Trinity Rainfora, Bandar Kinrara — registered as Residensi Rimba Flora, and with no statutory block published anywhere
Every other project page on this site is built around the developer’s legally filed advertisement particulars. For this scheme that document could not be obtained, and the developer publishes no equivalent of its own — no licence number, no APDL, no approving authority, no building plan reference, no restriction in interest, no chargee and no statutory price range. That absence is the most important thing on this page, so it is at the top of it. What follows instead comes from the Selangor state housing registry, from the developer’s marketing, and from my own arithmetic — each labelled as such, line by line.
No price list, no quotation, no offer. The only price figure on this page is a Selangor state controlled-price registry band, labelled as such. No filed statutory minimum and maximum exists for this scheme in any public source, and this page does not put a marketing figure in its place.
Key facts at a glance — and the gap where the statutory block should be
On every other page in this series the first column of this table is “as filed with the National Housing Department”. Here there is nothing to put in that column. So each row below names where its figure actually comes from: the LPHS e-Quosel state project registry, the LPHS controlled-price register, July 2025 list, the developer’s marketing, or my own arithmetic. Nothing is presented as statutory that is not.
- Filed statutory particulars (KPKT)
- None obtainable, and none published by the developerNo developer licence number, no APDL, no approving authority, no building plan reference, no restriction in interest, no chargee and no filed price range exists in any public source
- Registered scheme name
- RESIDENSI RIMBA FLORAMarketed as Trinity Rainfora / Trinity Rainfora Residences. Nothing on the developer’s own site discloses the registered name
- Registered developer (licensee)
- DARUL DINASTI SDN BHDCompany no. 563438-T, per the LPHS state registry. Every news article, the press release and the project site name Trinity Group Sdn Bhd instead
- Developer licence number and APDL
- Not published by anyoneKPKT HIMS is login-only, and its file path needs a licence serial that no public source prints. I will not invent one
- Building type as the state classifies it
- Pangsapuri Perkhidmatan Mampu Milik — affordable-tier serviced apartmentAll marketing and both major portals call it a condominium. This is a material classification difference, not a wording quibble
- Registry project descriptor
- Transit Oriented Development — 31 storeys over a 9-storey podiumLPHS e-Quosel registry, verbatim
- Tenure
- Freehold (Pegangan Kekal)LPHS registry; PropertyGuru and EdgeProp agree. No lease expiry applies
- Total units
- 535 residential — Menara A1 157, Menara A2 80, Menara B 298Plus 9 commercial units. Marketing describes two towers; the registry records three Menara
- Land area
- 2.4 acres (0.97 hectares)LPHS registry; EdgeProp’s metric figure agrees arithmetically
- Density (my arithmetic, not a published figure)
- about 223 units per acre535 ÷ 2.4 acres. About 227 per acre counting the 9 commercial units. That is dense for Puchong high-rise
- Minimum built-up — two different answers
- Registry: from 550 sq ft · Marketing: from 739 sq ftA 189 sq ft gap on the entry unit. No source publishes a reconciliation. Possibly the controlled-price tier, but nobody says so
- Expected completion — three different answers
- 24 August 2026 (state registry) · Q3 2027 (press) · 2028 (portals)The registry date is the governing one and it has already passed without completion. See the timeline
- State controlled-price registry band
- RM270,000LPHS controlled-price register, July 2025 list, for the controlled-price component of the scheme. A public government registry band, not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer
- Statutory unit selling price minimum and maximum
- Does not exist in any public sourceThere is no filed minimum and maximum to quote, and this page does not substitute a marketing figure for one
- Restriction in interest and encumbrance
- Neither is published by any sourceHave your solicitor confirm both on the title search before you pay a booking fee
- Land title category
- Not publishedThe state registers the scheme as a serviced apartment, which in Selangor normally sits on commercial-category land with commercial utility tariffs. Verify the title category
- Car park bays
- Not published by anyoneNo levels, no total bay count and no per-unit allocation from any source
- Green certification
- None claimed, none found“Eco-friendly” and the greenery percentages are marketing wording, not a certification
- Awards for this project
- NoneTrinity Group’s award record belongs to other projects and is not lent to this one on this page
- Registered project address
- Lot 447, Jalan BK 5A/1, Bandar Kinrara 5, 47180 Puchong, Selangor Darul EhsanMukim Petaling, Daerah Petaling — LPHS registry
Jump to what you came for
This page is organised the way a buyer actually asks questions — starting with the documents that are missing.
