Pavilion Damansara Heights — both phases, both licensees, and the line the Housing Development Act draws through the middle of it
Search the Malaysian housing register for “Pavilion” and you will not find this development. q=PAVILION on the KPKT TEDUH developer register returns twelve licensees and neither of this project’s two licensees is among them. Phase 1 is licensed to IMPIAN EKSPRESI SDN. BHD., developer code 19224. Phase 2 is licensed to JENDELA MAYANG SDN. BHD., 201301035983 (1065811-D), developer code 30216. The route in was the company registration number printed in the microsite footer, not the brand. 1,958 units across five residential towers are filed Pangsapuri Servis on Jadual H — and the nine Corporate Towers, the Corporate Suites and Hotel block, the hotel and the mall are outside the Housing Development Act entirely.
No price list, no quotation, no offer. What is published here is the filed statutory Unit Selling Price range, labelled as filed.
Pavilion Damansara Heights at a glance — every figure as a named filing prints it
Each line below is the government register’s own value, or a filed advertisement brochure’s own value, or the developer’s own published statutory block — and where those three disagree, this page shows all of them. Phase 1 and Phase 2 are two different legal objects under two different licensees and are never merged on this page.
- Where it is
- Jalan Damanlela, Pusat Bandar Damansara / Bukit Damansara, Kuala LumpurFiled daerah Kuala Lumpur, negeri WP Kuala Lumpur on all three register records. Approving authority Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur in both Phase 2 filings. Marketing postcode 50490; not filed. Filed coordinates: Phase 1
3.146611, 101.663083; Phase 23.146350, 101.663090for both registered phases. - Licensed developer, Phase 1
- IMPIAN EKSPRESI SDN. BHD.KPKT developer code 19224, licence
19224/11-2027/1409(A), valid 23 Nov 2022 to 22 Nov 2027, status Aktif, no recorded offence, 1 registered project. Its company registration number is NOT PRINTED by the register and no filed Phase 1 advertisement exists to carry one. - Licensed developer, Phase 2
- JENDELA MAYANG SDN. BHD., 201301035983 (1065811-D)KPKT developer code 30216, licence
30216/10-2027/0215(A), valid 3 Oct 2022 to 2 Oct 2027, status Aktif, no recorded offence, 2 registered projects. Both are named Pavilion Damansara Heights Phase 2. - Registered phases
- Three, under two licencesPhase 1 = one registered phase
19224-1containing three towers as three components under ONE advertising permit. Phase 2 = TWO registered phases,30216-1(Imperial Residences) and30216-2(Royal Suites), with separate permits and separate delivery clocks.19224-2and30216-3both return a hard 404. - Units filed, both phases
- 1,958 — all Pangsapuri Servis, all Jadual HPhase 1 1,314: Windsor 568, Regent 581, Crown 165. Phase 2 644: Imperial 154, Royal 490. PropertyGuru independently publishes the same three Phase 1 tower counts and RAM Ratings independently reported 1,314. The 1,958 total is my addition of filed components.
- Storeys as FILED
- 54 · 54 · 47 · 45 · 46Windsor 54, Regent 54, Crown 47, Imperial 45, Royal 46. The facility level LABELS go higher — Level 57, Level 50/50M, Level 50, Level 51 — because Malaysian floor numbering skips numbers. The filed Phase 1 charts themselves run 01, 3A, 13A, 53A and the Royal plans include 33A and 43A. No filing anywhere says 57 storeys. Do not read a level label as a storey count.
- Sale contract
- Jadual H on all three registered phasesSo every one of the 1,958 residential units gets a Schedule H statutory sale and purchase agreement, statutory delivery periods, statutory liquidated damages for late delivery, a statutory defect liability period and a housing development account. The serviced-apartment label does NOT take this residential stock outside the Act.
- OUTSIDE the Housing Development Act
- Corporate Towers 1–9 · Corporate Tower 10 / Corporate Suites & Hotel · the hotel · the mallNo developer licence, no advertising permit, no Schedule G and no Schedule H, no statutory late-delivery remedy and no housing development account. Proved two ways: both licensees’ own register project counts (1 and 2) account for residential phases only, and
19224-2and30216-3are both 404. Nothing in the Malaysian housing register reaches the offices, the suites, the hotel or the retail. - Tenure
- Phase 2 filed Kekal — freehold. Phase 1 NOT FILED.Both Phase 2 brochures and both of the developer’s own statutory blocks print Kekal. Phase 1’s tenure appears in no filing at all — the filed Phase 1 brochure’s marketing prose says pegangan bebas and every portal says freehold, so freehold is the weight of evidence and not a filed Phase 1 fact.
- Advertising permits (APDL), live today
- All three live at 9 October 2026Phase 1
19224-1/11-2026/0931(R)-(S), 23 Nov 2025 to 22 Nov 2026 — about six weeks from today. Imperial30216-1/10-2028/0847(A)-(S), 15 Oct 2025 to 14 Oct 2028. Royal30216-2/01-2029/0022(A)-(S), 6 Jan 2026 to 5 Jan 2029. Renewal is routine, but “licensed and permitted” is a statement with a date on it. - Filed statutory Unit Selling Price — labelled as filed
- Phase 1 registry bands · Phase 2 filed brochure bandsPhase 1, registry band only, no filed advertisement to check it against: Windsor RM1,042,360–RM15,852,000 · Regent RM1,022,000–RM15,497,000 · Crown RM3,759,060–RM23,760,000. Phase 2, filed brochure and register agree to the ringgit: Imperial RM5,429,000–RM19,812,000 · Royal RM754,000–RM4,666,000. This is not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer.
- Progress and status as filed
- Phase 1 Siap Dengan CCC, 100% · Imperial 54.61% · Royal 56.50%, both LancarPhase 1 filed CCC and vacant possession: Crown CCC 22 Nov 2024 / VP 12 Dec 2024; Regent CCC 30 May 2025 / VP 16 Jun 2025; Windsor CCC 31 Dec 2025 / VP 6 Mar 2026. No source outside the KPKT register prints a single one of those six dates. PropertyGuru still publishes Phase 1 completion as “2022”.
- Approved delivery extensions
- Phase 1 +53 months · Imperial +16 · Royal +16
pindaanTempohSerahKosong: Yaon all three. Phase 1 went 36 to 89 months, moving vacant possession from 6 Dec 2020 to 6 May 2025. Both Phase 2 phases went 36 to 52 months, giving revised vacant possession 21 Mar 2030 (Imperial) and 9 Aug 2030 (Royal). Nothing outside the register mentions any of it. - Chargee and car parks
- Phase 2 only: CIMB Investment Bank Berhad · 550 and 653 baysFiled for both Phase 2 phases in the brochure and on the developer’s own block. Phase 1 has no filed chargee and no filed car-park total at all — do not carry Phase 2’s across. Get a current land search.
- Foreign buyers
- Almost a clean yes — 84 units of 1,958 are the exceptionKuala Lumpur applies a RM1,000,000 minimum purchase price per unit for a foreign buyer, with consent processed federally. Every filed minimum clears it except Royal Suites types S1 (452 sq ft, 41 units, filed from RM754,000) and S2 (538 sq ft, 43 units, filed from RM892,000), whose bands straddle the floor. The 1,958 / 1,874 / 84 arithmetic is mine; the bands and counts are filed.
- Green rating
- No residential tower holds any green rating, and the developer claims noneThe only GreenRE entry in existence for this site is SILVER PROVISIONAL, 7 March 2019, for “Pavillion Damansara Heights Parcel 2 Commercial Tower (TB) – Office” — category NRB, a non-residential building, developer Jendela Mayang. That is an office rating and this page refuses to apply it to the homes. All four tiers were read.
- Awards
- None, at project level or at group levelNo award for Pavilion Damansara Heights was found in any source reached, and the developer makes no award claim for this project on either of its own websites. Saying so is more useful than leaving it out.
