LUNAR Seputeh @ 9 Seputeh

Because Residensi Lunar is the registered scheme name on the KPKT filing, and LUNAR Seputeh is the marketing name. The registered name is what appears on your sale and purchase agreement, your loan documents and eventually your strata title.

Nothing has gone wrong if your paperwork says Residensi Lunar — but it is better to know that before you see it for the first time on a document you are being asked to sign.

It is the developer’s own lead feature and it is a real one. Most new high-rise stock on Old Klang Road is a serviced apartment on a commercial title; LUNAR is a condominium on a residential title.

In practice: residential water and electricity tariffs rather than commercial ones, and residential assessment rates. Over a twenty-year hold that is a meaningful running-cost difference, and it also widens your resale pool, since some buyers and some lenders treat commercial-title residential stock less favourably. The developer’s own wording is “For higher-valued homes and lower utility rates, supporting the way you live” — marketing phrasing, but the underlying point stands.

The KPKT filing says December 2030. The developer’s own microsite says January 2031. EdgeProp says Q4 2030 and PropertyGuru says 2031.

I lead with the filed date because that is the one lodged with the ministry, but honestly the one-month gap is the least of it — what matters is that this is a 2030 or 2031 completion, which is four to five years out. On that horizon, insist the date goes into your sale and purchase agreement, where statutory liquidated damages attach to it, and treat every published figure as indicative until then.

This is the one genuine contradiction in the paperwork and I would not want you to discover it at the solicitor’s office. The KPKT filing records the land encumbrance as “Tiada” — none. The developer’s current microsite records CIMB Bank Berhad.

The likely explanation is timing: the filing is older, the permit was issued 30 July 2026, and a development charge created in between would explain the difference. That is normal development financing and it is discharged on transfer of individual strata titles. But “likely” is not good enough on a title question, so ask for a current title search before you pay anything beyond a refundable booking. Your solicitor can do it quickly.

Nobody publishes this. Not the developer, not the filing, not the portals. The only parking figure anywhere in the project’s material is 12 EV charging bays on Level 1.

For a 483-unit tower with layouts running to 1,646 sq ft, that is a significant gap — a Type D buyer will reasonably expect two bays or more, and there is nothing in writing to confirm it. Make this your first question at the gallery, get the answer per layout and in writing, and ask whether additional bays can be purchased and at what price.

Partly — and unusually for this corridor, yes at the top of the range. Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur applies a RM1,000,000 minimum purchase price to non-citizens buying residential property. The filed statutory band here runs to RM1,615,800, so the threshold falls inside the range rather than above it.

Practically that points at Type D at 1,646 sq ft and possibly high-floor units in the 1,280 sq ft types. Three caveats: the test applies to the actual price on your sale and purchase agreement rather than a launch list; state consent to transfer to a non-citizen is a separate step; and this title additionally carries a Federal Territory Land Committee consent condition, which adds process to any future transfer. Malaysian PR does not help — land law treats a permanent resident as a foreign interest. Ask me to confirm the current threshold and exactly which units clear it before you commit.

Not published, and it is a fair question because the built-ups are identical — B1 and B1A are both 841 sq ft, C2 and C2A are both 1,280 sq ft. What differs is the unit count: 76 against 31, and 76 against 31.

An “A” suffix on an identical built-up almost always means position on the floor plate — a corner, a different aspect, or a mirrored plan — rather than size. Since the square footage is the same, position is the entire difference, so ask to see the plans and the stacking diagram side by side. The scarcer variant is not automatically the better one.

I will give you a view rather than a non-answer: Type B2 at 930 sq ft is the one I would look at hardest. It is the cheapest route to a third bedroom in the building, the next three-bedroom up is 1,280 sq ft, and there are only 31 of them.

The counter-argument is real too: the 1,280 sq ft band has 183 units across C1, C2 and C2A, which gives you far more choice of floor and orientation now — and when you eventually sell, 182 identically sized neighbours are your competition. Scarcity cuts both ways. Tell me your budget and how long you intend to hold and I will give you a straight recommendation rather than a menu.

Not published anywhere — not by the developer, the filing, the portals or the press. Maintenance charge and sinking fund are quoted per square foot of built-up area and they are the running cost that decides whether the purchase works over a long hold.

This building has over forty facilities across five levels, including an onsen bath, a sound studio, a gourmet kitchen on Level 45 and a 12-bay EV installation. That is a lot of plant to maintain across 483 units, and I would want the figure in writing before booking rather than after. Ask whether the car park is charged on top too.

No. There is no GreenRE and no Green Building Index rating published for LUNAR Seputeh or Residensi Lunar by the developer, and none in the public certification registry.

One thing to be careful of: the sibling phase Residensi Tria Seputeh, by the same developer in the same township, does hold a GBI certification — provisional, for a period that has since lapsed. That is a different building and it must not be read across to LUNAR. If an agent tells you LUNAR is green-certified, ask which registry entry they are looking at.

Not in the developer’s own words. EdgeProp builds its coverage around a Japanese “Tsuki” (moon) concept — tranquillity, balance, renewal — and that framing appears nowhere on the developer’s microsite.

What the developer actually uses is lunar naming: Moonlight Pavilion, Serenity Deck, Zen Courtyard, and an Onsen Bath on Level 12. So there are Japanese-inflected elements in the facilities, but the “Japanese-inspired development” framing is the publication’s, not the developer’s, and this page does not attribute it to MRCB.

Yes — in this same township. MRCB Seputeh Land Sdn Bhd is also the developer of Residensi Tria Seputeh within 9 Seputeh, and the wider group, Malaysian Resources Corporation Berhad, is the developer behind KL Sentral.

That makes this an easy piece of due diligence and the most valuable thing you can do before committing: go and look at Tria. Walk the lobby, look at the lifts and the common corridors, see how the landscaping has held up, and ask a resident what the management is like. On a purchase completing in 2030, a delivered building by the same entity a few hundred metres away tells you more than anything I can write. Ask me and I will arrange the visit.