Six things to know before you view — beginning with the one that is not there
None of this is a criticism of the building. These are gaps and disagreements between documents. You are better off reading them here than discovering them at the signing table.
There is no statutory particulars block to read — at all
Malaysian law requires a licensed housing developer to file advertisement particulars and to display them. For most schemes that document is public and is the single most useful thing a buyer can read. For this one it could not be obtained: KPKT’s HIMS portal is login-only and its file paths are built from a developer licence serial that no public source anywhere publishes for this project. The developer publishes no equivalent either — a full text scan of rainfora.com.my, including the raw page content behind it, returned no match for licence, permit, APDL, validity, approving authority, encumbrance, restriction, Bumiputera, selling price or expected date. So the usual cross-read between the government filing and the developer’s own block could not be done. That is the honest headline, and this page does not dress a marketing figure up as a statutory one to fill the hole.
The licensee is not the company every source names
The LPHS e-Quosel state project registry and the LPHS controlled-price register, July 2025 list both record the registered developer as DARUL DINASTI SDN BHD (563438-T). Every news article, the press release and the project website attribute the development to Trinity Group Sdn Bhd. PropertyGuru splits the difference: “Developer: Darul Dinasti Sdn Bhd (developed by Trinity Group Sdn Bhd)”. Darul Dinasti is the entity your sale and purchase agreement will be with. Its registered office address, and its formal shareholding relationship to Trinity Group, are not published anywhere — the only link in the public record is a trinitygroup.com.my e-mail address on the state registry entry.
The registered name is Residensi Rimba Flora, and nothing public uses it
Search KPKT, TEDUH or the Selangor registry for “Trinity Rainfora” and you will find nothing. The registered scheme name is RESIDENSI RIMBA FLORA, and that is the name that will appear on your sale and purchase agreement, your loan documents and eventually your strata title. Only EdgeProp’s new-launch record prints both names together. This is a naming difference, not a sign that something is wrong — but a buyer who does not know it cannot check the project against any government record.
The state calls it affordable-tier serviced apartment; marketing calls it a condominium
The Selangor registry classifies the scheme as “Pangsapuri Perkhidmatan Mampu Milik” — a serviced apartment in the Mampu Milik (affordable) tier. PropertyGuru says “Condominium”, EdgeProp says “Condominium/Apartment”, and the developer says “residences”. This matters in money terms, not just wording: serviced apartments in Selangor normally sit on commercial-category land, with commercial utility tariffs and assessment, and financing terms can differ. No source publishes the land or title category, so this has to be asked and seen in writing.
Two different minimum unit sizes, 189 sq ft apart
The state registry records the built-up as “dari 550 kaki persegi” — from 550 sq ft. The developer’s own banner says “from 739 sq. ft.” That is a 189 sq ft gap on the entry unit, which is roughly a quarter of the smaller figure. The likeliest explanation is that the registry figure covers a controlled-price component of the scheme that is not in the open-market brochure, but no source states that, and no source publishes how many units sit in that tier or who qualifies for them. This is probably the single most important unresolved thing on this page.
Three completion dates, and the governing one has already gone past
The state registry gives expected completion as 24 August 2026. The press release and StarProperty say Q3 2027. PropertyGuru and EdgeProp say 2028. That is a two-year spread across the record. The registry date is the governing one — and as of October 2026 it has passed, while the developer’s own site-progress gallery was still posting construction photographs in June 2026. Ask for the contracted vacant possession date in the sale and purchase agreement, which is the only date that carries a remedy.
The project itself — what is actually being built
Three Menara of 157, 80 and 298 units — 535 homes and 9 commercial lots — rising 31 storeys over a nine-storey podium on a 2.4-acre freehold site at Lot 447, Jalan BK 5A/1. The developer’s strongest genuine claim here is the 400-metre covered walkway to the Kinrara BK 5 LRT station; its weakest is the greenery framing, because the arithmetic below puts the scheme at roughly 223 units per acre.