- Density
- Cannot be computed cleanly, and this page will not pretend otherwiseNo filing prints a land area for either phase. Every acreage in circulation is press or marketing: 16 acres (developer), 6.5 ha (StarProperty), 15.84 acres (Wikipedia), 9.58 acres for Phase 1 (RAM Ratings). And the denominators are whole mixed-use parcels carrying nine office towers, an office-and-hotel block and a 5-to-7-storey mall, so any units-per-acre figure understates residential density.
Jump to what you came for
This page is built around two questions no portal asks about Pavilion Damansara Heights: which of these two licensed companies is selling you your unit, and is the thing you are being shown inside the Housing Development Act at all? On this site both questions have hard, checkable answers.
Six things about Pavilion Damansara Heights that the listings get wrong
None of these is a judgement about the development. Each one is a gap between what a government filing says and what is published for buyers to read.
“The developer is Pavilion Group” — no licensed developer here is called Pavilion
Pavilion Group holds no KPKT developer licence. q=PAVILION returns twelve licensees and neither of this project’s is among them; the string “Pavilion” is not in either licensee’s name. Phase 1 is IMPIAN EKSPRESI SDN BHD (19224) and Phase 2 is JENDELA MAYANG SDN BHD (30216). A positive control (q=EXSIM = 16 rows) was run before that zero was believed. One portal names a third company entirely, which is not the licensee of either phase, and this page does not repeat that attribution.
“It is all one development, so it is all protected” — it is not
1,958 residential units are inside the Housing Development Act. The nine Corporate Towers, the Corporate Suites and Hotel block, the hotel and the mall are outside it. Outside the Act there is no Schedule G or H statutory contract, no statutory liquidated damages for late delivery, no statutory defect liability period and no housing development account holding your money. You sign whatever private contract the vendor offers. If someone shows you an office suite inside this development, the law you are relying on is a different law.
“Completed 2022” — the register says otherwise, by four to five years
PropertyGuru still publishes Phase 1’s completion as 2022, and the then Federal Territories Minister said 2022 in 2017. The filed vacant-possession dates are 12 Dec 2024 (Crown), 16 Jun 2025 (Regent) and 6 Mar 2026 (Windsor). Phase 1 carries an approved +53-month extension, 36 to 89 months, moving the contractual date from 6 Dec 2020 to 6 May 2025. No source outside the KPKT register mentions the extension at all.
An extension is not automatically benign, and here it was not
Crown beat the revised date by about five months. Regent missed it by about six weeks and Windsor by about ten months — and all three landed four to five years past the date the first buyers’ Schedule H originally gave them. Whether statutory liquidated damages were payable turns on each individual agreement and on the terms on which the extension was approved. That is a question for your own solicitor and this page does not answer it. The comparisons are mine; the dates are filed.
“57 storeys” — no filing says 57
Both portals publish Windsor and Regent at 57 storeys. The register files 54. The same gap runs through every tower: Crown filed 47 against a “Level 50/50M” sky deck, Imperial filed 45 against “Level 50”, Royal filed 46 against “Level 51”. This is ordinary Malaysian floor numbering skipping unlucky numbers — the filed charts themselves run 01, 3A, 13A, 53A, and the Royal plans include 33A and 43A. A level label is not a storey count.
“GreenRE certified” — one office tower, provisionally, in 2019
The single GreenRE entry that exists is SILVER PROVISIONAL, 7 March 2019, for “Pavillion Damansara Heights Parcel 2 Commercial Tower (TB) – Office”, category NRB — non-residential building. It is an office rating, it is provisional rather than final, and it belongs to no home in either phase. All four tiers were read. Green Building Index could not be reached, which is inconclusive and never a negative. Credit where it is due: the developer makes no green claim at all on either of its own sites.
The development, tower by tower — and the dated record of what was promised against what was delivered
Five residential towers under two licences, plus a commercial estate that the housing register does not reach. The facility schedules below are the developer’s own published level-by-level lists, kept separate per tower because they genuinely differ — Crown’s garden level is a shorter list than Regent’s and Windsor’s, and this page does not merge them into one marketing list.
Facilities, as the developer publishes them — level by level, tower by tower
Not one facility on any tower page is marked “space provision”, “space only” or shell. That is a positive finding and worth saying. The LEVEL NUMBERS below are the developer’s own labels and run higher than the filed storey counts, for the floor-numbering reason explained above.
Regent Suites and Windsor Suites — identical published schedules
- Lap Pool · Children’s Pool · Lounger Deck · Linear Cascade
- Children’s Play Area · Wellness Trail · Garden Exercise Lawn
- Outdoor Lounge · Colonnade Pergola
- Game Room · Pre-function Room · Function Room with Gourmet Kitchen · Library
- Grill Kitchen at the Terrace · Day Care
- Utility / Laundrette · Changing Room · Washroom · Prayer Room
Regent Suites and Windsor Suites
- Heated Lap Pool · Submerged Lounger · Layback Jacuzzi
- Sky Terrace
- Gymnasium · Yoga
- Sauna Room · Steam Room
- Changing Room / Washroom
Crown Residences
- Lap Pool · Children’s Pool · Lounger Deck
- Children’s Play Area · Wellness Trail · Colonnade Pergola
- Game Room · Function Room with Gourmet Kitchen · Library
- Terrace Grill Kitchen · Day Care · Utility
- Changing Room / Washroom · Prayer Room
- Shorter than Regent’s and Windsor’s list: no Linear Cascade, no Outdoor Lounge, no Garden Exercise Lawn, no Pre-function Room
Crown Residences
- Heated Lap Pool · Submerged Lounger · Jacuzzi
- Sky Terrace
- Sauna · Steam Room · Changing Room / Washroom
- Level 50M: Yoga · Gymnasium
Imperial Residences (Phase 2)
- Leisure Pool · Children’s Pool · Jacuzzi · Sunken Lounge · Lounger Deck
- Herb Garden · Children’s Play Area · Wet Play Area · Garden Fitness Area
- Games Room · The Club · Meeting Room · Sitting Lounge
- Pre-function Room · Function Room with Gourmet Kitchen
- Social Sphere · Imperial Lounge · Terrace BBQ · Changing Room / Washroom
Imperial Residences (Phase 2)
- Heated Lap Pool · Jacuzzi · Sky Terrace · Sky Lounge
- Gymnasium · Dance / Yoga Studio
- Therapy Room · Sauna Room · Steam Room
- Spa / Changing Room · Washroom
Royal Suites (Phase 2)
- Lap Pool · Children’s Pool · Submerged Lounger · Lounger Deck
- Children’s Play Area · Outdoor Lounge · Terrace BBQ
- Pre-function Room · Function Room with Gourmet Kitchen
- Social Sphere · Games Room · The Club
- Utility · Washrooms · Changing Room
Royal Suites (Phase 2)
- Heated Lap Pool · Jacuzzi · Sky Terrace · Sky Lounge
- Gymnasium · Dance / Yoga Studio
- Therapy Room · Sauna Room · Steam Room
- Spa / Changing Room · Washroom · Outdoor Lounge
Development-wide, and what is NOT a tower facility
- Direct MRT connection — real and physical. A pedestrian overhead bridge from the retail area to the station, in the Phase 2 superstructure contract scope as an “MRT link bridge”, opened 15 July 2025; a temporary walkway served from October 2023 to July 2025.
- Pavilion Concierge services — published by the developer on its own concierge page and in two gallery captions. No scope, hours or inclusions are published anywhere.
- The mall is a separate commercial building, not a residents’ facility. Residents’ access is a convenience, not a strata entitlement. This page does not list mall tenants as project facilities.
- Portal facility lists on this project are worse than the developer’s own. One lists “eateries”, which is the mall, and “24-hour security”, which the developer does not state on any tower page; another publishes a four-item generic list. The developer’s own schedules are used above instead.
- NOT PUBLISHED by anyone: maintenance fee or sinking fund from the developer; car-park entitlement per unit type; bathroom count per unit type; furnishing specification for any tower; any JMB or management-corporation information or named property manager.
