Pavilion Damansara Heights — both phases, both licensees, and the line the Housing Development Act draws through the middle of it

Six things about Pavilion Damansara Heights that the listings get wrong

None of these is a judgement about the development. Each one is a gap between what a government filing says and what is published for buyers to read.

Every filed unit type, by tower — including three penthouses that appear in no other source

No floor plan is published on this page, because the developer publishes none in a form this page can verify and because inventing one would be worse than omitting it. What follows is the filed type schedule with filed unit counts and, for Phase 2, filed statutory price bands — set against the developer’s own per-tower layout pages, with every disagreement named. Phase 1 has no filed per-type price band at all; only the three component-level registry bands exist.

Built-ups and unit counts above are taken from a statutory schedule or from the developer’s own per-tower layout page, never from marketing prose, and the source of each disagreement is named. Square-metre figures are the developer’s own published conversions where stated. Price figures are the filed statutory Unit Selling Price bands from the KPKT-filed advertisement particulars (Phase 2) and the KPKT register (Phase 1), labelled as such. They are not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer. The register’s own keluasan fields for Phase 1 (0–57, 0–56 and 0–214 sq m) are irreconcilable with both the filed brochure and the developer’s own schedules and are not used anywhere on this page; nor are its bedroom fields reading “1, 2, 3, 12” and “1, 2, 3, 11”, which are keying errors.

Gallery — two photographs of built work, and renders of a building that is not built yet

Every caption above is graded caption-published and none is graded confirmed, and here is exactly why. The developer’s WordPress REST API is enabled, and it is useless for this purpose: the media library holds 25 items — twelve site-progress videos, ten press-clipping PDFs, two news photographs and one file titled “thumbnail” — and not one render, artist’s impression or facility image is a library attachment. Every usable image is a hard-coded theme asset with no CMS title, so the printed caption text is the best evidence available and nothing on this project can honestly be graded confirmed. This page also deliberately does not copy the developer’s own alt text: the header logo’s alt misspells the project “Pavillion” with two Ls, two Phase 2 images carry Phase 1’s facility level numbers, and two images of the same Regent sky deck carry two different levels. On construction progress: the developer publishes twelve dated site-progress videos running March 2021 to March 2024 and the series stops at March 2024, so nothing visual covers the Phase 2 superstructure years and its own site-progress page returns no text to a fetch. There is no location map and no floor plan in this set, so this page publishes neither.

Jalan Damanlela, Pusat Bandar Damansara — and the MRT claim, checked

Not one distance on this page is estimated. Where a source publishes a figure it is attributed; where no source publishes one, that is recorded as a gap and left blank. This is a central Kuala Lumpur site where everything genuinely is close, which makes an invented figure both tempting and unnecessary.

Statutory register × 3 — the three registered phases, under two licences, side by side

Malaysian law requires a licensed housing developer to file statutory advertisement particulars, and that filing is public. Pavilion Damansara Heights has three registered phases under TWO licences, and they are not symmetrical legal objects. Phase 1 is one registered phase holding three towers as three components under one permit and one delivery clock. Phase 2 is two registered phases with separate permits, separate first-SPA dates and separate delivery clocks. So a buyer’s statutory position is set by which registered phase the unit is in, not by which tower it is in. Each column prints the particulars as the government record gives them, with the filed brochure and the developer’s own published block alongside wherever those disagree.

Read down, not across. Column (A) is one registered phase containing three towers under one permit and one delivery clock; columns (B) and (C) are two registered phases with separate permits and separate clocks under the same licence. “Phase 1” and “Phase 2” are therefore not symmetrical legal objects on this development, and the only thing that fixes your statutory position is which registered phase your own agreement names. Verify every value above yourself at teduh.kpkt.gov.my under developer code 19224 or 30216.

Sources for this table, named: the KPKT TEDUH developer register for codes 19224 and 30216; the TEDUH project records 19224-1, 30216-1 and 30216-2, plus the hard 404s on 19224-2 and 30216-3; the two KPKT-filed HIMS advertisement brochures for the Phase 2 phases; the Phase 1 HIMS file, which is a floor-plan brochure and not a statutory block; and the developer’s own published permit page. Where the developer’s own filing and the developer’s own website disagree — and on the Imperial plan reference and on every Phase 2 completion date they do — both are printed above and neither is asserted as operative.

Can a foreign buyer purchase here? Almost always yes — and the exception is 84 specific units

Kuala Lumpur, as a Federal Territory, applies a minimum purchase price of RM1,000,000 per unit for a foreign buyer, with consent processed federally by the Economic Planning Unit. The threshold traces to the Ministry of Economy’s Garis Panduan Perolehan Hartanah effective 13 July 2022, over section 433B of the National Land Code (Revised 2020) (Act 828). It is a policy threshold, so have it confirmed in writing before you advise or act.