Facilities, and the level schedule that does not exist
The developer claims 36 holistic facilities. About fifteen of them are actually named in public material; the rest are a number without a list. Worse, the developer’s two documents place them differently: the developer’s own press release says the 36 are spread “across podium, levels 20, 30, and rooftop”, while StarProperty reports “36 holistic facilities across podium level” — one level. Those two descriptions are mutually exclusive. No itemised, level-by-level schedule is published by anyone, so the columns below group by what is named rather than by level.
Named by the developer — nature and recreation
- Rainforest Canopy, with a waterfall Jacuzzi
- Nature Playscape
- Rainforest Glamping / Glamping Forest
- Moonlit Skyrun jogging trail — 150 m (marketing)
- Infinity pool — 25 m (marketing)
- Aqua Gym
- Edible Garden
Named by the developer — indoor and work
- Gym Room
- Study Garden
- Co-working spaces
- Grand Lobby
- Yoga Deck
- Rooftop Sky Garden / sky terrace
- Retail Street — the 9-unit commercial component
The arithmetic on “36 facilities”
- About 15 of the claimed 36 are named anywhere in public material. The other 21 are a count without a list.
- Level grouping: “podium, levels 20, 30 and rooftop” per the developer’s press release, versus “across podium level” per StarProperty. The developer’s own publicity contradicts itself.
- Green-space claims are marketing, uncertified: 40% greenery in the facilities podium, 53% greenery on the sky terrace.
- Ask for the facilities schedule annexed to the sale and purchase agreement. That is the only list that binds anybody.
Car parking
- No source publishes car park levels, a total bay count, or a per-unit allocation. Not the registry, not the developer, not the portals.
- For a 535-unit scheme on 2.4 acres this is a question worth pressing before you book anything — get the allocation written into the sale and purchase agreement.
Dates on the record — and how far apart they are
Layouts — marketing only, because no filed schedule exists
Every area below is a marketing figure from rainfora.com.my, cross-checked against PropertyGuru and EdgeProp. No government filing of the per-type schedule was obtained, so not one figure here is government-sourced — which is the opposite of how this site normally presents layouts, and worth saying out loud. Square-metre values are my own conversion from the published square feet at 10.7639 sq ft to the square metre, not published figures. Unit counts per type are not published by anyone; only the per-Menara totals of 157, 80 and 298.
Type B / B1
The marketed entry unit and the anchor of the “from 739 sq. ft.” banner. EdgeProp’s own new-launch record puts it at 743 sq ft — a 4 sq ft difference, small but a reminder that no filed schedule exists to settle it. Note separately that the state registry records the scheme’s minimum built-up as 550 sq ft, 189 sq ft below this type.
Request the Type B planType C
The smaller of the three-bedroom layouts. No filed counterpart exists to check the area or the bathroom count against, and the developer does not state which Menara carries it.
Request the Type C planType D / D1
A larger three-bedroom at just over a thousand square feet. The D and D1 designations are not separately dimensioned by the developer, so whether they differ in layout, in facing, or only in mirroring is not published.
Ask what separates D from D1Type E — dual key
The only dual-key layout in the marketed schedule — two lockable sub-units behind one entrance door, which matters for rental use and for how the unit is described on resale. With no filed schedule, confirm the dual-key arrangement on the stamped plan rather than from the brochure.
Ask about the dual-key layoutType F
A four-bedroom with only two bathrooms, at twelve square feet larger than the 3+1 dual key. Four bedrooms sharing two bathrooms is a real daily constraint for a family; see the plan before you decide it works.
Request the Type F planType G
The largest residential layout and the top of the marketed “739 to 1,184 sq ft” range. EdgeProp states the range in metric as 68.66 to 110 square metres, which is consistent with the square-foot figures by conversion.
Request the Type G planThe 550 sq ft the registry records and marketing does not
The Selangor state registry entry records the scheme’s minimum built-up as 550 sq ft. There is no marketed type at that size — the smallest in the brochure is 739 sq ft. The registry also classifies the scheme as Mampu Milik (affordable tier) and lists a controlled price for it, which suggests a controlled-price component that the open-market brochure does not cover. Nobody publishes how many such units exist, what sizes they are, who is eligible, or whether they are in a particular Menara. I am not going to guess. This is the first question I would put to the sales gallery.
