IS certain: 1890-9 is 100% built and CCC’d, Colonial Infinite is a 2025 launch, they are not the same thing, and this page does not borrow 1890-9’s price band, its Jadual H contract, its Pangsapuri Servis building type or any of its statutory protections. Two more things about that record are not used here: its filed coordinates, 3.023500, 101.360700, are about 26 km west of USJ 1 and are therefore defective; and its keluasan: 60 mps is a BUILT-UP in square metres, not a land area, which read as a land area would understate a 29-storey parcel by orders of magnitude. And from the same searches, three further register facts: Greendev Sdn Bhd — the second developer appointed on Empire Remix 1, wound up 18 July 2023 — holds no developer licence; True Renaissance Development Sdn Bhd, the original developer of both Remixes and wound up 15 May 2024, holds none either; and so do Projek Muara Sdn Bhd, Binary Binajaya Sdn Bhd and HCK Builders Sdn Bhd. Three of the four companies that have ever developed on this site hold no housing-developer licence at all, and the fourth has no registration for it.

Price — four families of figure, each labelled by kind, and none of them is this project’s price

FAMILY ONE: the statutory Unit Selling Price band DOES NOT EXIST. Harga Jualan Unit (Minima–Maksima) is the one class of price this site publishes as a matter of course, because it is the filed SPA range and a matter of public record. There is no filed advertisement here and no register row, so there is no band to publish and nothing is being withheld. The absence of the band IS the finding, not a gap in the research. And two of this site’s standard price tests are therefore INAPPLICABLE rather than failed: the below-filed-minimum test cannot be run because there is no minimum to be below, and the GDV test cannot be run because there are no filed minima to sum. FAMILY TWO: one publisher’s indicative per-square-foot figure. StarProperty, 28 May 2026, gives an indicative figure for this phase. It is recorded in this site’s working file and it is NOT published here — and the reason is ACCURACY, not a compliance bar. That distinction matters, because an unexplained omission reads as concealment. It is a per-square-foot rate and not a unit price; the built-up it would have to be multiplied by is not published by anybody; and it is not a sale and purchase agreement price, which is the only kind of price this agency quotes. FAMILY THREE: a public transaction record, publishable only as exactly what it is. EdgeProp, 6 October 2025, records transactions in edumetro’s COMPLETED, EARLIER phases between October 2022 and March 2025: RM672,000 to RM742,000 over 771 to 928 sq ft, at RM784.52 to RM922.27 per sq ft. That is the resale market for buildings that already exist. It is NOT Colonial Infinite’s price, it is not an entry price for anything, and its built-ups belong to those earlier phases and not to this one. Note also that the band’s endpoints do not pair — RM672,000 over 928 sq ft would be about RM724 per sq ft, below the quoted floor — so the per-square-foot figures are per-transaction and are quoted exactly as published, with nothing recomputed. FAMILY FOUR: a named valuer’s locality frame. Eddy Wong, managing director of Nawawi Tie Leung Real Estate Consultants, told EdgeProp on 6 October 2025 that comparable COMPLETED units in USJ 1 now sell at RM850 to RM950 per sq ft. That is a market frame for the locality, with the valuer and the publisher named, and it is not this project’s price either. One cross-check is worth recording and not publishing: the indicative figure in family two sits inside both the transacted range and the valuer’s range, which makes it plausible — and plausible is not the same as publishable. And on GDV: five different figures circulate for overlapping scopes — about RM688.74 million for edumetro, “about RM850 million” for edumetro after rebranding, “about RM1 billion” for both Remixes together, RM285 million plus RM95 million for the 2012 tower purchases, and RM2.3 billion for Empire Remix 1 at its own 2012 launch, which belongs to a different development entirely. No GDV is published for Colonial Infinite alone, and none of the five may be divided or apportioned to it. For the actual number: the price list and the sale and purchase agreement at the sales gallery are where a real price comes from, and Louis will get the current SPA price (合同价) in writing.

