Bangsar Hill Park @ Lorong Maarof

Why Bangsar Hill Park is worth a look — and the six things to get straight

This is Bangsar, on a hill, with a delivered first phase you can walk through and a second phase under a current permit. The documentation is unusually good. What needs care is not the quality of the project but the number of names attached to it.

Layouts, by phase

Verdura and Talisa publish different tables and their sizes genuinely differ — do not read one onto the other. Bathroom counts are not published by the developer for any layout in either phase, and one portal has relabelled the bedroom counts. The developer’s own labels are used here.

Talisa — Blocks B and C, completing January 2028

2 Bed 917 sq ft · 2+1 Bed 978 · 3 Bed 978–1,435 · 3+1 Bed 1,372–1,478

802 units8 units per floorCodes 2A, 2A1, 2B, 2B1, 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D

The developer’s own table for Blocks B and C. Type codes are taken from the developer’s own floor-plan asset names: 2A, 2A1, 2B, 2B1, 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D. Bathroom counts are not published for any of them. Note the overlap at 978 sq ft, where a 2+1 Bed and the bottom of the 3 Bed range share a built-up — so at that size the layout code matters more than the area does. Ask which stack and facing each code occupies, and get the bathroom count off the stamped plan.

Talisa II — the same scheme, with two extra codes and a smaller entry size

2 Bed · 2+1 · 3 Bed · 3+1 · overall range 803 – 1,478 sq ft

Same licence and APDL as TalisaEight codes: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2A1, 2B, 2B1, 3A, 3BPer-type sq ft not published as text

Statutorily this is Talisa — identical licence, permit, unit counts, price bands and completion date. Its marketing page adds the codes 1A and 1B and drops the entry built-up to 803 sq ft against Talisa’s 917. The eight codes match the published “8 units per floor”. Per-type square footages and bathroom counts exist only inside the plan images, not as text, so neither can be quoted here. It is reasonable to suppose 1A and 1B are the 803 sq ft end of the range — but that is an inference, not a published fact, so confirm it on the plan.

Verdura — Blocks D and E, complete

2 Bed 917 sq ft · 2+1 Bed 987 · 3 Bed 1,345 · 3+1 Bed 1,434–1,478

812 units8 units per floorBlock E codes 1A-E … 3B-E

The developer’s own table for Blocks D and E, and it is not the same as Talisa’s: the 2+1 is 987 sq ft here against 978 in Talisa, and the 3 Bed is a single 1,345 sq ft against Talisa’s 978–1,435 range. Block E codes are 1A-E, 1B-E, 2A-E, 2A1-E, 2B-E, 2B1-E, 3A-E and 3B-E. Bathroom counts are not published. A portal table appears to have copied Talisa’s sizes onto Verdura and also relabelled 978 sq ft as “3 bed 2 bath” and 1,372–1,478 as “4 bed 4 bath” by counting the utility room as a bedroom — use the developer’s labels, not the portal’s. Since this phase is built, you can view the actual unit.

All built-ups and bedroom labels are the developer’s own published figures from bangsarhillpark.com, taken separately from each phase’s page. Bathroom counts are not published by the developer for any layout in either phase. Type codes are read from the developer’s own floor-plan asset names. Per-layout car park allocation and the total bay count per phase are not published. No dimensioned floor plans are published as text. A separate residential component, “Residensi Maarof @ Bangsar Hill Park”, is the replacement-housing element of the urban renewal scheme and is not part of either phase above.

Bangsar Hill Park in pictures

All images are the developer’s own, published on bangsarhillpark.com and verified through the developer’s own media library. Every one of them has empty alt text on the developer’s site, so apart from the building elevations and the basketball court — which the developer’s file naming identifies — the captions above describe each image from the page section it appears in rather than from a developer caption. Renders are artist impressions and are not a representation of the finished building. Because Verdura is complete, ask for photographs of the built phase rather than relying on renders for it.

Location and connectivity — in stops, because nobody publishes kilometres

No source publishes a distance in kilometres to anything for this project, so this page gives none; every kilometre figure you may see elsewhere is an estimate. What the developer does publish is rail stop counts, which for a Bangsar address is arguably the more useful measure anyway.

Statutory particulars — both phases, separately

Both phases publish a full advertisement particulars block, which is better disclosure than most projects manage. They are reproduced separately below, because they are two different registered schemes with different licences, permits, unit counts, price bands and completion dates. Talisa’s permit is current; Verdura’s has expired because that phase has been delivered.