Ask about the 550 sq ft tierCommercial component — Retail Street
Nine commercial lots at the podium, marketed as a “Retail Street”. The developer’s publicity puts the entry price for these at RM3.5 million, a marketing figure reported by StarProperty and EdgeProp and not a statutory one. Whether the Retail Street is separately strata-titled, and how its unit sizes are split across the nine lots, is not published.
Ask about the Retail Street lotsUnit counts per layout type, which types sit in which Menara, stack facing and orientation, balcony sizes, ceiling and floor-to-floor heights, lifts per core and the lift-to-unit ratio, maintenance fee and sinking fund rates, and share units are not published by any source. Square-metre figures on this page are my conversions, not published values.
Gallery — and exactly how confident I am about each image
All eight images on this page come from the developer’s own site at rainfora.com.my and were each verified as reachable before use. Every subject on this page is inferred from a file name. Unlike most projects, this developer’s content management system carries no descriptive image titles, so there is not one image here whose subject I can call confirmed, and I have captioned each one accordingly. A large part of the media library is generic theme filler — files named feature1 to feature9, hero-thumbnail, leaf-bg, Artboard and Asset sets — which are not project renders, and none of those are used here. The facility renders in the site’s own carousel (Nature Playscape, Rainforest Glamping, Moonlit Skyrun, Rainforest Canopy, Gym Room, Study Garden, Grand Lobby) could not be resolved to stable direct URLs, so they are absent rather than guessed at. All renders are artists’ impressions, subject to change and to the authorities’ approval.
Ask for the latest site progress setLocation — and the developer contradicting itself on one distance
The registered project address is Lot 447, Jalan BK 5A/1, Bandar Kinrara 5, 47180 Puchong, in Mukim Petaling, Daerah Petaling, Selangor. Every distance below is developer-published and rounded to the whole kilometre with no stated measurement method — no third party has independently measured any of them, and I am not going to estimate one. The 400 m to the LRT is the only figure corroborated by more than one source.
Map pin is the township, not the exact lot. Approving local authority: not published by any source, so not stated here — Bandar Kinrara sits within MBSJ territory, but no document confirms the approving authority for this scheme.
Rail — the one genuinely strong figure
- Kinrara BK 5 LRT station (Sri Petaling line) — 400 m, reached by a 400-metre covered walkway. Published by the developer and repeated by BusinessToday, EdgeProp and the press release, which makes it the best-corroborated distance on the page.
- No third party publishes an independent measurement of it. Walk the covered link yourself at the hour you would actually use it.
Malls and groceries — and a 2× self-contradiction
- Giant Hypermarket — 1 km (developer)
- Pavilion Bukit Jalil — 6 km per rainfora.com.my, but 3 km per the developer’s own press release. The developer’s own two documents are a factor of two apart on the same mall. Both are shown here; neither is independently verified.
- SetiaWalk Mall — 6 km (developer)
- IOI Mall — 7 km (developer)
- Lotus’s Puchong — 7 km (developer)
- Sunway Pyramid — 8 km (developer)
Schools and education
- SJK (C) Yak Chee — 3 km (developer)
- Tzu Chi International School — 4 km (developer)
- SJK (C) Lai Meng — 5 km (developer)
- SK Puchong Jaya — 5 km (developer)
- IMU University — 6 km (developer)
- Monash University Malaysia — 7 km (developer)
- Taylor’s University Lakeside Campus — 8 km (developer)
- Asia Pacific University — 10 km (developer)
Healthcare
- KPJ Ambulatory Care Centre Kinrara — 400 m (developer)
- Sunway Medical Centre — 6 km (developer)
- Columbia Asia Hospital — 7 km (developer)
Parks and recreation
- Kinrara Golf Club — 2 km (developer)
- Bukit Jalil Recreational Park — 6 km (developer)
- Wawasan Hill Trail entrance — 7 km (developer)
- National Stadium Bukit Jalil — 8 km (developer)
Highways — named, never measured
- Bukit Jalil Highway, the Damansara–Puchong Expressway (LDP) and the Shah Alam Expressway (KESAS) are all named by the developer and by EdgeProp.
- No source publishes a distance to any interchange or ramp. I will not estimate one. Drive the route at the hour you would actually commute.
Developer distances are whole-kilometre roundings with no stated method, and the Pavilion Bukit Jalil figure differs between the developer’s website and its own press release. No source publishes a distance to the nearest wet market, to a primary school other than the four named, or to any highway interchange.