The dated record — every date below is filed, and the wrong ones are marked
(P), (P), (P), (A)-(S), then four (R)-(S). Every record before the current one is Tamat.pindaanTempohSerahKosong: Ya. Phase 1’s construction period becomes 89 months and its contractual vacant possession moves to 6 May 2025. The longest approved extension this series has recorded, and no source outside the register mentions it.Every filed unit type, by tower — including three penthouses that appear in no other source
No floor plan is published on this page, because the developer publishes none in a form this page can verify and because inventing one would be worse than omitting it. What follows is the filed type schedule with filed unit counts and, for Phase 2, filed statutory price bands — set against the developer’s own per-tower layout pages, with every disagreement named. Phase 1 has no filed per-type price band at all; only the three component-level registry bands exist.
Royal Suites (Phase 2, 30216-2) — 10 filed types, 490 units
S1 452 sq ft, 41 units, RM754,000–RM1,188,000, 1 bedroom · S2 538 sq ft, 43 units, RM892,000–RM1,403,000, 1 bedroom · J1 635 sq ft, 79 units, RM1,036,000–RM1,779,000, 1+study · J2 753 sq ft, 40 units, RM1,309,000–RM2,019,000, 1+study · J3 743 sq ft, 41 units, RM1,441,000–RM2,035,000, 2 bedrooms · J4 850 sq ft, 39 units, RM1,519,000–RM2,229,000, 1+study · M1 1,119 sq ft, 44 units, RM2,060,000–RM2,929,000, 2+study · M2 1,550 sq ft, 84 units, RM2,856,000–RM4,330,000, 3 bedrooms · DK1 1,302 sq ft, 39 units, RM2,674,000–RM3,312,000, 2 bedrooms + studio, dual key · DK2 1,679 sq ft, 40 units, RM3,753,000–RM4,666,000, 2 bedrooms + studio, dual key. The ten counts sum to 490, matching the filed total exactly. Two notes. J3 is SMALLER than J2 (743 against 753 sq ft) yet filed at a higher band — that is internally coherent, because J3 is a two-bedroom and J2 a one-bedroom-plus-study, but it reads like an error so this page explains it. And S1 and S2 are the 84 units whose filed bands straddle the Kuala Lumpur foreign-buyer floor. Dual key is supported by the developer’s own room list — a separable studio on DK1 and DK2, 79 units of 490. No separate-entrance or separate-meter detail is published, so this page describes the configuration and stops. Bathroom counts are NOT PRINTED for any type.
Imperial Residences (Phase 2, 30216-1) — 5 filed types, 154 units
H1 3,380 sq ft, 37 units, RM5,744,000–RM8,190,000, described by the developer as 4 ensuites plus lanai · H1a 3,380 sq ft, 35 units, RM5,429,000–RM7,560,000, 3 ensuites plus studio plus lanai · H2 4,090 sq ft, 38 units, RM7,282,000–RM9,991,000, 4 ensuites plus lanai · H2a 4,090 sq ft, 38 units, RM6,967,000–RM9,308,000, 4 ensuites plus lanai · IR1 7,459 sq ft, 6 units, RM17,397,000–RM19,812,000. The five counts sum to 154, matching the filed total exactly. Three honest points. IR1 — six units, the most expensive stock in the whole development — has no published floor plan and no published room list; it exists in the filing and in an enquiry dropdown, nowhere else. H1 and H1a are the same 3,380 sq ft, and H2 and H2a the same 4,090 sq ft, at different filed bands, and the developer publishes no explanation of the difference — not orientation, not stack, not layout. Buyers will ask; nothing answers it. And the register files Imperial’s bedrooms as “5, 6”, which the developer’s own room lists for H1, H1a, H2 and H2a do not support, so this page does not publish “5 and 6 bedrooms” as a layout fact.
Windsor Suites (Phase 1, brochure block R1) — 12 filed types, 568 units
D1 614 · D2 691 · D3 775 (two plans, Unit 02 and Unit 03) · D4 808 · D5 826 · E1 988 · E2 1,466 · E2a 1,517 · F1 1,576 · F2 1,580 · F2a 1,752 · F3 1,831 sq ft. All square-metre figures on the developer’s page are its own published conversions. Disagreements, all small and all real: E2a is 1,517 sq ft in the filing and 1,514 sq ft on the developer’s own page; F2a is 1,752 in the filing and 1,750 on the developer’s page; and D5 is read as a 2-bedroom / 2+1 study in the filing’s type list while the developer’s page calls it 1 bedroom plus study — same area, different room count, unresolved. The brochure files this block with a Sayap Utara (north) and Sayap Selatan (south) wing.
Regent Suites (Phase 1, brochure block R2) — 12 filed types, 581 units
A1 605 · A2 695 · A3 702 (all 1 bedroom) · A4 808 · A5 816 · A6 826 (1+study) · B1 1,050 (2 bedrooms) · B2 1,226 · B3 1,396 (2+study) · C1 1,473 (3 bedrooms) · C1a 1,758 · C2 1,878 sq ft (3+study). Every Regent built-up agrees between the filed brochure and the developer’s own layout page — a clean result, and worth saying when so much else on this project does not agree. The developer’s own heading for Regent, “Move-In Ready”, is TRUE and checkable against the filed CCC of 30 May 2025 and the filed vacant possession of 16 June 2025.
Crown Residences (Phase 1, brochure block R3) — 165 units, and a type the register does not seem to know about
G1 2,303 sq ft, 213.91 sq m by the developer’s own conversion, 3 bedrooms plus study plus maid’s room — filed and agreed. G2 2,803 sq ft, 260.39 sq m, 4 bedrooms plus study plus maid’s room — published by the developer and by one portal, but NOT FOUND in the filed R3 floor charts, and the register’s own filed area field for this component stops at about 214 sq m, which is roughly G1’s 2,303 sq ft. In other words the register appears not to know about G2 either. This page publishes G2 as the developer’s figure and not as a filed one.
Phase 1 penthouses — PH1, PH2 and PH3, in the filing and in NO other source
This is the single most useful layout finding on Phase 1. The filed Phase 1 advertisement brochure files three penthouse types of 6,483, 6,612 and 10,058 sq ft with up to six bedrooms, and not one of them appears on the Windsor, Regent or Crown layout page or on either portal — all of which give Phase 1’s maximum built-up as 2,803 sq ft (Crown’s G2) or 1,878 sq ft (Regent’s C2). The register corroborates them from the price side: Windsor’s filed maximum is RM15,852,000 and Regent’s RM15,497,000, and no 1,831 or 1,878 sq ft unit explains either figure. So Phase 1 contains very large penthouse stock that the public record almost entirely hides, and a page repeating “up to 2,803 sq ft” would simply be wrong. No plan, price or unit count is published for any of the three.
Corporate Suites (Phase 2) — 135 units, and NOT a home under the law
Strata office suites above hotel suites in one block, also called Corporate Tower 10. The developer’s June 2026 statement gives 135 Corporate Suites, 31 storeys at topping out and 80% of available office space sold. The main contractor’s own Bursa filing for the same block describes “1 block of 32 storey office and hotel” — 31 against 32, unresolved. One agency listing markets Corporate Tower 10 at 446,520 sf without stating the measure basis. There is no developer’s licence, no advertising permit, no Schedule G or H, no statutory late-delivery remedy, no statutory defect liability period and no housing development account on any of it, and no filed statutory price band exists, so this page publishes no price for it at all. No hotel brand, operator or room count is published by any source.
Built-ups and unit counts above are taken from a statutory schedule or from the developer’s own per-tower layout page, never from marketing prose, and the source of each disagreement is named. Square-metre figures are the developer’s own published conversions where stated. Price figures are the filed statutory Unit Selling Price bands from the KPKT-filed advertisement particulars (Phase 2) and the KPKT register (Phase 1), labelled as such. They are not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer. The register’s own keluasan fields for Phase 1 (0–57, 0–56 and 0–214 sq m) are irreconcilable with both the filed brochure and the developer’s own schedules and are not used anywhere on this page; nor are its bedroom fields reading “1, 2, 3, 12” and “1, 2, 3, 11”, which are keying errors.