Talisa: building plan BP S1 OSC 2022 2431 (19) · type Condominium · leasehold 99 years expiring 13/10/2119 · encumbrance OCBC Bank Berhad (295400-W) · Blok B 410 units, Blok C 392 units · built-up 803 (min) to 1,478 (max) sq ft · expected completion January 2028 · statutory Unit Selling Price Block B RM934,000–RM1,806,000, Block C RM914,000–RM1,723,000.

Sources: the statutory advertisement particulars published by the developer on the Talisa and Verdura pages of bangsarhillpark.com, read on 30 September 2026. Neither block carries a storey count or a car park bay total.

Verdura, Blocks D and E — the completed phase, with an expired permit

Developer’s licence 7997/02-2026/0421(A), valid 13 February 2023 to 12 February 2026. APDL 7997-3/02-2025/0214(R)-(S), valid 13 February 2024 to 12 February 2025 — expired. Building plan BP S1 OSC 2019 0568. Approving authority Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur. Type Condominium. Leasehold 99 years expiring 13/10/2119. Encumbrance OCBC Bank Berhad. Blok D 406 units, Blok E 406 units, 812 in total. Expected completion March 2025. Statutory Unit Selling Price Block D RM835,000–RM1,472,000 and Block E RM928,000–RM1,599,000. The expiry is not a concern in itself: an APDL authorises the advertising and sale of units in an uncompleted scheme, and this phase was delivered — StarProperty reports completion in May 2025, EdgeProp reported Q2 2025 against a filed date of March 2025. But if you are buying remaining developer stock in Verdura rather than a resale unit, ask to see the current valid licence and APDL before paying anything.

Talisa II — the same registered scheme as Talisa

This deserves stating plainly because the separate marketing page invites the opposite conclusion. Talisa II’s statutory block is identical to Talisa’s: the same developer’s licence, the same APDL, the same Blocks B and C with 410 and 392 units, the same statutory price bands and the same January 2028 completion date. There is no separate licence and no separate APDL. It is a re-launch or continuing sales phase of the same two towers, not a third building. The substantive difference is in the marketing material: two extra layout codes, 1A and 1B, and a lower published entry built-up of 803 sq ft against Talisa’s 917.

The tenure, and one question worth asking

Both phases state leasehold, 99 years, expiring 13 October 2119 — about 93 years remaining as at 2026, which is long by Kuala Lumpur standards and should not constrain financing. Two things are not published and both are worth asking about: the lease commencement date, and whether the leasehold sits under a DBKL head lease. The second matters because this site was redeveloped under DBKL’s KL Urban Renewal Programme, and the structure of the underlying title affects future consents. Have your conveyancing lawyer confirm both against a land search. Whether titles issue as strata or individual is also not published.

The statutory price bands, and what they are not

Talisa: Block B RM934,000 to RM1,806,000, Block C RM914,000 to RM1,723,000. Verdura: Block D RM835,000 to RM1,472,000, Block E RM928,000 to RM1,599,000. These are statutory disclosures of the range within each block. They are not price lists, not quotations and not offers, and Verdura’s in particular describes the original scheme rather than what a completed unit transacts at today.

Unit totals — use 1,614, not 1,624

The two statutory blocks give 802 for Talisa and 812 for Verdura, totalling 1,614. The developer’s own About Us page says 1,624, which does not reconcile with its own filed particulars. This page uses 1,614. No whole-masterplan total can be stated, because Capella — announced as phase 3 for 2027 — has no published unit count, no licence and no particulars of any kind. Also note that Residensi Maarof @ Bangsar Hill Park is the replacement-housing component of the urban renewal scheme and is a separate matter from either phase here.

Not published, and therefore not on this page

The maintenance or service charge per square foot (one portal displays “RM 0”, which is an empty template field and is not a figure); the sinking fund; the car park allocation per layout and the total bays per phase; a confirmed vacant possession date for Talisa; Verdura’s certificate of completion and compliance or vacant possession notice date; the bathroom count for any layout; the total storeys from the developer; the lease commencement date; whether titles are strata or individual; whether the leasehold sits under a DBKL head lease; any Capella detail; and any distance in kilometres. This page also carries no discount, rebate, nett price, promotional package, incentive or commission figure, whether or not such things exist — those belong in a private conversation with a licensed agent, never on a public web page.

Bangsar Hill Park: the questions buyers actually ask

Other KL projects documented the same way

Published 30 September 2026 · Both phases’ statutory advertisement particulars read from the Talisa and Verdura pages of bangsarhillpark.com on 30 September 2026. Talisa’s APDL is current to 3 July 2027; Verdura’s expired on 12 February 2025 after that phase was delivered. Images are the developer’s own, verified through its media library; all have empty alt text on the source site, so most captions are inferred from page section rather than developer captions.