The register — a state record, because no filed advertisement exists
This is not a filed advertisement-particulars block, and it is not labelled as one. It is the Selangor housing board’s own project record, and it is the best public document that exists for this scheme. The federal filing that normally sits here could not be obtained for the reasons set out below, and the developer publishes nothing equivalent. Sources: the LPHS e-Quosel state project registry and the LPHS controlled-price register, July 2025 list.
| Registered scheme | Registered developer | Company no. | Classified building type | Registry descriptor | Storeys | Units | Commercial | Land area | Minimum built-up | Tenure | Mukim / Daerah | Expected completion | State controlled-price band | Developer tel. on file |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RESIDENSI RIMBA FLORA | DARUL DINASTI SDN BHD | 563438-T | Pangsapuri Perkhidmatan Mampu Milik (affordable-tier serviced apartment) | Transit Oriented Development — 31 tingkat dengan podium 9 tingkat | 31, over a 9-storey podium | 535 — Menara A1 157, A2 80, B 298 | 9 units | 2.4 ekar (acres) | Dari 550 kaki persegi (from 550 sq ft) | Pegangan Kekal (freehold) | Petaling / Petaling | 24-08-2026 | RM270,000 | 03-8062 9009 |
Read that row as a state registry record, not as a filed advertisement. It carries no National Housing Department approval stamp, no developer licence number, no APDL and no statutory price range, because a state project register is a different document from the federal advertisement particulars. The LPHS controlled-price list records a second, different telephone number for the same developer — 03-8084 1888 — which is also the number on the developer’s own sales gallery page. Two Selangor government registers, two numbers.
The RM270,000 figure is a state controlled-price registry band from the Selangor harga kawalan register, applying to the controlled-price component of the scheme. It is a public government record. It is not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer, it is not a developer price, and it must not be read against any open-market figure as though the difference were a reduction — they are different categories of unit. No filed statutory minimum and maximum exists for this scheme in any public source, so there is nothing on this page to test a marketed figure against.
Why there is no filed statutory block here, in detail
Four routes were tried and all four came up empty. One: KPKT’s HIMS repository stores filed particulars at a path built from the developer licence serial, which is embedded in the APDL number — and no public source anywhere publishes a licence or APDL number for this project, so there is no serial from which to build the path. HIMS itself is login-only, with no public project search. Two: the developer’s own site publishes no statutory block; a full text scan of the page, including the raw content behind it, found no occurrence of licence, permit, APDL, validity, approving authority, encumbrance, restriction, Bumiputera, selling price, expected date, total units or tenure. Three: the Trinity Group corporate site, including its current-projects and site-progress pages for this scheme, carries no statutory or licence details. Four: the press release carries no statutory disclaimer or APDL reference, and both major portals record licence and APDL as not disclosed. The consequence is that the cross-read this site normally performs — government filing against the developer’s own block — could not be done at all. The only cross-read available was between two Selangor state registers and the developer’s marketing, and those disagree on the name, the licensee, the building type, the minimum built-up and the completion date.
Exactly what to ask for at the sales gallery, and what each answer is worth
Take this list with you. One: the developer’s licence — ask for the number and the validity period, and check the validity covers the date you sign. Two: the advertising and sale permit (APDL) certificate on display — ask for its number and expiry; a developer may not advertise or sell without a current one. Three: the filed advertisement particulars page itself, which the law requires to be displayed — photograph it. Four: the approving authority and the building plan reference number. Five: the restriction in interest and the encumbrance — is the land charged, and to which bank. Six: the land and title category, residential or commercial, for a scheme the state registers as a serviced apartment. Seven: the statutory unit selling price minimum and maximum as filed. Eight: whether Menara A and Menara B are separately licensed phases with their own particulars. Nine: the controlled-price component — how many units, what sizes, what eligibility. Ten: the car park allocation per unit type, in writing. If the gallery cannot produce the licence and the permit, that on its own tells you something.
A note on the Selangor registry links, because one of them is broken
The project record sits at kuotalphs.selangor.gov.my/projectDetail/19 and the controlled-price list is downloadable from ehartanah.lphs.gov.my. Be aware that lphs.selangor.gov.my presents a broken TLS certificate and your browser will warn you about it; that is a government server misconfiguration, not a sign of anything fraudulent. The working hosts are ehartanah.lphs.gov.my and www.lphs.gov.my. I mention it because a buyer who hits the certificate warning while trying to verify this project may reasonably assume the registry itself is suspect.