Gallery — two photographs of built work, and renders of a building that is not built yet
Every caption above is graded caption-published and none is graded confirmed, and here is exactly why. The developer’s WordPress REST API is enabled, and it is useless for this purpose: the media library holds 25 items — twelve site-progress videos, ten press-clipping PDFs, two news photographs and one file titled “thumbnail” — and not one render, artist’s impression or facility image is a library attachment. Every usable image is a hard-coded theme asset with no CMS title, so the printed caption text is the best evidence available and nothing on this project can honestly be graded confirmed. This page also deliberately does not copy the developer’s own alt text: the header logo’s alt misspells the project “Pavillion” with two Ls, two Phase 2 images carry Phase 1’s facility level numbers, and two images of the same Regent sky deck carry two different levels. On construction progress: the developer publishes twelve dated site-progress videos running March 2021 to March 2024 and the series stops at March 2024, so nothing visual covers the Phase 2 superstructure years and its own site-progress page returns no text to a fetch. There is no location map and no floor plan in this set, so this page publishes neither.
Ask me for current site photographsJalan Damanlela, Pusat Bandar Damansara — and the MRT claim, checked
Not one distance on this page is estimated. Where a source publishes a figure it is attributed; where no source publishes one, that is recorded as a gap and left blank. This is a central Kuala Lumpur site where everything genuinely is close, which makes an invented figure both tempting and unnecessary.
There is no location map image on this page. The developer publishes none that this page can verify, and the button above goes to Google Maps on the filed coordinates instead. The two filed coordinate pairs sit about 29 m apart — that is my own arithmetic from the two filed figures, not a filed figure — which is consistent with two parcels of one site. The register does not separate Imperial from Royal spatially at all: both registered Phase 2 phases are filed at the same point.
The MRT connection — real, and the claim checked line by line
- The adjacent station is KG13 Pusat Bandar Damansara on the MRT Kajang Line (Line 9), between Phileo Damansara and Semantan.
- Under the station naming-rights programme it is also known as “Pavilion Damansara Heights – Pusat Bandar Damansara MRT Station”, and the Phase 2 licensee Jendela Mayang Sdn Bhd is one of the parties awarded those rights. So the “Pavilion Damansara Heights MRT station” in the marketing is a commercial co-brand on Pusat Bandar Damansara station, not a separate station. Say it, because it is exactly the kind of claim a buyer can check.
- Directly connected by a pedestrian overhead bridge from the retail area, opened 15 July 2025; a temporary walkway served from October 2023 to July 2025. The bridge is named in the Phase 2 superstructure contract scope as an “MRT link bridge”.
- “5 stations away” from the Kuala Lumpur CBD at Pavilion Bukit Bintang — the developer’s phrase, and it is CORRECT. Counting along the published line order from KG13: Semantan, Muzium Negara, Pasar Seni, Merdeka, Bukit Bintang. This is a verification, not an estimate.
- “2 stations away” from KL Sentral — the developer’s phrase, and it is LOOSE. KL Sentral is not on the Kajang Line. The two-station ride reaches Muzium Negara, which links to KL Sentral on foot. Publish the phrase with the qualification.
- Semantan station, now branded Manulife-Semantan: “within 400 m walking” — published by PropertyGuru, not by the developer.
- Bus routes named by sources with no distance or frequency published: PBD1, T817, T819, 8820, T821, T850.
Published with a distance, and attributed
- KLCC: about 7 km — PropertyGuru.
- Tun Razak Exchange (TRX): about 12.5 km — PropertyGuru.
- Bukit Kiara Park, TPC and the Royal Selangor Golf Club: “within a 5 km radius” — a radius, not a distance to any one of them. Two portals.
- SPRINT Highway and the Bangsar–Damansara elevated highway are named by sources; no distance to any interchange is published by anyone. A “new elevated link” was costed at RM200 million by the then Federal Territories Minister in October 2017.
Named by a source with NO distance published by anyone
- Schools: Cempaka International School · Mont Kiara International School · Garden International School · Alice Smith International School · HELP University
- Medical: Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur · KPJ Damansara Specialist Hospital · ANOC Neuroscience and Orthopaedic Centre · KLSMC
- Retail: Damansara City Mall · Bangsar Village I and II · Hartamas Shopping Centre · Publika · Plaza Damansara · 1 Mont Kiara
- KLIA: the developer’s own location page calls this site “the gateway to KLIA” and publishes no distance and no travel time, and KLIA is not on the Kajang Line. This page refuses the phrase.
- Not one of the schools, hospitals or malls above has a distance published by any source reached, and this page will not invent one. Ask and I will measure it for you in writing.
Every figure above is attributed to the source that publishes it. No distance, drive time or walking time on this page was estimated, rounded or inferred. Where the developer and a portal disagree, both are shown. Verify any distance that matters to your decision yourself before you act on it.
Statutory register × 3 — the three registered phases, under two licences, side by side
Malaysian law requires a licensed housing developer to file statutory advertisement particulars, and that filing is public. Pavilion Damansara Heights has three registered phases under TWO licences, and they are not symmetrical legal objects. Phase 1 is one registered phase holding three towers as three components under one permit and one delivery clock. Phase 2 is two registered phases with separate permits, separate first-SPA dates and separate delivery clocks. So a buyer’s statutory position is set by which registered phase the unit is in, not by which tower it is in. Each column prints the particulars as the government record gives them, with the filed brochure and the developer’s own published block alongside wherever those disagree.