Foreign buyers — the answer has three parts and all three belong on the page

The district is Daerah PETALING, which is Selangor Zone 1, where the foreign-buyer floor is RM2,000,000 — the same as Zone 2, and not the RM1,000,000 that applies in Zone 3 (Hulu Selangor and Sabak Bernam). PART ONE: that threshold governs the foreign acquisition of RESIDENTIAL property, and on the evidence this is not residential property. The Selangor zone floors are set by state land-office circulars that address residential units; a commercial-titled office suite is a different acquisition category with its own consent requirements. So RM2,000,000 is stated here as the residential Zone 1 figure and it is NOT applied to this product. PART TWO: the price test cannot be run in any case. There is no filed statutory band and therefore no per-unit price to test against any threshold, and one publisher’s per-square-foot rate on an unpublished built-up yields no unit price at all. PART THREE: the title test does not reach it either. The individual-versus-strata and Sekatan Kepentingan analysis this site runs on housing does not apply to a commercial title — and the restriction itself cannot be read, because nothing is filed and no title search has been done. THEREFORE: UNDETERMINABLE. This page does not write “foreigners can buy” and does not write “foreigners cannot buy”. Neither is supported. A non-citizen buyer must confirm the position with the Pejabat Tanah dan Galian Selangor and with their own solicitor, on the actual registered title. And there is no second bar to clear: there is no affordable-housing allocation of any kind here, no Rumah Selangorku flag, no state-controlled price row, and none can exist on a commercial title.

What this page does not publish, and why

This agency has one absolute compliance instruction and this page applies it literally. No discount figure, no rebate figure, no nett price, no promotion information, no incentive-package detail and no commission information appears anywhere on this page, from any source, whatever its provenance — and those six terms appear exactly once each on this page, here in this sentence, and nowhere else. A seventh term is named here for completeness and also appears exactly once, here: Bumiputera. And on this project the honest statement about it is not the usual one: no ethnic-allocation field exists anywhere — not in a filed advertisement, because there is none; not in a register row, because there is none; and not on any marketing surface either. So nothing is being withheld under that head, because there is nothing there to withhold — which is a different statement from withholding a value, which is what this page says on projects where the field exists. Now the harder half, stated once and plainly. This development has carried an unusually heavy trail of buyer-inducement schemes on the developer’s own surfaces and in the Star group’s pages: interest-bearing-deferment schemes of the DIBS kind, a “value guarantee”, an extra-financing programme of interest-free instalments on the down payment, a “pay nothing until full possession” arrangement, festive and lucky-draw campaigns, and seasonal web pop-ups. The EXISTENCE of those schemes is recorded in that one sentence because a buyer is entitled to know they exist. EVERY VALUE, EVERY RATE, EVERY PERCENTAGE, EVERY CAP AND EVERY TERM STAYS OUT — none was written down in the working file, none was sought, and the two scheme-specific brochures found in the developer’s media library were deliberately not opened. Nor does this page reproduce any rental-return or capital-growth claim. One publisher asserts “strong rental yield and capital growth” and the group’s managing director is quoted on “strong rental potential”; neither gives a figure, no yield or return projection is recorded anywhere in this site’s working file, and the claim is not reproduced here as a fact. Every campaign and pop-up image in the developer’s library was also refused for the gallery for the same reason. And the one price this agency will give you, on request and in writing, is the sale and purchase agreement price (合同价) — so that anything beyond it is a conversation with Louis and not a number on a web page.

Not published, therefore not on this page

The short, blunt list. No built-up area for any Colonial Infinite unit type, from anybody. No storey count for this phase. No unit mix by type and no duplex-versus-simplex split of the 261. No car-park allocation per unit. No lease expiry date. No mukim, no land section — there is none, because USJ numbers are neighbourhoods — and no lot or PT number. No land area for this phase’s own parcel, and probably no separate parcel to have one. No GDV for this phase. No contractor, no architect, no consultant and no commencement date for this phase. No completion date for this phase. No service charge rate and no sinking fund rate. No chargee. No coordinate. No occupancy figure for the 1,673 units. No facilities schedule, no levelled facilities plan and no filed facilities list — and there cannot be a filed one. No distance to any rail station, any highway interchange, any mall, any hospital or any school other than SEGi College, which is inside the same podium. And on the register side: no registered scheme name, no licence number, no advertising and sales permit, no permit validity, no building plan approval reference, no filed building type, no filed tenure, no restriction in interest, no filed unit count, no statutory price band, no built percentage, no first-SPA date, no contractual vacant-possession date, no extension-of-time field, no Lewat flag and no developer-conduct record. Nothing on this project falls into the “cannot be read” category, and this page does not use the stronger phrase where the weaker one is the truth. This is what Louis will go and ask the developer for, and it is published as a list rather than left as a silence.

Questions a buyer should ask, answered from the register and from named sources

Also worth reading, for contrast

Published 14 October 2026 · last verified against the KPKT TEDUH register, the GreenRE register and the developer’s own two websites on 14 October 2026 · marketing information, not an offer. Every absence on this page was established by reading a register, with a same-session positive control, and not by failing to find something.