Foreign buyers — the Selangor threshold that applies here
Bandar Kinrara is in the Petaling district, which is Selangor Zone 1. The state’s minimum purchase price for a foreign buyer in Zone 1 and Zone 2 is RM2,000,000, and foreign purchase is restricted to strata-titled property and gated landed strata. Zone 3 — Hulu Selangor and Sabak Bernam — is RM1,000,000. By comparison, Kuala Lumpur and the Federal Territory sit at RM1,000,000 with EPU consent. No published figure for this scheme approaches RM2,000,000 on the residential side, so a foreign buyer should treat residential eligibility here as unlikely and verify it in writing with the developer and the Selangor state authority before paying anything. State consent and the policy prevailing at the time of purchase govern, and thresholds change. The commercial lots are a different question with different rules.
What this page does not publish, and why
No discount, rebate, nett price, promotional package, freebie, incentive, commission, Bumiputera discount percentage, leaseback or guaranteed-rental-return rate, or yield and ROI projection appears anywhere on this page, as a matter of standing policy. Beyond that: PropertyGuru aggregates agent listings into a range running from the mid-four-hundred-thousands to the high millions at a quoted price per square foot. That is a listing aggregate whose upper bound reflects commercial lots, not a developer price and not a statutory one, and it is not reproduced here as either. Press-reported launch prices for the residential phases exist in the public record and sit materially above the state controlled-price band, in a different category of unit; with no filed statutory minimum and maximum in existence, there is nothing to test them against, so this page records that they exist rather than presenting them as the project’s price.
Not published by anyone — the full list
Statutory and legal: developer licence number and validity; APDL number and validity; statutory unit selling price minimum and maximum; the filed built-up schedule per type; the approving authority; the building plan reference; restriction in interest; encumbrance and chargee bank; land title category; lot and title particulars beyond Lot 447, Jalan BK 5A/1; whether Menara A and Menara B are separately licensed; Darul Dinasti’s registered office address and its formal relationship to Trinity Group; Trinity Group Sdn Bhd’s own company registration number. Physical and product: car park levels, total bays and bays per unit; unit count per layout type; which types sit in which Menara; lifts per tower and the lift-to-unit ratio; ceiling and floor-to-floor heights; maintenance fee and sinking fund per square foot; share units; the full itemised 36-facility list and the level each sits on; whether the Retail Street is separately strata-titled; the controlled-price unit count, sizes and eligibility; the Bumiputera quota allocation; stack facing and balcony sizes. Delivery: construction progress percentage — the site-progress page is photographs only; the contracted vacant possession date reconciled against the three completion dates in the record; and detail on the main contractor, named as Jasmuni Construction, and the architect, named as Visage Architect.
Defect liability and the Gold Assurance programme — stated as what it is
The developer promotes a “Gold Assurance Programme” comprising a 36-month defects liability period, a 10-year roof leak warranty and a 5-year tile pop-up warranty. This is reported by EdgeProp and in the press release and is a developer commitment, not an award and not a certification. The statutory defects liability period under the Housing Development Act applies regardless. Anything offered beyond it belongs in the sale and purchase agreement in writing, not in a brochure.
The developer — and which entity you are actually buying from
The registered developer of Residensi Rimba Flora is DARUL DINASTI SDN BHD, company number 563438-T, per the LPHS e-Quosel state project registry and the LPHS controlled-price register, July 2025 list. Its registered project address on file is Lot 447, Jalan BK 5A/1, Bandar Kinrara 5, 47180 Puchong, in Mukim and Daerah Petaling, and the e-mail address on the registry entry is planning@trinitygroup.com.my.