(A) 19224-1 — PHASE 1: Windsor + Regent + Crown, 1,314 units, complete with CCC | (B) 30216-1 — IMPERIAL RESIDENCES, 154 units, 45 storeys, 54.61% built | (C) 30216-2 — ROYAL SUITES, 490 units, 46 storeys, 56.50% built |
|---|---|---|
Registered scheme name Pavilion Damansara Heights — no phase suffix, no bracketed alias, no Residensi name. A positive finding: the marketing name and the registered name are the same string.Licensed developer IMPIAN EKSPRESI SDN. BHD. Company registration no. NOT PRINTED. The register has no such field and no filed Phase 1 advertisement exists to carry one. No source gives one. No. Lesen Pemaju 19224/11-2027/1409(A) · 23/11/2022 – 22/11/2027 · LIVE · Aktif, no recorded offence, 1 registered projectNo. Permit (APDL) 19224-1/11-2026/0931(R)-(S) · 23/11/2025 – 22/11/2026 · LIVE, and it expires in about six weeksPermit history Eight records, 23 Nov 2017 to 22 Nov 2026, each 12 months except the first (24). Suffixes (P), (P), (P), (A)-(S), then four (R)-(S). Every record before the current one is Tamat.Filed advertisement brochure A file exists in the public store and it is NOT a statutory block. It is a floor-plan and unit-schedule brochure for blocks R1, R2 and R3 with no BUTIR-BUTIR IKLAN block anywhere in it. The second brochure path is a 404, the newspaper-advertisement path returns a server error, and the old-style path is a 404. Developer-published statutory block NONE. The developer’s own permit page carries Phase 2 only; its terms, disclaimer and privacy pages carry no statutory fields; the group site carries none; and the archive route is blocked in this environment, so there is no historical copy to recover. Pihak Berkuasa Melulus NOT PRINTED — no approving authority on record for Phase 1 No. kelulusan pelan bangunan NOT PRINTED — no DBKL plan reference for Phase 1 exists in any reachable source Jenis bangunan Pangsapuri Servis on all three components Jenis kontrak JADUAL H on all three components Jumlah unit 1,314 — Windsor 568 / 54 storeys, Regent 581 / 54, Crown 165 / 47. Independently corroborated twice: a portal publishes the same three counts, and a rating agency reported 1,314 across three residential towers in December 2021. Pegangan tanah NOT PRINTED in the register. The filed brochure’s own marketing prose says pegangan bebas and every portal says freehold. Weight of evidence: freehold. Not a filed Phase 1 fact. Bebanan tanah / chargee NOT PRINTED. Do not carry Phase 2’s across. Get a current land search. Sekatan kepentingan NOT PRINTED Tempat letak kereta NOT PRINTED. An encyclopaedia infobox gives “over 1,000 parking spaces” for Phase 1 — that is the MALL’S parking in a retail infobox and is not a residential allocation. Not published here as such. Keluasan tanah NOT PRINTED Tarikh PJB pertama 6 December 2017 · original period 36 bulan · original vacant possession 6 December 2020 pindaanTempohSerahKosong Ya — 53 BULAN APPROVED. New construction period 89 months. Revised vacant possession 6 MAY 2025. Nothing outside this register mentions it. Filed CCC and vacant possession Crown CCC 22/11/2024, VP 12/12/2024 · Regent CCC 30/05/2025, VP 16/06/2025 · Windsor CCC 31/12/2025, VP 06/03/2026 Status Siap Dengan CCC, all three components 100% Harga jualan, as the register prints it Windsor RM1,042,360 – RM15,852,000 · Regent RM1,022,000 – RM15,497,000 · Crown RM3,759,060 – RM23,760,000. REGISTRY BAND. There is no filed Phase 1 advertisement to check it against and no per-type band exists. Koordinat 3.146611, 101.663083 | Registered scheme name Pavilion Damansara Heights Phase 2 — the words “Phase 2” are part of the registered name, in all three sourcesTower name NOT in the statutory block and NOT in the register. “Imperial Residences” is a marketing name, and the developer’s own permit page is the only place that ties it to an APDL number. Licensed developer JENDELA MAYANG SDN. BHD. Company registration no. 201301035983 (1065811-D) — in the filed brochure, in the developer’s own block, in the website footer and in its terms page. Four of its own surfaces, all agreeing. This number was the route into the register. No. Lesen Pemaju 30216/10-2027/0215(A) · 03/10/2022 – 02/10/2027 · LIVE · Aktif, no recorded offence, 2 registered projects, both named Phase 2No. Permit (APDL) Register and the developer’s own block agree: 30216-1/10-2028/0847(A)-(S) · 15/10/2025 – 14/10/2028 · LIVE, 36 bulan. A history row carries the identical number with (N) and identical dates.TRAP — the FILED brochure prints the permit number as a bare DASH. The field is BLANK. Not an xxxxx placeholder — a dash. Without the register the number would exist nowhere but the developer’s own page. The brochure does print the validity period, 15 Oct 2025 – 14 Oct 2028.Pihak Berkuasa Melulus DEWAN BANDARAYA KUALA LUMPUR — brochure and developer block agree No. rujukan pelan bangunan THE DEVELOPER’S OWN TWO SURFACES DISAGREE. Its permit page prints BP T2 OSC 2024 2056; the KPKT-FILED brochure for this same phase prints BP T2 OSC 2025 3807, which is ROYAL SUITES’ reference. So the filed Imperial brochure appears to carry its sibling’s plan reference. The register carries no plan reference at all, so nothing breaks the tie.Jenis Pangsapuri servis / Service Apartments Jenis kontrak JADUAL H Pegangan tanah KEKAL — FREEHOLD, filed Bebanan tanah CIMB INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD — brochure and developer block agree Sekatan kepentingan NOT PRINTED Jumlah unit 154 · the filed brochure also records baki 128 unit — 128 unsold at filing Bilangan tingkat 45 in the register; NOT PRINTED in either the brochure or the developer’s block Tempat letak kereta 550 bays filed. No per-unit-type entitlement is printed anywhere. 550 ÷ 154 is about 3.6 bays per unit — my arithmetic; the entitlement comes from the agreement, not from this ratio. Keluasan binaan 3,380 – 7,459 sq ft (brochure type table and developer block agree; the register’s own field is empty) Keluasan tanah · akaun pemajuan perumahan NEITHER IS PRINTED Tarikh PJB pertama 21 November 2025 · original period 36 bulan · original vacant possession 21 November 2028 pindaanTempohSerahKosong Ya — 16 BULAN. New period 52 months. Revised vacant possession 21 MARCH 2030. Tarikh dijangka siap — FOUR ANSWERS filed brochure September 2028 · register original 21 Nov 2028 · developer press release Jun 2026 “early Q1 2029” · developer permit page March 2030 · register revised 21 Mar 2030. Three of those come from the developer itself. Kemajuan 54.61%, Lancar Diskaun Bumiputera The field exists in the filed brochure and in the developer’s own block, and its value is NOT PUBLISHED ON THIS PAGE — see the disclosure below Koordinat 3.146350, 101.663090 | Registered scheme name Pavilion Damansara Heights Phase 2 — identical to column (B). The register does not distinguish the two towers by name at all; only the permit number separates them.Tower name NOT in the statutory block and NOT in the register. “Royal Suites” is a marketing name. Licensed developer JENDELA MAYANG SDN. BHD., 201301035983 (1065811-D) No. Lesen Pemaju 30216/10-2027/0215(A) · 03/10/2022 – 02/10/2027 · LIVENo. Permit (APDL) Register and the developer’s own block agree: 30216-2/01-2029/0022(A)-(S) · 06/01/2026 – 05/01/2029 · LIVE, 36 bulan. A history row carries the identical number with (N).TRAP — the FILED brochure prints the permit number as a bare DASH AND leaves the validity period BLANK as well. Both permits are in fact live and Aktif. This is a reason to trust the register over the brochure, not the other way round. Pihak Berkuasa Melulus DEWAN BANDARAYA KUALA LUMPUR No. rujukan pelan bangunan BP T2 OSC 2025 3807 — brochure and developer block AGREE. This is also the reference that Imperial’s filed brochure mistakenly prints.Jenis Pangsapuri servis / Service Apartments Jenis kontrak JADUAL H Pegangan tanah KEKAL — FREEHOLD, filed Bebanan tanah CIMB INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD Sekatan kepentingan NOT PRINTED Jumlah unit 490 · unsold count NOT PRINTED (Imperial’s brochure gives one; this one does not) Bilangan tingkat 46 in the register; NOT PRINTED in the brochure or the developer’s block. The floor labels in the plans run to 51 and include 33A and 43A — which is the whole storey-count-versus-level-label point in one line. Tempat letak kereta 653 bays filed, for 490 units. About 1.3 per unit — my arithmetic. No per-unit-type entitlement is printed. Keluasan binaan 452 – 1,679 sq ft; every one of the ten filed built-ups matches the developer’s own layout page to the square foot Keluasan tanah · akaun pemajuan perumahan NEITHER IS PRINTED Tarikh PJB pertama 9 April 2026 · original period 36 bulan · original vacant possession 9 April 2029 pindaanTempohSerahKosong Ya — 16 BULAN. New period 52 months. Revised vacant possession 9 AUGUST 2030. Tarikh dijangka siap — FOUR ANSWERS filed brochure November 2028 · register original 9 Apr 2029 · developer press release Jun 2026 “early Q1 2029” · developer permit page May 2030 · register revised 9 Aug 2030. The spread is about 14 to 17 months — my arithmetic. Kemajuan 56.50%, Lancar. So a 2026 buyer here is buying into a structure already more than half built, not a hole in the ground — the Phase 2 construction contract was let in May 2020, five and a half years before the first sale. Diskaun Bumiputera The field exists and its value is NOT PUBLISHED ON THIS PAGE Koordinat 3.146350, 101.663090 — identical to column (B) |
Read down, not across. Column (A) is one registered phase containing three towers under one permit and one delivery clock; columns (B) and (C) are two registered phases with separate permits and separate clocks under the same licence. “Phase 1” and “Phase 2” are therefore not symmetrical legal objects on this development, and the only thing that fixes your statutory position is which registered phase your own agreement names. Verify every value above yourself at teduh.kpkt.gov.my under developer code 19224 or 30216.