Working off the filed statutory minima only: Windsor from RM1,042,360, Regent from RM1,022,000, Crown from RM3,759,060 and Imperial from RM5,429,000 all clear the floor outright — every unit in four of the five towers. Royal Suites is where it is not clean. Eight of its ten filed types clear the floor from J1 (from RM1,036,000) upward, but type S1 (452 sq ft, 41 units, filed band RM754,000 to RM1,188,000) and type S2 (538 sq ft, 43 units, filed band RM892,000 to RM1,403,000) STRADDLE it — both bands start below RM1,000,000 and end above it. So some of those 84 units qualify a foreign buyer and some do not, and which ones depends on the individual unit’s price.

The honest headline: of the 1,958 residential units filed across both phases, 1,874 sit in types whose filed minimum already clears the Kuala Lumpur floor, and the only question marks are the 84 smallest Royal Suites units. The 1,958 / 1,874 / 84 arithmetic is mine; the bands and unit counts are filed. For comparison, since Louis also sells across the border: Selangor Zones 1 and 2 require RM2,000,000, strata and gated landed strata only; Zone 3 (Hulu Selangor and Sabak Bernam) RM1,000,000. Ask me to put the current Kuala Lumpur position in writing before you commit.

What the filed progress percentages mean, and what they do not

Imperial Residences is filed at 54.61% and Royal Suites at 56.50%, both Lancar (on schedule), on the latest progress report in the register. That is a construction-progress figure certified under the housing-development reporting regime; it is not a sales figure and it is not a guarantee of a delivery date. Phase 1 is filed Siap Dengan CCC at 100% on all three components.

The useful reading is this. The Phase 2 superstructure contract was let in May 2020 for 42 months, and the register’s first Phase 2 sale and purchase agreements are 21 November 2025 and 9 April 2026. Phase 2 was built most of the way up before it was sold — the reverse of the usual Malaysian sequence, and genuinely good news for a buyer, who is buying into a structure already more than half built. It also makes the 2030 revised delivery dates look conservative rather than alarming — but the date that binds anyone is the one in their own Schedule H agreement read with the approved extension, and no page can tell you that; only your own agreement can.

What this page does not publish, and why — read this before you ask me for a number

No discount, rebate, nett price, promotion, freebie, incentive, commission, Bumiputera value, leaseback rate, guaranteed rental return or yield projection appears anywhere on this page, and none will be quoted in writing on a public channel. That is a standing rule on this website and it is not negotiable. A Diskaun Bumiputera field DOES exist in both Phase 2 filed brochures and in both of the developer’s own published statutory blocks. Its existence is stated here and its value is withheld.

What IS published instead: the filed statutory Unit Selling Price minimum and maximum per registered phase and, for Phase 2, per unit type, exactly as the KPKT-filed advertisement brochure and the KPKT register print them — labelled as the filed statutory range, and not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer. On both Phase 2 phases the register’s band matches the filed brochure’s band to the ringgit.

Deliberately withheld as well, and why. One major portal carries a “sale price from” figure for this development that sits roughly two orders of magnitude below the lowest filed statutory minimum on the whole site, plus a price-per-square-foot range whose floor is a small two-figure number, plus a resale-listing average. Those are agent-listing aggregates, not a developer floor, and the figures are not reproduced here. An independence check was run: the two portals carrying such figures are different publishers, but neither carries a developer “from” price — both carry listing aggregates only, so no source anywhere carries a below-minimum DEVELOPER price. Agent listing prices for the non-HDA Corporate Towers and Corporate Suites are also withheld, because no filed statutory minimum exists for those units at all and so there is nothing to check them against.

Also absent by choice: any density figure, because no filing prints a land area for either phase and every denominator in circulation is a whole mixed-use parcel carrying offices, a hotel and a mall; any estimated distance, drive time or walking time; any green certification for a home, because the only rating in existence is a provisional 2019 office rating; any award, because there are none; the register’s own Phase 1 area and bedroom fields, which are demonstrably wrong; and the mall’s parking count, which is a retail figure and not a residential allocation.

Ask me for any of it privately and I will go and get it in writing — and tell you plainly if the answer is that nobody will put it in writing.

Pavilion Damansara Heights — frequently asked questions, answered from the filings

Other Kuala Lumpur pages built the same way

Published 9 October 2026 · Last verified 9 October 2026 against the KPKT TEDUH developer registers for codes 19224 and 30216, the TEDUH project records 19224-1, 30216-1 and 30216-2 (and the hard 404s on 19224-2 and 30216-3), the two filed HIMS advertisement brochures for Pavilion Damansara Heights Phase 2, the Phase 1 HIMS floor-plan file, the developer’s own published advertising-permit page and its five tower pages, the Bursa Malaysia contract announcements of the main contractor and the piling contractor, a rating agency’s December 2021 report as reported by named journalism, and the GreenRE Platinum, Gold, Silver and Bronze registers. Marketing information only — not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer. Statutory particulars can change; verify at teduh.kpkt.gov.my before you act.