Every consumer-facing source names a different company. rainfora.com.my carries “A Signature Project by:” and “© 2025 TRINITY GROUP SDN BHD” in its footer; trinitygroup.com.my, the press release and every news article attribute the development to Trinity Group Sdn Bhd. PropertyGuru is the only source that reconciles them at all, with “Developer: Darul Dinasti Sdn Bhd (developed by Trinity Group Sdn Bhd)”. Developers routinely license each project through a single-purpose subsidiary and there is nothing irregular in that — but here the shareholding link between the two companies is not published anywhere. The only evidence connecting them in the public record is PropertyGuru’s note and a trinitygroup.com.my e-mail address on a state registry form. Darul Dinasti’s own registered office address is not published, and Trinity Group Sdn Bhd’s company registration number is not published either. Darul Dinasti is the entity whose name will be on your sale and purchase agreement, and the name to search when you check a developer’s track record.
Two Selangor government registers carry two different telephone numbers for the same developer: 03-8062 9009 on the e-Quosel project record and 03-8084 1888 on the controlled-price list. The second matches the sales gallery number on the developer’s own site. The gallery is at ZP-10, Zest Point, Lebuhraya Bukit Jalil, BK9, Bandar Kinrara, 47180 Puchong, open Monday to Sunday and public holidays, 9.30am to 6.00pm.
Awards and green certification for this project: none. No award of any kind — won, shortlisted or targeted — exists for Trinity Rainfora or Residensi Rimba Flora, and no GreenRE, GBI, LEED or equivalent certification is claimed by the developer or found in any certification source. The project site nonetheless states that Trinity’s journey “has been marked by seven prestigious property awards”, while Trinity Group’s own awards page lists fifteen entries — of which at least one is a finalist placing, one a nomination only, and four are awards to an individual rather than to a project. The developer’s own two documents do not reconcile on how many awards it has. More to the point, not one of those entries belongs to this project: the nearest are a FIABCI Malaysia Property Award 2024 for Trinity Pentamont and a StarProperty Awards 2024 merit for Trinity Wellnessa. Those are different buildings, and this page does not lend them to this one. The only green-adjacent wording here — “eco-friendly”, “units fitted with eco-friendly features”, 40% podium greenery, 53% sky-terrace greenery — is uncertified marketing language, not a certification.
On the marketing superlatives: “Klang Valley’s premier rainforest-inspired TOD” is unquantified and unsupported by any primary source, and “unparalleled value in the current market” — attributed to the managing director — is a comparative claim with no published basis. Neither is repeated here as fact. Note also that the gross development value is reported two ways and both are live in the record: RM388 million by EdgeProp and StarProperty at the September 2024 launch, and RM395 million by BusinessToday, StarProperty and EdgeProp in May 2026 — most likely a restatement over time. And the tower count differs by document: press coverage describes two 31-storey towers, Block A and Block B, while the state registry records three Menara — A1 with 157 units, A2 with 80 and B with 298. Block A appears to be A1 plus A2, 237 units, but no source actually says so. Finally, the managing director’s title appears variously as Datuk, Dato’ and Dato’ TPr. across the developer’s own press material.
The arithmetic worth sitting with: 535 residential units on 2.4 acres is about 223 units per acre, or roughly 551 per hectare; counting the nine commercial lots it is about 227 per acre. That is my own calculation from two published figures, not a published density, and it is at the dense end for Puchong high-rise. The developer makes no low-density claim, so there is no contradiction to report — but the marketing does lean hard on “abundance of greenery” and a “facilities podium with 40% greenery”, and those two things are worth reading side by side. The genuinely defensible claim here is the 400-metre covered walkway to the Kinrara BK 5 LRT station, which three independent sources repeat.
Company registration number and registry details are transcribed from the Selangor LPHS records; verify the digit grouping against the original before relying on it. The main contractor is named as Jasmuni Construction and the architect as Visage Architect by StarProperty; neither is confirmed by a developer document.
Questions buyers actually ask
Why is there no statutory particulars block on this page?
What is the registered name of Trinity Rainfora?
Who is the developer — Trinity Group or Darul Dinasti?
Is it a condominium or a serviced apartment?
How big is the smallest unit?
When will Trinity Rainfora be completed?
What is the price?
How many units and how dense is it?
Is it freehold?
How far is the LRT station?
How far is Pavilion Bukit Jalil?
How many car park bays come with a unit?
Are there really 36 facilities?
Has Trinity Rainfora won any awards, or is it green certified?
Can a foreigner buy at Trinity Rainfora?
Why does the Selangor housing board website show a certificate warning?
What should I ask for at the sales gallery?
Want the documents rather than the brochure?