Sources for this table, named: the KPKT TEDUH developer register for codes 19224 and 30216; the TEDUH project records 19224-1, 30216-1 and 30216-2, plus the hard 404s on 19224-2 and 30216-3; the two KPKT-filed HIMS advertisement brochures for the Phase 2 phases; the Phase 1 HIMS file, which is a floor-plan brochure and not a statutory block; and the developer’s own published permit page. Where the developer’s own filing and the developer’s own website disagree — and on the Imperial plan reference and on every Phase 2 completion date they do — both are printed above and neither is asserted as operative.
Can a foreign buyer purchase here? Almost always yes — and the exception is 84 specific units
Kuala Lumpur, as a Federal Territory, applies a minimum purchase price of RM1,000,000 per unit for a foreign buyer, with consent processed federally by the Economic Planning Unit. The threshold traces to the Ministry of Economy’s Garis Panduan Perolehan Hartanah effective 13 July 2022, over section 433B of the National Land Code (Revised 2020) (Act 828). It is a policy threshold, so have it confirmed in writing before you advise or act.
Working off the filed statutory minima only: Windsor from RM1,042,360, Regent from RM1,022,000, Crown from RM3,759,060 and Imperial from RM5,429,000 all clear the floor outright — every unit in four of the five towers. Royal Suites is where it is not clean. Eight of its ten filed types clear the floor from J1 (from RM1,036,000) upward, but type S1 (452 sq ft, 41 units, filed band RM754,000 to RM1,188,000) and type S2 (538 sq ft, 43 units, filed band RM892,000 to RM1,403,000) STRADDLE it — both bands start below RM1,000,000 and end above it. So some of those 84 units qualify a foreign buyer and some do not, and which ones depends on the individual unit’s price.
The honest headline: of the 1,958 residential units filed across both phases, 1,874 sit in types whose filed minimum already clears the Kuala Lumpur floor, and the only question marks are the 84 smallest Royal Suites units. The 1,958 / 1,874 / 84 arithmetic is mine; the bands and unit counts are filed. For comparison, since Louis also sells across the border: Selangor Zones 1 and 2 require RM2,000,000, strata and gated landed strata only; Zone 3 (Hulu Selangor and Sabak Bernam) RM1,000,000. Ask me to put the current Kuala Lumpur position in writing before you commit.
What the filed progress percentages mean, and what they do not
Imperial Residences is filed at 54.61% and Royal Suites at 56.50%, both Lancar (on schedule), on the latest progress report in the register. That is a construction-progress figure certified under the housing-development reporting regime; it is not a sales figure and it is not a guarantee of a delivery date. Phase 1 is filed Siap Dengan CCC at 100% on all three components.
The useful reading is this. The Phase 2 superstructure contract was let in May 2020 for 42 months, and the register’s first Phase 2 sale and purchase agreements are 21 November 2025 and 9 April 2026. Phase 2 was built most of the way up before it was sold — the reverse of the usual Malaysian sequence, and genuinely good news for a buyer, who is buying into a structure already more than half built. It also makes the 2030 revised delivery dates look conservative rather than alarming — but the date that binds anyone is the one in their own Schedule H agreement read with the approved extension, and no page can tell you that; only your own agreement can.
What this page does not publish, and why — read this before you ask me for a number
No discount, rebate, nett price, promotion, freebie, incentive, commission, Bumiputera value, leaseback rate, guaranteed rental return or yield projection appears anywhere on this page, and none will be quoted in writing on a public channel. That is a standing rule on this website and it is not negotiable. A Diskaun Bumiputera field DOES exist in both Phase 2 filed brochures and in both of the developer’s own published statutory blocks. Its existence is stated here and its value is withheld.
What IS published instead: the filed statutory Unit Selling Price minimum and maximum per registered phase and, for Phase 2, per unit type, exactly as the KPKT-filed advertisement brochure and the KPKT register print them — labelled as the filed statutory range, and not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer. On both Phase 2 phases the register’s band matches the filed brochure’s band to the ringgit.
Deliberately withheld as well, and why. One major portal carries a “sale price from” figure for this development that sits roughly two orders of magnitude below the lowest filed statutory minimum on the whole site, plus a price-per-square-foot range whose floor is a small two-figure number, plus a resale-listing average. Those are agent-listing aggregates, not a developer floor, and the figures are not reproduced here. An independence check was run: the two portals carrying such figures are different publishers, but neither carries a developer “from” price — both carry listing aggregates only, so no source anywhere carries a below-minimum DEVELOPER price. Agent listing prices for the non-HDA Corporate Towers and Corporate Suites are also withheld, because no filed statutory minimum exists for those units at all and so there is nothing to check them against.
Also absent by choice: any density figure, because no filing prints a land area for either phase and every denominator in circulation is a whole mixed-use parcel carrying offices, a hotel and a mall; any estimated distance, drive time or walking time; any green certification for a home, because the only rating in existence is a provisional 2019 office rating; any award, because there are none; the register’s own Phase 1 area and bedroom fields, which are demonstrably wrong; and the mall’s parking count, which is a retail figure and not a residential allocation.
Ask me for any of it privately and I will go and get it in writing — and tell you plainly if the answer is that nobody will put it in writing.
Two licensees, a pension-fund joint venture, a related-party main contractor, and one office green rating
There are two licensed developers on this site and neither of them is called Pavilion. IMPIAN EKSPRESI SDN. BHD. holds developer code 19224 and licence 19224/11-2027/1409(A), valid to 22 November 2027, with one registered project — Phase 1. JENDELA MAYANG SDN. BHD., 201301035983 (1065811-D), holds code 30216 and licence 30216/10-2027/0215(A), valid to 2 October 2027, with two registered projects — both named Pavilion Damansara Heights Phase 2. Both are Aktif with no recorded offence. They share one registered address, one pair of telephone numbers and one email address in the register — Unit 6-3a, Level 6, Pavilion Tower, 75 Jalan Raja Chulan, 50200 Kuala Lumpur — yet they are separate licensees with separate licences, separate permits and separate delivery clocks. Impian Ekspresi also carries eight earlier licence records from 2017 to 2025, all Tamat.
“Pavilion Group” holds no KPKT developer licence, and that is not a quibble — it is why a buyer cannot find this development in the register by searching its brand. q=PAVILION on the developer register returns twelve licensees and neither of these two is among them, because the string “Pavilion” appears in neither legal name. A positive control was run before that zero was accepted (q=EXSIM returned sixteen records, so the endpoint and the substring match were both working). The route in was the company registration number printed in the microsite footer, which gave the name Jendela Mayang, which gave code 30216; q=IMPIAN EKSPRESI then returned one hit. For a group that brands everything and licenses nothing under the brand, the footer copyright line is the key. The market gets this wrong in four different ways: the developer’s own group page says “Pavilion Group”; its microsite footer names Jendela Mayang only, which is right for Phase 2 and not for Phase 1 (its theme is literally named for Phase 2); one portal names a third company with its own registration number, which is the licensee of neither phase and is not repeated on this page; and only one consumer source names both licensees correctly. Print both codes, both licence numbers and both company names, so a client can actually run the check.
The joint venture, stated as precisely as the evidence allows. The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board is named as joint-venture partner by four independent sources including the developer’s own June 2026 press statement. Its stake is reported as 49% — and here is the honest grading: that figure rests on an encyclopaedia entry and on the filename of a press-clipping PDF in the developer’s own media library. All ten of those press-clipping PDFs are image-only with no machine-readable text layer, so the filename is the only machine-readable fact in them. Grade the 49% as filename-level evidence, not as a readable primary document. And critically: no source reached states whether that 49% sits in Impian Ekspresi, in Jendela Mayang, in both, or in a holding company above them. This page therefore does not say that the pension fund owns 49% of either licensee. No committed-capital figure was found. The site was previously held by Bukit Damansara Development Sdn Bhd via Damansara Assets Sdn Bhd, the property arm of Johor Corporation.
A related-party disclosure that a buyer is entitled to know, and that the contractor itself filed to the stock exchange. WCT Bhd is the main contractor for BOTH phases — Phase 1 at about RM1.77 billion over 38 months from September 2018 for nine office tower blocks and three service apartment blocks on a podium with retail, and Phase 2 / Parcel 2 at about RM1.2 billion over 42 months from May 2020 for one block of 32-storey office and hotel plus two residential towers, landscaping and an MRT link bridge. Econpile (M) Sdn Bhd took the Phase 2 bored piling at RM122 million over 13 months. Tan Sri Lim Siew Choon is executive chairman of the Bursa-listed main contractor’s parent and holds an indirect equity interest in Impian Ekspresi, and the contractor’s managing director sits on Impian Ekspresi’s board alongside him. He is also reported as Impian Ekspresi’s majority shareholder. So the developer and the main contractor share a controlling individual. That is a related-party transaction, it was disclosed by the contractor itself, and it is on this page because it belongs on it. Neither contract announcement prints a lot or PT number, so the lot stays unrecovered even by the route that usually recovers it.
Green: one rating exists on this entire site, and this page refuses to apply it to the homes. All four GreenRE rating tiers were read. The single entry is SILVER, PROVISIONAL, dated 7 March 2019, for “Pavillion Damansara Heights Parcel 2 Commercial Tower (TB) – Office”, category NRB v3.1 — non-residential building, developer Jendela Mayang. Four reasons it cannot be read as a project rating: it is an OFFICE building, so no residential tower in either phase holds any green rating; it is provisional, a design-stage commitment whose expiry is recorded as one year after CCC, not a verified outcome; it is dated 2019 and the categories have since moved on; and the register spells the project “Pavillion” with two Ls, which is exactly how a careless single-L search produces a false negative here. Near-misses explicitly refused: a similarly named project by a different licensee in Penang; a “Residensi Jendela” by a completely different developer; a “Permata Sapura” whose developer’s name is one word away from this one’s; and a Bronze provisional held by Pavilion Square Corporate Suites under yet another licensee — which matters here because this website already carries a Pavilion Square page, and that rating stays on it. Green Building Index could not be reached at all, which is inconclusive and never a negative. The correct wording for the homes is therefore “no entry in the reachable portion of the Platinum, Gold, Silver or Bronze registers”, not “not certified”, because three of those tables truncate on their last row. And credit where it is due: the developer makes no green claim at all on either of its websites. It is not over-claiming here.
Awards: there are none, and saying so is the finding. No award for Pavilion Damansara Heights was found in any source reached; the developer’s own group page has no awards or recognitions section at all, only a heading reading “A Globally Recognised Presence” with nothing behind it; and the group website has no awards page. Every “award-winning” formulation is refused at project level, and nothing is borrowed from any sibling Pavilion-branded project. The developer’s other published superlatives are refused for the same reason: “Malaysia’s most affluent address” is a ranking claim with no ranking behind it; “Kuala Lumpur’s most anticipated integrated development” has no measure of anticipation; “the gateway to KLIA” comes with no published KLIA distance or travel time and KLIA is not on this rail line. Two developer claims DO survive checking and are published here as true: Regent Suites’ “Move-In Ready”, against a filed CCC of 30 May 2025 and filed vacant possession of 16 June 2025; and the mall’s “Pavilion Crown” entrance feature of 2,888 Murano-glass crystals by a named fabricator. “Fully Sold” on Corporate Towers 1 to 9 is a sales statement with no independent confirmation, and it is easily conflated with two other take-up figures about two other things: 97% of office space sold plus 1.8% booked as at end-September 2021 (a rating agency, Phase 1) and 80% of available office space sold in June 2026 (the developer, the Phase 2 Corporate Suites). Three numbers, three different subjects.
Finally, the honest shape of this page. Phase 2 is unusually well documented for this series — two filed statutory blocks, a developer permit page that agrees with the register on both permit numbers and suffixes, filed tenure, a named chargee, filed car-park totals, and per-type unit counts that sum exactly to the filed totals. Phase 1 is the opposite, and that is a real gap rather than a presentational one. There is no filed statutory advertisement block for Phase 1 in any reachable source: no approving authority on record, no DBKL plan reference, no restriction in interest, no chargee, no car-park total, no land area, no company registration number for the licensee and no per-type price band. Everything in column (A) of the table above is single-sourced to the government register, the one HIMS file that exists is a floor-plan brochure with no statutory block, two sibling paths 404 or error, and the archive route is blocked in this environment, so there is no historical copy to recover. This page says so plainly rather than quietly padding Phase 1 with Phase 2’s chargee, car park, plan reference or approving authority — and it is more useful to you for admitting it.
Sources named in this section: the KPKT TEDUH developer registers for codes 19224 and 30216; TEDUH project records 19224-1, 30216-1 and 30216-2 with the 404s on 19224-2 and 30216-3; the two KPKT-filed HIMS advertisement brochures for Phase 2 and the Phase 1 HIMS floor-plan file; the developer’s own published permit page and its five tower pages; the main contractor’s and the piling contractor’s Bursa Malaysia contract announcements; a rating agency’s December 2021 report as reported by named journalism; named press of 2 October 2017, 13 October 2023 and 29 June 2026; and the GreenRE Platinum, Gold, Silver and Bronze registers, all four read. Development-wide figures that come from press or marketing rather than a filing are labelled as such throughout: the land area (16 acres from the developer, 6.5 hectares, 15.84 acres, and 9.58 acres for Phase 1 from the rating agency) and the gross development value (RM7 billion in 2016 and RM9 billion in 2017 — two published answers five years apart, and no later figure exists).
Pavilion Damansara Heights — frequently asked questions, answered from the filings
Who is the licensed developer of Pavilion Damansara Heights?
19224/11-2027/1409(A) valid 23 November 2022 to 22 November 2027, with one registered project. Phase 2 is licensed to JENDELA MAYANG SDN. BHD., 201301035983 (1065811-D), code 30216, licence 30216/10-2027/0215(A) valid 3 October 2022 to 2 October 2027, with two registered projects. “Pavilion Group” holds no KPKT developer licence at all. Searching the register for PAVILION returns twelve licensees and neither of these two is among them, because the word is in neither legal name — so a buyer searching the register by brand will find nothing. A positive control on an unrelated large developer returned sixteen records before that zero was accepted, so the search was working. Run the check yourself at teduh.kpkt.gov.my under code 19224 or 30216.How many units are there, and are they all protected by the Housing Development Act?
Which parts of this development are OUTSIDE the Housing Development Act, and what does a buyer give up?
19224-2 and 30216-3 both return a hard 404. So no registered phase exists anywhere in either licence that could cover an office tower, a suite, the hotel or the retail. Nothing in the Malaysian housing register reaches the commercial components of this development. If someone shows you an office suite here, ask in writing which licence and which permit it is sold under; the honest answer is none.Is Pavilion Damansara Heights complete? And why do the dates disagree so much?
What is this +53-month extension, and should I be worried about it?
pindaanTempohSerahKosong: Ya at 53 months: the construction period went from 36 to 89 months and contractual vacant possession moved from 6 December 2020 to 6 May 2025. Both Phase 2 phases carry +16 months each, 36 to 52, giving revised dates of 21 March 2030 and 9 August 2030. Whether you should be worried depends on what actually happened, so here it is. Crown Residences beat the revised date by about five months. Regent Suites missed it by about six weeks and Windsor Suites by about ten months — and all three landed four to five years past the date the first buyers’ agreements originally gave them. Whether statutory liquidated damages were payable to any Phase 1 buyer, and on what terms the extension was approved, is not published anywhere and is a question for your own solicitor. This page states the dates and stops. The comparisons are mine; every date is filed.Can a foreigner buy at Pavilion Damansara Heights?
Is it freehold?