I will go and ask the gallery for the developer’s licence, the APDL certificate and the filed advertisement particulars, photograph what they can show, and send you a plain list of what is confirmed against what is only marketing. For a scheme with no public statutory block, that errand is the whole value of having an agent.
All information on this page is compiled from the sources named beside each figure and is provided for general information only. It is not a price list, a quotation, an offer or an invitation to treat. No filed statutory price range exists for this scheme in any public source. Renders are artists’ impressions, subject to change and to the approval of the relevant authorities, and every image subject on this page is inferred from a file name. Verify every figure against the developer’s sale and purchase agreement and the documents on display at the sales gallery before you commit.
Louis Koh
Director, LK Group Marketing · IQI Realty Sdn Bhd · Registered Estate Agency
I work KL and Selangor new launches and I publish the filed statutory particulars rather than the brochure copy. For this project there are none to publish, and I would rather tell you that on the first screen than let you find out later. If a figure on this page matters to your decision, ask me for the document it came from — and where no document exists, I will tell you that too.
Published 2 October 2026 · Last verified 2 October 2026 · Register sourced from the Selangor LPHS e-Quosel project record and the LPHS controlled-price register (July 2025 list). No KPKT filed advertisement particulars exist in any public source for this scheme. Marketing information, not an offer.
Worth putting beside this one
The Loop Residences @ Puchong, Bandar Metro Puchong, <b>47100 Puchong</b> — <b>980 units on ONE <code>Jadual H</code> registration (<code>30557-1</code>): 842 open-market <code>SOHO</code> and <code>Pangsapuri Perkhidmatan Perniagaan</code> units PLUS 138 state-controlled <code>Mampu Milik</code> units</b> — <b>the register says <code>Belum Mula</code>, 0.00% built and NO first SPA, so the contractual VP date CANNOT BE COMPUTED while three surfaces print <code>Januari 2028</code></b> — <b>Daerah Petaling under Majlis Bandaraya Subang Jaya</b>
WhatsAppKeys @ Lakeside Residences, Bandar Metro Puchong, <b>47100 Puchong</b> — <b>158 two-storey semi-detached homes on <code>Jadual G</code></b>, three registrations on one licence (<b><code>9903-10</code> · <code>9903-11</code> · <code>9903-12</code></b>) — <b>an APPROVED 12-MONTH DELIVERY EXTENSION ON ALL THREE, mentioned on NO developer surface</b> — <b>Daerah PETALING under Majlis Bandaraya Subang Jaya, NOT Daerah Sepang</b> — and <b>6.61 homes per acre, the lowest density this site has published</b>
WhatsApp
SelangorErica Residence, Bandar Bukit Puchong — <b>Daerah SEPANG, SELANGOR</b> (not Petaling, not MBSJ): <b>68 three-storey semi-detached homes on <code>Jadual G</code></b>, KPKT project <code>6533-19</code>, <b>vacant possession contractually due 15 October 2026 with NO approved extension</b> and a <b>97.50% banded</b> progress figure — and the <b>GreenRE PLATINUM <i>provisional</i></b> rating is real while the “first landed homes in Malaysia” claim <b>is not verifiable</b>
WhatsAppBinastra Business Park @ Pulau Meranti 2, Taman Meranti Perdana, “47100 Puchong” — <b>21 three-storey factory units on 7.1 acres, ENTIRELY OUTSIDE the Housing Development Act</b> — and the proof is the developer’s own register record: <b>BINASTRA LAND SDN. BHD.</b>, code <code>9795</code>, licence <code>9795/06-2028/0866(R)</code> <b>live to 10 June 2028</b>, holds <b>SIX</b> registrations including <code>9795-6 Suria Garden @ Puchong</code> — and <b>this park is on none of them, because a factory cannot be licensed</b>. <b>TENURE IS CONTRADICTED ACROSS FIVE SURFACES</b>, floor loading is <b>10 / 5 kN/m²</b> and <b>no price is published here at all</b>. <code>Daerah SEPANG</code> is an <b>INFERENCE</b>, Selangor
WhatsApp
Freehold
FreeholdAsk a specific question
If you would rather not use WhatsApp, use this. I answer them myself. Only your name and one contact method are required.
Developer: Trinity Group (2 developments on this site)
Where it is: Puchong, Selangor