Does Pavilion Damansara Heights have a green certification or any awards?
Is the MRT connection real, and is there really a Pavilion Damansara Heights station?
How many storeys are these towers? I keep seeing 57.
What is the car park allocation, the maintenance fee, and how big is the land?
What has NOT been published, that you will go and ask the developer for?
What price information will you publish, and what will you not?
Get the filed documents, and find out which licensee and which registered phase your unit actually belongs to
The KPKT register records for all three registered phases, both filed Phase 2 advertisement brochures, and a straight answer on whether the thing you are being shown is inside the Housing Development Act at all.
Certain commercial terms are deliberately withheld on this page and will not be quoted in writing on a public channel. What is published above is the filed statutory Unit Selling Price range — per registered phase for Phase 1 and per unit type for Phase 2 — labelled as such. This is marketing information. It is not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer. Statutory particulars can change — verify at teduh.kpkt.gov.my under developer code 19224 or 30216 before you act.
Louis Koh
Director, LK Group Marketing · IQI Realty Sdn Bhd · Registered Estate Agency
Over a decade selling Malaysian property, in English and Mandarin, to buyers in Kuala Lumpur, Selangor and Johor Bahru and to Chinese-speaking buyers overseas. This page is built the opposite way round from a brochure: the filed statutory particulars come first and the marketing comes last, because on Pavilion Damansara Heights the filings carry three facts a buyer cannot get anywhere else — that there are TWO licensed developers and neither is named Pavilion, that 1,958 units are inside the Housing Development Act while the nine office towers, the Corporate Suites and Hotel block, the hotel and the mall are outside it, and that Phase 1 carries an approved +53-month delivery extension that no source outside the government register mentions. It was built from the KPKT TEDUH developer and project registers, the two KPKT-filed HIMS advertisement brochures for Phase 2, the one Phase 1 HIMS file that exists, the developer’s own published permit page and all five of its tower pages, the main contractor’s and piling contractor’s Bursa announcements, a rating agency report, named journalism, and all four GreenRE rating registers. Every hard number is attributed to the document that prints it. Where the developer’s own filing and the developer’s own website disagree — and on this project they disagree on the Imperial plan reference and on every single Phase 2 completion date — both are shown and neither is asserted as operative. Where nothing was published, the page says NOT PRINTED, and on Phase 1 it says it a lot, because Phase 1’s statutory block genuinely does not exist in public. No price, distance, density, storey count, permit number or image subject on this page was invented; no award and no green certification was borrowed from a neighbour or from a sibling Pavilion project; the only green rating in existence here is a provisional 2019 OFFICE rating and this page refuses to apply it to the homes; and no density figure is published because no land area is filed for either phase. Ask me for what is missing and I will go and get it in writing — and tell you if the answer is that nobody will say.
Published 9 October 2026 · Last verified 9 October 2026 against the KPKT TEDUH developer registers for codes 19224 and 30216, the TEDUH project records 19224-1, 30216-1 and 30216-2 (and the hard 404s on 19224-2 and 30216-3), the two filed HIMS advertisement brochures for Pavilion Damansara Heights Phase 2, the Phase 1 HIMS floor-plan file, the developer’s own published advertising-permit page and its five tower pages, the Bursa Malaysia contract announcements of the main contractor and the piling contractor, a rating agency’s December 2021 report as reported by named journalism, and the GreenRE Platinum, Gold, Silver and Bronze registers. Marketing information only — not a price list, not a quotation and not an offer. Statutory particulars can change; verify at teduh.kpkt.gov.my before you act.
Worth putting beside this one
Ask a specific question
If you would rather not use WhatsApp, use this. I answer them myself. Only your name and one contact method are required.
Developer: Pavilion Group (3 developments on this site)
Where it is: Damansara Heights, Kuala Lumpur (KL)
The unit mix, the permitted price and how far up it is
None of this table is the developer’s account of itself. It is what the Ministry of Housing and Local Government records from the 7(f) returns: unit type, bedrooms and bathrooms, built-up area, unit count, the price range on the permit, and the certified percentage complete. A brochure price can be revised; the price on the permit was filed. A brochure need not mention progress; the percentage is certified. The status vocabulary is theirs too: Lancar (on schedule), Lewat (behind), Sakit (sick), Terbengkalai (abandoned).
19224-1 · PAVILION DAMANSARA HEIGHTS
Overall status: Siap Dengan CCC — completed
| Component | Bed / bath | Built-up | Units | Price on the permit | Complete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pangsapuri Servis 54 storeys Siap Dengan CCC | 1, 2, 3, 12 / 1, 2, 3, 4 | 0 – 57 m² | 568 | RM1,042,360.00 – RM15,852,000.00 | 100.00% |
| Pangsapuri Servis 54 storeys Siap Dengan CCC | 1, 2, 3, 11 / 1, 2, 3 | 0 – 56 m² | 581 | RM1,022,000.00 – RM15,497,000.00 | 100.00% |
| Pangsapuri Servis 47 storeys Siap Dengan CCC | 3, 4 / 3, 4 | 0 – 214 m² | 165 | RM3,759,060.00 – RM23,760,000.00 | 100.00% |
Swipe the table sideways for the rest of the columns.
This is the document the developer had to file, and the housing department had to approve, before it was allowed to advertise at all — served from the ministry’s own host. It normally carries the location plan, the developer licence and building-plan approval references, the expected completion date, the encumbrance position, and the unit count and price floor and ceiling for each type. The brochure a salesperson hands you can be reissued. This one cannot.
Read from teduh.kpkt.gov.my on 2026-10-23, project code 19224-1. Re-read weekly.
30216-1 · PAVILION DAMANSARA HEIGHTS PHASE 2
Overall status: Lancar — on schedule
| Component | Bed / bath | Built-up | Units | Price on the permit | Complete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pangsapuri Servis 45 storeys Lancar | 5, 6 / 5, 6 | — | 154 | RM5,429,000.00 – RM19,812,000.00 | 56.36% |
Swipe the table sideways for the rest of the columns.
This is the document the developer had to file, and the housing department had to approve, before it was allowed to advertise at all — served from the ministry’s own host. It normally carries the location plan, the developer licence and building-plan approval references, the expected completion date, the encumbrance position, and the unit count and price floor and ceiling for each type. The brochure a salesperson hands you can be reissued. This one cannot.
Read from teduh.kpkt.gov.my on 2026-10-23, project code 30216-1. Re-read weekly.
30216-2 · PAVILION DAMANSARA HEIGHTS PHASE 2
Overall status: Lancar — on schedule
| Component | Bed / bath | Built-up | Units | Price on the permit | Complete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pangsapuri Servis 46 storeys Lancar | 1, 2, 3 / 1, 2, 3 | — | 490 | RM754,000.00 – RM4,666,000.00 | 60.08% |
Swipe the table sideways for the rest of the columns.
This is the document the developer had to file, and the housing department had to approve, before it was allowed to advertise at all — served from the ministry’s own host. It normally carries the location plan, the developer licence and building-plan approval references, the expected completion date, the encumbrance position, and the unit count and price floor and ceiling for each type. The brochure a salesperson hands you can be reissued. This one cannot.
Read from teduh.kpkt.gov.my on 2026-10-23, project code 30216-2. Re-read weekly.
What to do with the number. Read it against the delivery date in your own agreement, not against what a salesperson says. A project with a year left on its statutory clock and a third of the building up is telling you something the brochure will not.
How does that compare? Every development on this site, grouped by register status — cancelled, abandoned and behind schedule first.
No floor plan is reproduced on this page — but the drawings are findable
A floor plan is the developer’s copyright. This site does not mirror one and let you assume it is official. What it can do is send you to the drawing itself.
The advertisement the developer filed and the housing department approved normally carries the location plan and the unit count and price for each type. A salesperson’s brochure can be reissued. This one cannot.
The drawing that binds the developer is the one attached to your own sale and purchase agreement. Anything on any website is a reference copy — check the schedule to your contract before you sign.